Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.14400/JDC.2019.17.5.011

A study on the exploration of domestic cases about the life-cycle policy related to educational digital contents  

Cha, Hyunjin (School of General Education, Dankook University)
Publication Information
Journal of Digital Convergence / v.17, no.5, 2019 , pp. 11-21 More about this Journal
Abstract
In rapidly changing educational technology and trends, services providing educational digital contents have been focused on offering new contents customized on the state-of-the-art technology and trends, rather than re-evaluating or eliminating the contents on service based on the changed topics and video quality. This study explores domestic cases about educational digital contents in order to draw implications on proper life-cycle models and effective re-evaluation periods for the quality assurance of the contents. To achieve this objective, representative services in primary-secondary, higher, and lifelong education sectors were selected, and experts in the services were participated in focused group interview. Based on the interview results, the re-evaluation process and life-cycle issues in the management of contents were analyzed according to the educational levels and the implications on the life-cycle models were drawn. This study contributes to establishing a basis for the systematic life-cycle policy of the services in order to make more sustainable management of the digital contents.
Keywords
Educational Digital Contents; Life-cycle; Quality assurance; Focused Group Interview; Case study;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 3  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Gartner. (2018). 5 trends emerge in the Gartner Hype Cycle for Emerging Technologies. 2018. August 16, https://www.gartner.com/smarterwithgartner/5-trends-emerge-in-gartner-hype-cycle-for-emerging-technologies-2018/
2 M. M. Coulibaly. (1999). White paper: Cisco IOS Reference Guide. Cisco Systems, from https://nag.ru/goodies/docs/Cisco%20IOS%20Reference%20Guide.PDF
3 J. H. Lee, J. H. Kim, M. H. Cho & H. M. Jung (2014). Usage Trends of Products and Technology lifecycle. KISTI Technology Trends Analysis Paper from http://www.kosen21.org/info/gtbReport/gtbReportDetail.do?articleSeq=0000000760087
4 J. H. Kim, J. H. Lee, M. K. Lee, H. M. Jung, & W. K. Sung. (2012). Technology opportunity discovery model using typical features and decision trees. Journal of KIISE, 39(3), 215-224. UCI : G704-E00398.2012.39.3.008
5 H. W. Samuel & O. R. Zaïane. (2013). On Management of the Health Content Lifecycle. Journal of Public Health Frontier, 2(2), 83-96. DOI : 10.5963/phf0202005   DOI
6 S. T. Kim & W. G. Lee. (2016). Knowledge Map Service based on Ontology of nation R&D information. Journal of Digital Convergence, 14(3), 251-260. DOI : 10.14400/jdc.2016.14.3.251   DOI
7 G. McGovern & R. Norton. (2001). Content Critical. FT Press.
8 A. Rockley. (2002). Managing Enterprise Content: A Unified Content Strategy. New Riders Press.
9 The State government of Victoria in Australia. (2005). University of South Astralia, WHS Procedure: Document Control & Record Management. from http://w3.unisa.edu.au/safetyandwellbeing/SMS/procedures/document_control_and_record_management.pdf
10 J. Preece, Y. Rogers & H. Sharp. (2015). Interaction Design: beyond human-computer interaction. 4th ed. John Wiley & Sons Ltd. West Sussex:UK.
11 A. Freeman, S. Adams Becker, M. Cummins, A. Davis & C. Hall Giesinger. (2017). NMC/CoSN Horizon Report: 2017 K-12 Edition. Austin, Texas: The New Media Consortium.
12 S. Adams Becker, M. Brown, E. Dahlstrom, A. Davis, K. DePaul, V. Diaz & J. Pomerantz. (2018). NMC Horizon Report: 2018 Higher Education Edition. Louisville, CO: EDUCAUSE
13 KERIS. (2017). 2017 White paper on ICT in education. Korea, KERIS
14 H. J. Cha. (2018). A development study of checklists for quality assurance of K-MOOC. Journal of Lifelong Learning Society. 14(4), 137-166. DOI : 10.26857/JLLS.2018.11.14.4.137   DOI
15 H. Shenton. (2003). Life Cycle Collection Management. LIBER Quarterly: the Journal of European Research 13(3), 254-272. DOI : 10.18352/lq.7739
16 S. J. Kwak, W. K. Sung & K. J. Bae. (2011). A study on the analysis and evaluation for the life-cycle model of digital content. Journal of Information Management, 42(1), 25-46. DOI : 10.1633/jim.2011.42.1.025   DOI
17 C. I. Lim, Y. H. Cho & S. Y. Kim. (2014). A study on the practical solutions of promoting the use of e-learning in higher education. KERIS Research report RR 2014-5.
18 K. A. Son, M. L. Ahn, T. I. Han, B. S. Ko & Y. Kim. (2005). Analysis of foreign e-learning quality assurance guidelines. KERIS research paper, RM 2005-29.
19 J. H. Lim & C. S. Kim. (2007). Quality control of the educational contents based on life cycle. Journal of Korean Information Education, 11(4), 483-495. UCI : G704-000854.2007.11.4.002
20 Y. W. Lim, J. S. Park, M. S. Kang & Y. T. Lee. (2012). A study on the guideline development of operation and management of educational contents in cyber universities. KERIS research paper CRC 2012-4.
21 S. J. Kwak, J. M. Kim, Y. M. Jung, J. T. Kim & K. J. Bae. (2010). Best practices for archiving digital content by life cycle. KISTI research paper K-10-IR-12-01P-10.
22 S. John. (2015). Product Life-cycle Management (Volume 1): 21st Century Paradigm for Product Realisation. Switzerland: Springer International Publishing, DOI : 10.1007/978-3-319-17440-
23 S. John. (2018). Product Lifecycle Management (Volume 3): The Executive Summary, Springer International Publishing. Springer International Publishing AG. DOI : 10.1007/978-3-319-72236-8.
24 S. M. Keever. (1970). Understanding Web Content Management Systems: Evolution, Lifecycle and Market. Industrial Management and Data Systems, 103(9), 686-692. DOI : 10.1108/02635570310506106   DOI
25 A. Stephens. (1988). The application of life cycle costing in libraries. British Journal of Academic Librarianship, 3, 82-88. DOI : 10.1177/034003529402000208
26 G. Hodge. (2004). Digital preservation and permanent access to scientific information: the state of the practice. The International Council for Scientific and Technical Information (ICSTI) and CENDI. from http://www.icsti.org/IMG/pdf/preservationrpt-3.pdf
27 Y. S. Kwak. (2009). Qualitative analysis: Philosophy, Art and Education. Seoul: Education Science Publication
28 K. S. Kim, K. S. Han & H. W. Huh. (2012). A study on the benefits of PLM system based on data integration and process management. Journal of Digital Convergence, 10(6), 133-140. UCI : G704-002010.2012.10.6.023   DOI
29 H. Y. Kim & C. K. Youn. (2012). A case study for the application of storage tiering based on ILM through data value analysis. Journal of Digital Convergence, 10(8), 159-172. DOI : 10.1007/978-94-007-5860-5_126   DOI
30 T. J. Park, H. J. Cha & G. Y. Lee. (2016). A study on design guidelines of learning analytics to facilitate self-regulated learning in MOOCs. Educational Technology International, 17(1), 117-150. ECN : I410-ECN-0102-2017-370-000454220
31 M. L. Ahn, Y. Y. Choi, Y. M. Ko & Y. H. Bae. (2015). An international literature review on learning analytics: focused on empirical studies. Journal of Educational Information and Media, 21(4), 601-643. DOI : 10.15833/KAFEIAM.21.4.601