Journal of the Korean Institute of Landscape Architecture (한국조경학회지)

The Korean Institute of Landscape Architecture (한국조경학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Institutional Changes and Path Dependence to Private Parks - Focused on the Urban Park-Related Laws from 1967~2005 -

민간공원 관련 제도의 변천과 경로의존성 - 1967년부터 2005년까지 도시공원 법령을 중심으로 -

  • Oh, Chang-Song (Dept. of Forest Resources and Landscape Architecture, Yeungnam University)
  • 오창송 (영남대학교 산림자원 및 조경학과)
  • Received : 2019.01.23
  • Accepted : 2019.04.09
  • Published : 2019.04.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

This study was raised by the need to explain why the problems related to private parks have been sustained. In order to identify the fundamental cause, it is necessary to analyze the historical and institutional context of private parks. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to identify the direction of change in the private park system and to derive the characteristics of the system as it currently appears. The framework based on the historical institutionalism was divided into the Park Act (1967-1980), the former of Urban Park Act (1980-1993) and the late of Urban Park Act (1993-2005), and each was assessed using the analysis elements of the institutional environment and the outcomes of implementation. The analysis elements interpreted the path dependency, in which the inertia toward the choice of institution is maintained, despite the change in the environment. The institution took a special form of 'negative systeme' and secured profitability by expanding the types of park facilities while mitigating the criteria. Additionally, the designation of private park promoters as a landowner acted as a means of compensating those with property rights to unexecuted urban parks. The expectation effectiveness on urban park creation was insufficient and the environmental regulatory functions were weakened. Thus, historically, the private park system in Korea has experienced an 'institutional decoupling' as the purpose of the system and the results of actual outcomes are not consistent.

본 연구는 우리나라 민간공원과 관련된 문제점이 지속할 수 있었던 이유를 밝히고자 하는 필요성에서 제기되었다. 그리고 근본적인 원인을 파악하기 위해서는 민간공원의 역사와 제도적 맥락을 분석하는 것이 요구된다. 따라서 본 연구의 목적은 민간공원 제도의 변천 방향을 파악하고, 그 규칙으로 나타나는 제도의 특성을 도출하는 것이다. 역사적 제도주의 분석에 기초한 본 연구의 틀은 공원법(1967~1980년), 전기 도시공원법(1980~1993년)과 후기 도시공원법(1993~2005년)으로 시대구분을 하였고, 제도 환경과 작동 결과를 분석 요소로 설정하였다. 분석 내용은 환경의 변화에도 불구하고, 제도선택에 대한 관성적 경향이 지속된다는 우리나라 민간공원 제도의 경로의존성을 해석하였다. 본 제도는 '예외규제방식'이라는 특별한 형태를 취하였고, 공원시설 종류의 확대와 기준을 완화하여 수익성을 확보하였다. 그리고 사업자를 토지소유자로 한정한 것은 민간공원을 미집행 도시공원에 대한 재산권 보상 수단으로 작용하였다. 그 결과 도시공원 조성에 미친 기대 효과는 미흡하였고, 도시공원의 환경적 규제 기능은 약화되었다. 역사적으로 우리나라의 민간공원 제도는 제도의 취지와 시행 결과가 일치하지 않은 '제도적 디커플링'이 지속되었다고 볼 수 있다.

Keywords

References

  1. Beland, D.(2007) Ideas and institutional change in social security: Conversion, layering, and policy drift. Social Science Quarterly 88(1): 20-38. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6237.2007.00444.x
  2. Campbell, J. L.(2004) Globalization and Institutional Change. New Jersey: Princepton University Press.
  3. Cha, I. S.(1968) Urban development and finance: The realities of the introduction of private capital to urban development. Urban Affair Monthly Magazine 3(5): 30-39.
  4. Cho, D. H.(2017) Analysis on the change process of financial system in real estate development from the perspective of historical institutionalism. Journal of the Korean Urban Management Association 30(1): 51-78. https://doi.org/10.36700/KRUMA.2017.03.30.1.51
  5. Choi, M. J. and K. H. Hang(2002) Effectiveness of the incentives for securing public open space in urban design. Journal of Korea Planning Association 37(3): 91-104.
  6. Choi, Y. K.(1992) Urban parks management status and problems. Journal of the Korean Institute of Landscape Architecture 20(1): 115-118.
  7. Constitutional Court(1991) 1991. 11. 15. 90헌마23.
  8. Gwangju Metropolitan City(1995) 2011 Gwangju Master Plan.
  9. Hall, P. A. and R. C. R. Taylor(1996) Political science and the three new institutionalism. Political Studies 44(5): 936-957. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9248.1996.tb00343.x
  10. Heo, K. M,(2015) Legal issues of private development in urban development projects. Korean Public Land Law Association Conference 98: 1-20.
  11. Hong, S. K.(1994) Future direction of urban park and greenbelt policy for Seoul: The direction of the urban park and greenbelt policy in Seoul and the role of public and private sectors. Journal of the Korean Institute of Landscape Architecture 22(3): 175-204.
  12. Howlett, M. and J. Rayner(2006) Understanding the historical turn in the policy science: A critique of stochastic, narrative, path dependency and process-sequencing model of policy making over time, Policy Sciences 39: 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11077-005-9004-1
  13. Ikenberry, G. J.(1988) Conclusion: An institutional approach to American foreign economic policy. International Organization 42(1): 219-243. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818300007189
  14. Kang, S. Y. and Y. H. Jang(2004) History of Modern Parks in Korea, Seoul: Daewangsa.
  15. Kim, B. K.(2012a) Theory and practice on the activation of urban development by private sector-including the development of a raw land. Public Land Law Review 58: 69-104.
  16. Kim, E. M.(2012b) Analysis of Korean Housing Policy Changes-Analysis of Historical Institutionalism. Ph.D. Dissertation, Graduate School, Korea University. Kroea.
  17. Kim, H. B. and W. H. Jang(2017) The institutional understanding of the formalism of cultural policy-by the case study about the legislation process of the ‘law for promotion of regional culture. The Journal of Cultural Policy 31(2): 5-29.
  18. Kim, H.(2016) Characteristics and policy implications of private development parks in Japan. Journal of the Korean Institute of Landscape Architecture 44(1): 119-128. https://doi.org/10.9715/KILA.2016.44.1.119
  19. Kim, S. Y. and C. S. Lee(2010) A feasibility study on acquisition system of the urban parks under the special use permit. Journal of the Korean Institute of Landscape Architecture 38(4): 54-63.
  20. Kim, Y. G., S. Y. Han and K. J. Zoh(2011) A study of urban park development and management through public-private partnership. Journal of the Korean Institute of Landscape Architecture 39(3): 83-97. https://doi.org/10.9715/KILA.2011.39.3.083
  21. Kim, Y. K.(2015) The policy of park asset transfers in England: A move toward community ownership and park management. Journal of the Korean Institute of Landscape Architecture 43(1): 108-119. https://doi.org/10.9715/KILA.2015.43.1.108
  22. Korea Research Institute of Human Settlement(1995) A Study on the Improvement of the Installation and Management of Urban Parks.
  23. Korea Research Institution for Local Administration(1992) A Study on the Development and Financing of Urban Parks.
  24. Krasner, S. D.(1984) Approaches to the state alternative conception and historical dynamics. Comparative Politics 16(2): 223-246. https://doi.org/10.2307/421608
  25. Lee, J. H.(2018) The Private-Initiated Park Development Project Implementation Strategies through Conflict Cause Analysis. Master's Thesis, Graduate School of Kwangwoon University. Korea.
  26. Lee, J. J., S. C. Park and H. Kim(2009) A study on the effective plans to increase urban parks through activating private participation: Focusing on the plans to improve park facilities at the balance point of public and private interest. Journal of the Korean Association of Professional Geographers 43(4): 675-684.
  27. Lim, Y. L. and G. Y. Kim(2007) The study on a solution to urban planning facilities unexecuted in long-term by utilizing private capital: Focusing on cases. Journal of the Korean Regional Development Association 19(1): 123-141.
  28. Mahoney, J.(2000) Path dependence in historical sociology. Theory and Society 29(4): 507-548. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007113830879
  29. Ministry of Construction(1962) Request the Park Bill Cooperation.
  30. Ministry of Construction(1963a) Withdrawal of the Park Act.
  31. Ministry of Construction(1963b) Withdrawal of the Park Act.
  32. Ministry of Construction(1979) Request of opinions according to the enactment of the Urban Park Act.
  33. Ministry of Government Administration(1959) The Park Bill.
  34. Mun, S. D.(2014) Research on the legal system of urban park. Korean Local Government Law Association 14(4): 159-186. https://doi.org/10.21333/lglj.2014.14.4.006
  35. Noh, T. W., M. H. Park, M. K. Byeon, H. C. Seong, I. S. Shin, S. W. Ahn, M. W. Lee, W. S. Lee and B. K. Jang(2001) Current status and tasks of urban parks and greenbelt. Urban Information 227: 4-18.
  36. North, D. C.(1990) Institutions, Institutional Changes and Economic Performances. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  37. North, D. C.(2005) Understanding the Process of Economic Change. New Jersey: Princepton University Press.
  38. Pae, S. H.(1970) Urban Development and the Introduction of Private Capital: The Method and Limitation of Urban Development and the Introduction of Private Capital.
  39. Park, I, J.(2002) A Study of the History of Parks Systeme Transformation of Seoul, Korea. Ph.D. Dissertation, Graduate School of Sangmyung University. Korea.
  40. Peters, B. G.(2000) Institutional Theory in Political Science: The New Institutionalism. New York: Continuum.
  41. Pierson, P.(2000) Increasing retuens, path dependency, and the study of politics. The American Political Science Review 94(2): 251-267. https://doi.org/10.2307/2586011
  42. Regulatory Reform Committee(1998) Regulatory Reform Plan of the Ministry of Construction and Transportation.
  43. Ryu, H. W.(2000) A study on the changes of housing site development system and the influence of urban development system. Study on land of Korea Land Corporation 11(2): 47-60.
  44. Seoul District Court(1994). 1994. 5. 7.
  45. Seoul Metropolitan City(1995) A Study on the Policy Direction of Parks and Greenbelts in Seoul.
  46. Seoul National University Graduate School of Environmental Studies (1994) Environmental Impact Survey of the Construction of the Cheongdam Park Golf Training Center.
  47. Shin, I. S.(1996) A study on improvement of legal systemfor promoting development of long-term unexecuted urban parks. Journal of Green Industrial Research, Honam Univ. 3: 203-218.
  48. Son, J .M.(1986) The footprint of urban planning in Korea: Focusing on the legislation process. Research for Local Administration 1(2): 3-12.
  49. Streeck, W. and K. Thelen, eds.(2005) Beyond Continuity: Institutional Change in Advanced Political Economies. New York: Oxford University Press.
  50. Supreme Court(1995a). 1995. 7. 14. 선고94누5137.
  51. Supreme Court(1995b). 1995. 5. 23. 자 94마2218.
  52. Thelen, K.(2004) How Institutions Evolve: The Political Economy of Skills in Germany, Britain, the United State, and Japan. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  53. Thelen, K., S. Steinmo and F. Longstreth eds.(1992) Structuring Politics: Historical Institutionalism in Comparative Analysis. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  54. Uhm, K.B.(2005) How was Seoul planned, Paju:Sallim.
  55. Won, J. S., J. H. Choi and K. H. Kim(2007) A study on improved incentive system for expanding public facilities for neighborhoods in the district unit plans. Journal of Korea Planning Association 42(3):151-161.
  56. Yang, S. U.(2007) Construction of golf driving range facilities and local resident's environmental right. Kangwon Law Review 25: 51-94. https://doi.org/10.18215/kwlr.2007.25..51
  57. Yoon, E. J.(2016) Consideration of issues about public and private interests of park create through private participation. Korean Association for Policy Studies Spring Conference:1-16.
  58. Dong-A Il Bo. 1964. 11. 18., 1967. 8. 17., 1967. 9. 12., 1967. 9. 14., 1968. 3. 20., 1968. 11. 9., 1970. 6. 19., 1982. 3. 8., 1983. 3. 11., 1984. 9. 18. (동아일보. newslibrary.naver.com)
  59. Kyunghyang. 1968. 2. 22., 1968. 5. 22., 1968. 6. 13., 1968. 10. 1., 1968. 11. 11., 1981. 11. 12. (경향신문. newslibrary.naver.com)
  60. Maeil Business. 1969. 12. 11., 1979. 9. 22. (매일경제. newslibrary.naver.com)
  61. Hangyerore. 1991. 2. 5. (한겨레. newslibrary.naver.com)