Journal of the Korea Society of Computer and Information (한국컴퓨터정보학회논문지)

Korean Society of Computer Information (한국컴퓨터정보학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Comparative Analysis on Software Education Unit in Practical Arts Textbooks based on 2015 Revised National Curriculum

  • Kim, Ji-Yun (Dept. of Computer Education, Korea National University of Education) ;
  • Lee, Tae-Wuk (Dept. of Computer Education, Korea National University of Education)
  • Received : 2019.01.15
  • Accepted : 2019.02.22
  • Published : 2019.02.28
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

In this paper, we proposed comparison of software education units according to 2015 Revised National Curriculum. Comparative analysis of 6 Practical Arts textbooks was conducted especially on the software education units. The analysis criteria were decided to be unit system, unit structure, learning objectives, the way of placing contents, activities, supporting materials, providing resources, and evaluation. As a result, the software education units have secured a lot of quantity compared to the total number of units. And the affective domain of the learning objectives is shown to be lacking. All the textbooks were uniformly arranged the component of contents described in 2015 revised national curriculum. Cooperative activities are strengthened compared to the previouse curriculum. On the other hand, evaluations have a large variation among textbooks and some have fewer types.

Keywords

CPTSCQ_2019_v24n2_217_f0001.png 이미지

Fig. 1. Frequency of the Objectives by Domain

CPTSCQ_2019_v24n2_217_f0002.png 이미지

Fig. 2. Quantity of Supporting Materials by the Types

CPTSCQ_2019_v24n2_217_f0003.png 이미지

Fig. 3. Quantity of Providing Resources by purpose

CPTSCQ_2019_v24n2_217_f0004.png 이미지

Fig. 4. Quantity of Evaluation by purpose

Table 1. Content Structure related to Informatics[5]

CPTSCQ_2019_v24n2_217_t0001.png 이미지

Table 2. Comparison of Curriculum[5][6]

CPTSCQ_2019_v24n2_217_t0002.png 이미지

Table 3. Analysis Criteria of Each Study[11-14]

CPTSCQ_2019_v24n2_217_t0003.png 이미지

Table 4. List of Authorized Practical Art Textbooks

CPTSCQ_2019_v24n2_217_t0004.png 이미지

Table 5. Analysis Criteria[14]

CPTSCQ_2019_v24n2_217_t0005.png 이미지

Table 6. Unit Structure and Ratio

CPTSCQ_2019_v24n2_217_t0006.png 이미지

Table 7. Unit System of Software Education Unit

CPTSCQ_2019_v24n2_217_t0007.png 이미지

Table 8. Frequency of the Objectives by Domain

CPTSCQ_2019_v24n2_217_t0008.png 이미지

Table 9. The Way of Placing and Quantity of Content Elements

CPTSCQ_2019_v24n2_217_t0009.png 이미지

Table 10. Quantity and Ratio of Supporting Materials by the Types

CPTSCQ_2019_v24n2_217_t0010.png 이미지

Table 11. Frequency and Ratio of Activities by Types

CPTSCQ_2019_v24n2_217_t0011.png 이미지

Table 12. Frequency of Providing Resources by purpose

CPTSCQ_2019_v24n2_217_t0012.png 이미지

Table 13. Frequency of Evaluation by Type

CPTSCQ_2019_v24n2_217_t0013.png 이미지

References

  1. MOE, "Related Press 'Elementary School Textbook, Transition from National to Authorized in 2022," Explanation of MOE, Jan. 2019.
  2. Duty Director of National Curriculum Policy, "Plan for diversification and free publication of textbooks," Dec. 2018.
  3. Wikipedia, "Korean History Textbook Nationalizing Controversy," https://ko.wikipedia.org/wiki/%ED%95%9C%EA%B5%AD%EC%82%AC_%EA%B5%90%EA%B3%BC%EC%84%9C_%EA%B5%AD%EC%A0%95%ED%99%94_%EB%85%BC%EB%9E%80, Jan. 2019.
  4. MOE, "Guideline for Software Education," Feb. 2015a.
  5. MEST, "The Practical Arts (Technology/Home Economics) and Informatics Curriculum," pp. 3-28, Sep, 2015b.
  6. MOE, Science and Technology, "The Practical Course(Technology.Home Economics) Curriculum," Aug. 2011.
  7. Shkim, “Analysis of Abstraction Contents in Informatics Textbooks of Middle School According to 2015 Revised Curriculum,” The Journal of Korean Association of Computer Education, Vol. 21, No. 5, pp. 1-10, Sep. 2018. https://doi.org/10.32431/kace.2018.21.5.001
  8. Ohkang and Jichoi, "Analysis of Inquisitive Tendency in the 2015 Revised Middle School Informatics Textbooks," Proceedings of The Korean Association of Computer Education Conference, Vol. 22, No. 1, Jan. 2018.
  9. Ohkang, "Analysis of Inquisitive Tendency in High School Informatics Textbooks," Proceedings of The Korean Association of Computer Education Conference, Vol. 23, No. 1, Dec. 2018.
  10. Ohkang, "Analysis of Learning Objectives in Middle School Informatics Textbooks," Proceedings of The Korean Association of Computer Education Conference, Vol. 23, No. 1, Dec. 2018.
  11. Chlee, “A Comparative Analysis of Information Unit Contents in 2007 Revised Practical Arts Textbooks,” Journal of Korean Practical Arts Education, Vol. 17, No. 2, pp. 99-124, June 2011. https://doi.org/10.17055/JPAER.2011.17.2.99
  12. Sjpark, Yhchoi, Yjwang, and Sykim, "Comparative Analysis on Contents of Information Media and Cyber Space in the Practical Arts Textbooks of the Revised Curriculum 2007," Journal of Korean Practical Arts Education, Vol. 25, No. 1, pp. 21-44, March 2012.
  13. Hgkim, "Analysis of Inquisitive Tendency of the Units on 'Life & Information' in Practical Arts Textbook According to 2011 Revised National Curriculum," Education Review, Vol. 53, No. 1, pp. 1-18. March. 2016a.
  14. Hgkim, "Comparative Analysis of the Units on 'Life & Information' in Practical Arts Textbook According to 2011 Revised National Curriculum," Journal of Practical Arts Education Research, Vol. 22, No. 1, pp. 117-133, Feb. 2016b.
  15. Sbjeong et al, "Practical Arts(for 5-6 Grades) 6," Kyohak Publishing, pp. 54-77. March 2019.
  16. Csryu et al, "Practical Arts(for 5-6 Grades) 6," Kumsung Publishing, pp. 32-59. March 2019.
  17. Wsseo et al, "Practical Arts(for 5-6 Grades) 6," Donga Publishing, pp. 66-95. March 2019.
  18. Chlee et al, "Practical Arts(for 5-6 Grades) 6," Mirae N, pp. 36-59. March 2019.
  19. Hssong et al, "Practical Arts(for 5-6 Grades) 6," Visang Education, pp. 56-83. March 2019.
  20. Cslee et al, "Practical Arts(for 5-6 Grades) 6," Chunjae Textbook, pp. 72-97. March 2019.
  21. Twlee and Hjchoi, "Informatics Education," Hanbit Academy, pp.149-161. March 2016.