벤처창업연구 (Asia-Pacific Journal of Business Venturing and Entrepreneurship)

  • 제13권5호
  • /
  • Pages.55-61
  • /
  • 2018
  • /
  • 1975-7557(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2671-9509(eISSN)
한국벤처창업학회 (The Korean Society of Business Venturing)
권호 표지

교육훈련이 기업성과에 미치는 영향 분석: 조직성과와 재무성과의 차이분석을 중심으로

The Study of Firm Performance for Education and Training: The Difference of Organization and Finance Performance

  • 투고 : 2018.07.11
  • 심사 : 2018.10.31
  • 발행 : 2018.10.31
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

본 논문은 기업의 교육훈련에 대한 투자가 기업의 성과에 영향을 미치는 변수별 효과를 살펴봄으로써 기업의 교육훈련에 대한 관심과 투자를 촉진하고, 이를 지원하기 위한 정책적 함의를 도출하는데 목적이 있다. 분석자료는 HCCP를 사용하였으며, 분석방법은 동태패널 모형과 변수의 내생성 문제해결을 위한 방법을 적용하였다. 분석 결과, 기업의 교육훈련이 1인당 매출액에는 양(+)의 영향을 미치나 재무성과인 1인당 순이익에 미치는 영향은 일부 모형에서만 양(+)의 효과로 나타났다. 그러나 내생성을 고려한 모형에서는 1인당 순이익이 유의한 양(+)의 효과로 나타나 변수의 내생성도 중요한 고려요인임을 확인하였다. 이를 통해 기업에서는 단기적인 성과보다는 중장기적인 관점에서 교육훈련에 대한 관심과 투자를 확대해 나간다면 기업의 조직성과 및 재무성과에 크게 기여할 것이다.

The main purpose of this study is to test the effects of education and training invest of firm performance and to find the strategy of human resources development to industry include company and government, each stakeholder etc. For this purpose, this study empirical tested the causality, effects between education and training and firm performance. Using the HCCP panel data set, panel analysis model is performed with the dependent variables. The results of the study are summarized as follows. First, education and training has a significant impact on the firm sales per employee head. But there is no evidence for the effect of education and training on the net profit per employee head. These study results indicate that firms have to increase the concern and invest for education and training.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Arellano, M., & Bond, S.(1991). Some Tests of Specification for Panel Data: Monte Carlo Evidence and an Application to Employment Equations, Review of Economic Studies, 58, 277-297. https://doi.org/10.2307/2297968
  2. Blundell, R., & Bond.(1998). Initial Conditions and Moment Restrictions in dynamic Panel Data Models, Journal of Econometrics, 87, 115-143. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-4076(98)00009-8
  3. Barrett, A., & O'Connell, P.(2001). Does Training Generally Work? The Returns to In-Company Training, Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 54, 647-662 https://doi.org/10.1177/001979390105400307
  4. Bishop, J. H.(1996). What We Know About Employer-Provided Training: A Review of Literature, CAHRS, Working Paper, 96-09
  5. Black, S., & Lynch, L.(1995). How to Complete; The Impact of Workplace Practices and Information Technology on Productivity, The Review of Economics and Statistics, 83, 434-445
  6. Bublitz, B., & Ettredge, M.(1989). The Information in Discretionary Outlays; Advertising, Research and Development, The Accounting Review, 108-124
  7. Chauvin, K., & Hirschey, M.(1993). Advertising, R&D Expenditures and the Market Value of the Firm, Financial Management, 128-140
  8. Kang, S. H.(2010). The Effects of Corporate Career Development Program on the Productivity and Profit, The Korea Journal of Korea Labor Institute, 10(2), 35-65.
  9. Kim, M. R., Park, L. I., Seol, G. H., Nho, Y. J., & Lee, S. M.(2017). The Skills Development in Korean Firms: The Results from the Human Capital Corporate Panel(2007-2015), Sejong-si: Korea Research Institute for Vocational Education & Training.
  10. Kim, J. D.(2011). The Effects of Training & Development on Firm Performance, HRD Research, The Korea Journal of Human Resource Development, 13(1), 99-116. https://doi.org/10.18211/kjhrdq.2011.13.1.005
  11. Lee, N. L., & Jeong, H. Y.(2017). The Effects of Education and Training Investment on Business Performance, The Korea Journal of Human Resource Management, 24(2), 49-61.
  12. Na, I. K.(2016). The Analysis on the Causal Relationship between Investments on Training and Firm Performance, The Korea Journal of Human Resource Management, 23(1), 323-344.
  13. Tharenou, P., Saks, A., & Moore, C.(2007). A Review and Critique of Research on Training and Organizational-level Outcomes, Human Resource Management Review, 17, 251-273. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2007.07.004