창업기업 지원 정책 개선 방안 연구: ICT 창업기업을 중심으로

A Study on the Improvement the Start-up Support Policy: Focused on the ICT Start-up

  • Gil, Wungyu (Technology Commercialization Division, Electronics and Telecommunications Research Institute) ;
  • Bae, Hongbeom (Science and Technology Management Policy, University of Science and Technology) ;
  • Sim, Yongho (Technology Commercialization Division, Electronics and Telecommunications Research Institute) ;
  • Kim, Seokyun (Technology Commercialization Division, Electronics and Telecommunications Research Institute)
  • 투고 : 2018.07.13
  • 심사 : 2018.08.27
  • 발행 : 2018.08.31

초록

창업활성화와 중소기업의 안정적인 성장을 유도하기 위해 다양한 지원 정책이 추진되고 있다. 정부에서는 조세 금융의 직접적인 방법과 지원 사업을 통한 간접적인 방법으로 효과적인 지원을 위해 노력하고 있다. 그러나 정부의 창업정책에 대한 견해는 여전히 팽팽하다. 지원의 필요성에 대해서는 공감하고 있으나, 지원 방식과 지원사업의 실효성에 대해 논의가 이어지고 있다. 본 연구에서는 정부 창업지원 사업의 실효성을 확인하기 위해 창업지원 사업에 대한 중요도와 만족도를 평가하고자 한다. 이를 위해 정부창업지원 사업을 경험한 ICT 창업 기업을 대상으로 설문을 수행하였으며, 이 중 128개를 대상으로 GAP 분석 및 ISA 분석을 진행하였다. 정부 창업지원 사업에 대한 GAP 분석 결과, 중요도(5.221)에 비해 만족도(4.408)가 낮게 측정되었으며, 이를 통해 창업지원 사업에 대한 수혜자의 평가는 부정적임을 확인하였다. 중요도-만족도 분석 결과 유지 영역에는 'R&D', '사업화'가 위치하고 있으며, 집중 영역에는 '정책자금', '판로 마케팅 해외진출' 지원 사업이 포함되어 있다. 저순위 영역에는 '창업행사 네트워크' 항목이 포함되어 있으며, 마지막으로 과잉 영역에는 '시설 공간', '멘토링 컨설팅', '창업 교육'이 위치하고 있다. 각각의 창업지원 사업이 전반적인 중요도에 미치는 영향력을 분석하고자 다중회귀분석을 실시한 결과, 'R&D', '창업교육', '정책자금'의 순서대로 만족도에 영향을 미치는 것으로 나타났다. 본 연구 결과를 바탕으로 ICT창업기업에 대한 지원 정책 수립과 제도 개선을 통해 정부 창업지원사업의 질적 수준을 개선하는 데 기여할 수 있을 것으로 기대된다.

Various government support policies are being promoted in order to stimulate growth of SMEs. The government is striving to provide effective support through direct methods of tax, finance and indirect methods through support programs. However, the view on the government's startup policy is still tense. We are sympathetic with the need for support, but discussions continue to be made on the effectiveness of support projects and support projects. Therefore, this study evaluates the importance and satisfaction of the government start-up support project. For this purpose, we conducted questionnaires on ICT start-ups who have experienced government start-up support projects. Of these, 128 were analyzed for GAP analysis and ISA. As a result of the GAP analysis of the government start - up support project, the degree of satisfaction (4.408) was lower than the degree of importance (5.221), confirming that the beneficiary's evaluation on the start-up support project was negative. As a result of the importance-satisfaction analysis, 'R&D' and 'commercialization' are located in the maintenance area, and 'government funding', 'marketing, overseas advancement' projects are included in the concentrated area. In the low-ranking areas, there are 'entrepreneur events and networks' items. Finally, there are 'facilities and spaces', 'mentoring and consulting', and 'entrepreneurship education' in the surplus areas. As a result of multiple regression analysis, it was found that 'R&D', 'entrepreneurial education', and 'government funding' influenced satisfaction. Based on the results of this study, it is expected that it will contribute to improving the quality level of the government start-up support project by establishing the support policy for the ICT start-up enterprises and improving the system.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Ahn, S. G.(2017). A Study on the Factors Affecting the Performance of Technology-based Startups: Focusing on the Analysis of Policy Effectiveness. KISTEP
  2. An, S. B.(2017). The Current Status and Development Measures of Start-Up Support System of Korea, The Review of Business History, 82(2), 149-172.
  3. Bae, Z. T., & Cha, M. S.(2009). Expanding and Revitalizing Entrepreneurship in Korea, 중소기업연구, 31(1), 109-128.
  4. Blanchflower, D. G.(2004). Self-Employment: More May not be Better(No. w10286), National Bureau of Economic Research.
  5. Byun, C. G., & Ha, H. H.(2013). An Application of Dominance Analysis and Regression Analysis for Determining the Relative Importance of Critical Factors in Satisfaction of Start-up Support Service Program, Asia-Pacific Journal of Business Venturing and Entrepreneurship, 8(3), 67-76.
  6. Choi, S. K., Oh, C. H., Lee, J. H., Jang, H. J. & Shin, Y.(2015). A Study of Legitimacy for Supporting SMEs and Government Role for Policy. Seoul; KOSBI
  7. Duke, C. R., & Persia, M. A.(1996). Performance-Importance Analysis of Escorted Tour Evaluations, Journal of Travel & Tourism Marketing, 5(3), 207-223. https://doi.org/10.1300/J073v05n03_03
  8. Gartner, W. B., & Vesper, K. H.(1994). Experiments in Entrepreneurship Education: Sucess and Failures, Journal of Business Venturing, 9(3), 179-187. https://doi.org/10.1016/0883-9026(94)90028-0
  9. Global Entrepreneurship Monitor.(2017). Global Report 2016/17. London; Global Entrepreneurship Research Association
  10. Gil, W. G., Sim, Y. H., & Kim, S. K.(2016). Study of Startup Policy of Government Research Institute through Importance-Satisfaction Analysis of ETRI Pre-Startup Support Program, Asia-Pacific Journal of Business Venturing and Entrepreneurship, 11(5), 45-56. https://doi.org/10.16972/apjbve.11.5.201610.45
  11. Ha, K. S., Kim, D. H., Yoo, B. J., Jin, S. J., Park, B. J., Kang, J. H. & Kim, S. J.(2013). Changes in domestic business start-up policy and evaluation result report. Seoul; The Korean Society of Business Venturing
  12. Han, J. H.(2000). A Study on Activating Factors of Venture Entrepreneur in Korea, Doctoral Dissertation, Kyung-Hee University, Korea.
  13. Hong, K. P., Choi, J. I. & Jang, S. K.(2017). Characteristics and Performances of Public Science and Technology-based Startup Training Program, Korean Journal of Resources Development, 20(4), 271-292. https://doi.org/10.24991/KJHRD.2017.12.20.4.271
  14. Hudson, S., & Shephard, G. W. H.(1998). Measuring Service Quality at Tourist Destinations: An Application of Importance-Performance Analysis to an Alpine Ski Resort, Journal of Travel & Tourism Marketing, 7(3), 61-77. https://doi.org/10.1300/J073v07n03_04
  15. Jeon, C. S.(2011). An Empirical Study on the Firms 'Financial Performances: The Case of Coupon System, Master's Thesis, Paichai University, Korea.
  16. Jeon, I. O.(2012). Established business start-up support Impact on The youth of business performance, Journal of Digital Convergence, 10(11), 103-114. https://doi.org/10.14400/JDPM.2012.10.11.103
  17. Johnson, B. R.(1990). Toward a multidimensional model of entrepreneurship: The case of achievement motivation the entrepreneur, Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 16(1), 39-54.
  18. Kane, T.(2010). The Importance of Startups in Job Creation and Job Destruction, Kauffman Foundation Research Series: Firm Formation and Economic Growth.
  19. Kim, C. K., Lee, C. S. & Kim, J. S.(2014). Analysis of Factors Influencing the Early Performance of Technology-Based Start-ups. Korean Corporation Management Review, 57(-), 63-86.
  20. Kim, D. H.(2004). A Study on the Development of Business Incubator, Korean Journal of Business Administration, 44(-), 1151-1176.
  21. Kim, K. A.(2008). A Study on the Education on the Commencement of an Enterprise by women and Success Factors in Dining Business, Master's Thesis, Dong-Eui University, Korea.
  22. Kim, M. S., & Kim, G. S.(2002). The Relationships of Importance/Performance, Effectiveness and User's Satisfaction for Hotel Information System, Korean Journal of Tourism Research, 17(2), 199-214.
  23. Kim, Y. T.(2009). An Empirical Study of Effect and Improvement of Entrepreneurship Education, Master's Thesis, Chung-Ang University, Korea.
  24. Korea Institute of Startup & Entrepreneurship Development.(2014). Changes and Evaluation of Domestic Entrepreneurship Policy.
  25. Korea Institute of Startup & Entrepreneurship Development.(2017). Startup Statistics 2016. Daejeon; MSS.KISED.
  26. Korea Venture Business Association.(2016). 2016 Korea Institute of ICT startup & Entrepreneurship Development.
  27. Lee, H. J.(2007). An Empirical Study on the Performance of ITBI's Tenant, Doctoral Dissertation, Paichai University, Korea.
  28. Martilla, J., & James, J. C.(1977). Importance-performance analysis, Journal of Marketing, 41(1), 13-17. https://doi.org/10.2307/1250226
  29. Min, K. R.(2010). An Empirical Study on the Effect of Entrepreneurial Consulting for the Business Performance of Start-Up Company, Master's Thesis, Chung-Ang University, Korea.
  30. Ministry of SMEs and Startups.(2009). 2008 Small Business Consulting Industry White Paper. Daejeon; MSS.
  31. Oh, C. H., Park, J. Y., Shin, Y., Woo, Y. S., Lee, M. C., Jang, H. J., Yoo, J. M., Oh, S. H. & Ahn. E. S.(2012). The SME policy in 50 years and the Future of SME policy. Seoul; The Korean Association for Policy Studies
  32. Park, N. G., Kim, M. S.,& Ko, J. W.(2015). The Effect of the Government's Entrepreneurial Support Policy on Entrepreneurship and Entrepreneurial Intention, Asia-Pacific Journal of Business Venturing and Entrepreneurship, 10(6), 89-98. https://doi.org/10.16972/apjbve.10.6.201512.89
  33. Park, S. K., & Lee, H. B.(2015). The Effect of the Perceived Usefulness of Government SME R&D Support Policy on the Technology Innovation System : Focusing on the Moderating Role of Authentic Leadership, Journal of Industrial Economics and Business, 28(1), 501-527.
  34. Ryu, S. J., & Yang, H. S.(2016). The Influence of Senior Entrepreneurial Decision Making Types and Entrepreneurial Supporting Policy on Start-up Performance, Journal of Korea Academia-Industrial cooperation Society, 17(4), 106-121. https://doi.org/10.5762/KAIS.2016.17.4.106
  35. Song, C. S., Park, J. P.(2013). An Study on the Effectiveness of Venture Firm Supporting Policies in Korea. Korean Corporation Management Review, 51(-), 215-240.
  36. Suh, C. S.(2002). A Study on Dynamic Management-Patterns of Korean Ventures, Doctoral Dissertation, Hoseo University, Korea.
  37. Tonge, J., & Moore, S. A.(2006). Importance-satisfaction analysis for marine-park hinterlands: A Western Australian case study, Tourism Management, 28(3), 768-776. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2006.05.007
  38. Yoon. B. S.(2004). Individual Characteristics and Environmental Factors=Determinants of Entrepreneurial Intentions, Korean Business Review, 17(2), 89-110.
  39. Yoon, S. H.(2017, September 26). Korea creates the Innovation Venture Group, Inews24, http://news.inews24.com/php/news_view.php?g_serial=1050790&g_menu=022100&rrf=nv