DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Performance Evaluation of Stealth Chamber as a Novel Reference Chamber for Measuring Percentage Depth Dose and Profile of VitalBeam Linear Accelerator

VitalBeam 선형가속기의 심부선량백분율과 측방선량분포 측정을 위한 새로운 기준 전리함으로서 스텔스 전리함의 성능 평가

  • Kim, Yon-Lae (Department of Radiologic Technology, Choonhae College of Health Science) ;
  • Chung, Jin-Beom (Department of Radiation Oncology, Seoul National Univ. Bundang Hospital) ;
  • Kang, Seong-Hee (Department of Radiation Oncology, Seoul National Univ. Bundang Hospital) ;
  • Kang, Sang-Won (Department of Biomedical Engineering, The Catholic University) ;
  • Kim, Kyeong-Hyeon (Department of Biomedical Engineering, The Catholic University) ;
  • Jung, Jae-Yong (Department of Radiation Oncology, Sanggye Paik Hospital) ;
  • Shin, Young-Joo (Department of Radiation Oncology, Sanggye Paik Hospital) ;
  • Suh, Tae-Suk (Department of Biomedical Engineering, The Catholic University) ;
  • Lee, Jeong-Woo (Department of Radiation Oncology, Konkuk University Hospital)
  • 김연래 (춘해보건대학교 방사선과) ;
  • 정진범 (분당서울대학교 방사선종양학과) ;
  • 강성희 (분당서울대학교 방사선종양학과) ;
  • 강상원 (가톨릭대학교 의공학교실) ;
  • 김경현 (가톨릭대학교 의공학교실) ;
  • 정재용 (상계백병원 방사선종양학과) ;
  • 신영주 (상계백병원 방사선종양학과) ;
  • 서태석 (가톨릭대학교 의공학교실) ;
  • 이정우 (건국대학교병원 방사선종양학과)
  • Received : 2018.06.04
  • Accepted : 2018.06.25
  • Published : 2018.06.30

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the performance of a "stealth chamber" as a novel reference chamber for measuring percentage depth dose (PDD) and profile of 6, 8 and 10 MV photon energies. The PDD curves and dose profiles with fields ranging from $3{\times}3$ to $25{\times}25cm^2$ were acquired from measurements by using the stealth chamber and CC 13 chamber as reference chamber. All measurements were performed with Varian VitalBeam linear accelerator. In order to assess the performance of stealth chamber, PDD curves and profiles measured with stealth chamber were compared with measurement data using CC13 chamber. For PPDs measured with both chambers, the dosimetric parameters such as $d_{max}$ (depth of maximum dose), $D_{50}$ (PDD at 50 mm depth), and $D_{100}$ (PDD at 100 mm depth) were analyzed. Moreover, root mean square error (RMSE) values for profiles at $d_{max}$ and 100 mm depth were evaluated. The measured PDDs and profiles between the stealth chamber and CC13 chamber as reference detector had almost comparable. For PDDs, the evaluated dosimetric parameters were observed small difference (<1%) for all energies and field sizes, except for $d_{max}$ less than 2 mm. In addition, the difference of RMSEs for profiles at $d_{max}$ and 100 mm depth was similar for both chambers. This study confirmed that the use of stealth chamber for measuring commission beam data is a feasible as reference chamber for fields ranging from $3{\times}3$ to $20{\times}20cm^2$. Furthermore, it has an advantage with respect to measurement of the small fields (less than $3{\times}3cm^2$ field) although not performed in this study.

Keywords

References

  1. IJ Das, CW Cheng, RJ Watts, A Ahnesjo, J Gibbons, XA Li, et al. Accelerator beam data commissioning equipment and procedures: Report of the TG-106 of the Therapy Physics Committee of the AAPM, Med PhyS. 2008;35(9):4186-4215. https://doi.org/10.1118/1.2969070
  2. J Van Dyk, R Barnett, J Cygler, P Shragge. Commissioning and quality assurance of treatment planning computers, Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1993;26(2):261-273. https://doi.org/10.1016/0360-3016(93)90206-B
  3. R Palta. Linear Accelerator Acceptance Testing and Commissioning, Med Phys. 2003;30(6):1356-1367.
  4. B Fraass, K Doppke, M Hunt, G Kutcher, G Starkschall, R Stern, et al. American Association of Physicists in Medicine Radiation Therapy Committee Task Group 53: quality assurance for clinical radiotherapy treatment planning, Med Phys. 1998;25(10): 1773-1829. https://doi.org/10.1118/1.598373
  5. J Gersh. Stereotactic beam characterization using the IBA stealth chamber reference detector. IBA Dosimetry Whitepaper. 2014.
  6. J Wuerfel. Dose measurements in small fields. Med Phys Int J. 2013;1(1):81-90.
  7. GX Ding, DM Duggan, CW Coffey. Commissioning stereotactic radiosurgery beams using both experimental and theoretical methods. Phys Med Biol. 2006;51(10):2549. https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9155/51/10/013
  8. LAV Quino, CIH Hernandez, O Calvo, M Deweese. Evaluation of a novel reference chabmer "stealth chamber" through Monte Carlo simulations and experimental data, Int J Cancer Ther Oncol. 2015; 3(2):3222. https://doi.org/10.14319/ijcto.32.22
  9. Koo KL, Yang ON, Lim CH, Choi WS, Shin SS, Ahn WS. Dosimetric characteristics of detectors in measurement of beam data for small fields of linear accelerator, Journal of Radiological Science and Technology. 2012;35(3):265-273.
  10. Quino LAV, Hernandez CIH, Calvo O, Rangaraj D. Clinical experience with a novel reference chamber "stealth chamber" by IBA, AIP Conf. Proc 1747, 040006, 2016.
  11. Azcona JD, Barbes B, Moran V, Burguete J. Commissioning of small field size radiosurgery cones in a 6-MV flattening filter-free beam, Med Dosim. 2017;42: 282-288. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meddos.2017.06.003