Journal of the Korean Institute of Traditional Landscape Architecture (한국전통조경학회지)

Korean Institute of Traditional Landscape Architecture (한국전통조경학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Study on the Landscape Planning and Landscape Architecture Construction Principles by the Type Outside Relics

발굴유적 외부공간의 유형별 경관계획 및 조경시공 원칙 연구

  • Shin, Hyun-Sil (Dept. of Architectural, Civil and Landscape Engineering, Hanyang University)
  • 신현실 (한양대학교 공학대학원 건축.토목.조경공학과)
  • Received : 2018.10.18
  • Accepted : 2018.11.23
  • Published : 2018.12.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to present specific standards for landscape planning and construction applicable to landscaping areas in various historical sites. The results are as follows: First, the types of historical sites are classified according to their preservation status and processing techniques, and the classification according to their status is divided into those that have been buried underground, such as those that have been exposed to the ground, such as buildings and structures, and those that have a reputation or a record of the sites. The classification according to the wartime processing technique was classified by such techniques as closures that isolate the site, penetration that can be seen on the site, and overlays where a separate protection facility is installed on the site. Second, the principles of landscape planning for display of historical sites are divided into the items that make up the historical site, surface treatment of the sites, tree planting, and installation of facilities. If the site is not a circular space, the area separating the space by different materials between the components is required. In the event that preservation of the historical site is required, it is deemed desirable to use the soil, and to do so, the use of grasses and shrubs is effectively considered to be effective. The introduction of plants and plants should be considered according to the nature of the space. Depending on the area and nature of the monument, the facility is required to take a cautious approach by reviewing its influence on the landscape and the additional excavation of the monument. Third, the readjustment method derived as a result of looking at the landscaping principle in the historical site space was classified as conservation of status, installation of protection facilities, burial, restoration, relocation, and reproduction. Preservation of the status quo is essential for limited landscape planning and should not affect the prototype of existing relics. The protection facility shall be installed where necessary to protect the relics, and when the soil is formed, the surface treatment shall be required to remove trees that could damage the site and prevent soil and soil oil from being lost after the site. The restoration shall establish a landscaping plan according to the circular preservation based on the clues to the circle. The transfer requires a landscaping plan to create an environment similar to the outer space of an existing site and should be able to highlight the value or location of the original site. The reenactment should have a landscaping plan to revive the landscape and atmosphere of the past for the now-defunct remains. Fourth, landscaping can simultaneously satisfy the preservation of excavation sites and the increase in exhibition effects. In order to protect the traces of the past and vitalize the site of the ruins today, specific measures are required, the creation of a park for historical sites that preserve the functions and value of the relics, and the formation of a shape of linked contents can be suggested as alternatives.

본 연구는 다양한 유적지 공간에서의 경관계획 및 시공기준에 대해 조경 분야에 적용 가능한 구체적 경관계획과 시공기준을 살펴보았으며, 이에 도출된 결과는 다음과 같다. 첫째, 유적지의 유형은 보존상태 및 처리기법에 따라 분류되는데 보존 상태에 따른 분류는 건조물이나 구조물 등 지상에 노출된 유적과 매장문화재와 같이 지하에 매장된 유적, 유적에 대한 기록이나 명성이 전해져 오고 있으나 장소만 남은 유적 등으로 구분된다. 전시 처리기법에 따른 분류는 유적 주변을 격리하는 폐쇄와 유적 지상에서 관람할 수 있는 관통, 별도의 보호시설을 유적 위에 설치하는 중첩 등의 기법들로 분류되었다. 둘째, 유적지 관람 전시를 위한 조경계획의 원칙을 수립해보면, 유적을 구성하는 항목으로 영역의 구분, 유적의 표면처리, 수목식재, 시설물 설치 등으로 구분된다. 유적은 원형의 공간이 아닐 경우 구성요소간의 소재를 달리하여 공간을 구분하는 영역의 구분이 필요하다. 유구의 보존이 필요할 경우 복토가 바람직하며, 이를 위해서는 잔디나 관목류 등을 사용하는 것이 효율적으로 판단된다. 수목의 식재는 공간의 성격에 따라 도입을 검토해야 한다. 시설물은 유적의 영역과 성격에 따라 경관에 미치는 영향과 유적의 추가 발굴 등을 검토하여 신중한 접근이 요구된다. 셋째, 유적지 공간에서의 조경시공 원칙을 살펴본 결과 도출된 정비방법은 현상보존, 보호시설 설치, 복토, 수복, 복원, 이전, 재현 등으로 분류되었다. 현상보존은 제한적인 조경계획이 필수적이며, 기존 유적의 원형에 영향을 미치지 않아야 한다. 보호시설은 유적의 보호를 위해 불가피할 경우 설치되어야 하며, 복토가 이루어질 경우 유적을 훼손할 수 있는 수목을 제거하고 성토 후 토사유실방지를 위해 표면처리가 요구된다. 수복은 원형에 대한 단서를 근거로 원형보존에 준하는 조경계획의 수립이 이루어져야 한다. 이전은 기존 유적의 외부공간과 유사한 환경을 조성하기 위한 조경계획이 필요하며, 본래 유적의 가치나 장소성을 부각할 수 있어야 한다. 재현은 현재 사라진 유적에 대해 과거의 경관과 분위기를 살릴 수 있는 조경계획이 수립되어야 한다. 넷째, 조경 분야는 발굴유적의 보존 및 전시효과 상승을 동시에 만족시킬 수 있는 분야로서 과거의 흔적을 보호하고 오늘날 폐허의 장소에 생기를 부여하기 위해 구체적 방안의 모색이 요구되며, 유적의 기능과 가치를 살린 유적지 공원 조성, 연계콘텐츠의 형상화 등이 대안으로 제시될 수 있다.

Keywords

HJOHBR_2018_v36n4_58_f0001.png 이미지

Figure 1. Gyeonju Yonggang-dong wonji Yujeok(Palace Garden Pond Site in Yonggang-dong, Gyeonju) is used as a Vegetable Garden after Piling up Soil[17]

HJOHBR_2018_v36n4_58_f0002.png 이미지

Figure 2. Exposure Figures of the Hyeeumwon Inn Site, Paju[17]

HJOHBR_2018_v36n4_58_f0003.png 이미지

Figure 3. Conservation of Exposed Remains on the Ground

HJOHBR_2018_v36n4_58_f0004.png 이미지

Figure 4. Case of Preservation of Underground Ruins

Table 1. Terminology Related to the Historic Site

HJOHBR_2018_v36n4_58_t0001.png 이미지

Table 2 . Categorization of Relics according to State of Preservation

HJOHBR_2018_v36n4_58_t0002.png 이미지

Table 3. Contents of Maintenance by Type of Historic Site

HJOHBR_2018_v36n4_58_t0003.png 이미지

References

  1. Cultural Heritage Adminstration(2018). A Planning of Long-Term Road map Using Cultural Heritages.
  2. Rho, J. H., Park, J. S. and Choi, J. H.(2016). Assumptions on the Location of Chanokbyeong and Saahm Park Soon's Garden Remains. Journal of Korean Institute of Traditional Landscape Architecture. 34(4): 37-50. https://doi.org/10.14700/KITLA.2016.34.4.037
  3. Lee, S. H. and Lee, H. L.(2005). Types and Characteristics of Chio, Chi-Won's Relics and His Cultural Landscapes. Journal of Korean Institute of Traditional Landscape Architecture. 23(2): 60-72.
  4. Kim, M. H. and Sung, J. S.(2015). A Study of Planning for Gumswae-dong Garden Heritage Maintenance. Journal of Korean Institute of Traditional Landscape Architecture. 33(1): 41-51. https://doi.org/10.14700/KITLA.2015.33.1.041
  5. Kim, M. H. and Sung, J. S.(2015). A Study of Planning for Sujeong-dong Garden Heritage Maintenance. Journal of Korean Institute of Traditional Landscape Architecture. 33(2): 12-20. https://doi.org/10.14700/KITLA2015.33.2.012
  6. Kim, H. G. and Kim, Y. M.(2010). A Study of the Garden Remains in mountain Bukak in Dohwadong, Seoul. Journal of Korean Institute of Traditional Landscape Architecture. 28(1): 66-80.
  7. Ahn, G. B.(2008). A Study on the Restoration for Gyeongsan Sigicdan's Remains. Journal of Korean Institute of Traditional Landscape Architecture. 26(3): 8-16.
  8. Lee, J. K., Paek, N. Y. and Kim, S. R.(2003). A Study of Enhancing Recognition of Disappearing Cultural Relics. Journal of Korean Institute of Traditional Landscape Architecture. 21(2): 18-29.
  9. Kim, M. S., Yeo, H. J., Choi, J. H. and Lee, J. G.(2004). A Study for Enhancing Recognition of Cultural Relics that have Disappeared in Jongno-Gu, Seoul. Journal of Korean Institute of Traditional Landscape Architecture. 22(1): 61-69.
  10. Kim, C. G.(2006). The Improvement of Legal System and Policy for Local Cultural Properties Conservation and Promotion. Hanyang law Review. 19(-):167-183.
  11. Kim, H. G. and Choi, K. S.(2012). A Study of Evaluation Indices for Selection Castle Remains Maintenance and Restoration Sections. Journal of Korean Institute of Traditional Landscape Architecture. 31(1): 1-13.
  12. Kim, Y. M. and Kim, C. S.(2006). A Study on the Maintenance Method for Historic Relics Excavated at Bu-So Sanseong. Journal of Korean Institute of Traditional Landscape Architecture. 24(2): 70-85.
  13. Lee, H. J.(2015). Planning for Archaeological Relics Excavated in City Center. Master's thesis of Seoul National University.
  14. Kim, C. J.(2013). Understanding the Conservation and Maintenance of Historic Sites. Seoul: Nulwa
  15. Kim, G. S.(2013). Preservation and Utilization of Cultural Heritage. Seoul: the drift of time
  16. UNESCO(1990). CHARTER FOR THE PROTECTION AND MANAGEMENT OF THE ARCHAEOLOGICAL HERITAGE
  17. Cultural Heritage Adminstration(2006). Report on the reclassification by category designated as "Wonji".
  18. National Research Institute of Cultural Heritage(2009). Foreign survey data collection for preservation and utilization of historic sites.
  19. Byeon, C. B.(2015). An aesthetic analysis of the ruins of a historical site. The Journal of Human Studies. 37(1): 175-203
  20. Education center for Traditional Culture in Korea National University of Cultural Heritage(2012). Training Material for Cultural Heritage Manager's Course.
  21. Cultural Heritage Adminstration(2011). A Guidebook of the Histiric Sites Conservation in Korea.
  22. Cultural Heritage Adminstration(2014). Standard specification of Cultural Heritage Maintenance.
  23. Lee, W. H.(2016). Problems with the Application of the Concept of 'Original Form' to Natural Heritage. Journal of Cultural Hertage. 49(1):166-177.