Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.14700/KITLA.2018.36.4.058

A Study on the Landscape Planning and Landscape Architecture Construction Principles by the Type Outside Relics  

Shin, Hyun-Sil (Dept. of Architectural, Civil and Landscape Engineering, Hanyang University)
Publication Information
Journal of the Korean Institute of Traditional Landscape Architecture / v.36, no.4, 2018 , pp. 58-69 More about this Journal
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to present specific standards for landscape planning and construction applicable to landscaping areas in various historical sites. The results are as follows: First, the types of historical sites are classified according to their preservation status and processing techniques, and the classification according to their status is divided into those that have been buried underground, such as those that have been exposed to the ground, such as buildings and structures, and those that have a reputation or a record of the sites. The classification according to the wartime processing technique was classified by such techniques as closures that isolate the site, penetration that can be seen on the site, and overlays where a separate protection facility is installed on the site. Second, the principles of landscape planning for display of historical sites are divided into the items that make up the historical site, surface treatment of the sites, tree planting, and installation of facilities. If the site is not a circular space, the area separating the space by different materials between the components is required. In the event that preservation of the historical site is required, it is deemed desirable to use the soil, and to do so, the use of grasses and shrubs is effectively considered to be effective. The introduction of plants and plants should be considered according to the nature of the space. Depending on the area and nature of the monument, the facility is required to take a cautious approach by reviewing its influence on the landscape and the additional excavation of the monument. Third, the readjustment method derived as a result of looking at the landscaping principle in the historical site space was classified as conservation of status, installation of protection facilities, burial, restoration, relocation, and reproduction. Preservation of the status quo is essential for limited landscape planning and should not affect the prototype of existing relics. The protection facility shall be installed where necessary to protect the relics, and when the soil is formed, the surface treatment shall be required to remove trees that could damage the site and prevent soil and soil oil from being lost after the site. The restoration shall establish a landscaping plan according to the circular preservation based on the clues to the circle. The transfer requires a landscaping plan to create an environment similar to the outer space of an existing site and should be able to highlight the value or location of the original site. The reenactment should have a landscaping plan to revive the landscape and atmosphere of the past for the now-defunct remains. Fourth, landscaping can simultaneously satisfy the preservation of excavation sites and the increase in exhibition effects. In order to protect the traces of the past and vitalize the site of the ruins today, specific measures are required, the creation of a park for historical sites that preserve the functions and value of the relics, and the formation of a shape of linked contents can be suggested as alternatives.
Keywords
Landscape planning and construction; Preservation of original form; Protection of trace; The site of the ruins;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 2  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Kim, H. G. and Kim, Y. M.(2010). A Study of the Garden Remains in mountain Bukak in Dohwadong, Seoul. Journal of Korean Institute of Traditional Landscape Architecture. 28(1): 66-80.
2 Ahn, G. B.(2008). A Study on the Restoration for Gyeongsan Sigicdan's Remains. Journal of Korean Institute of Traditional Landscape Architecture. 26(3): 8-16.
3 Lee, J. K., Paek, N. Y. and Kim, S. R.(2003). A Study of Enhancing Recognition of Disappearing Cultural Relics. Journal of Korean Institute of Traditional Landscape Architecture. 21(2): 18-29.
4 Kim, M. S., Yeo, H. J., Choi, J. H. and Lee, J. G.(2004). A Study for Enhancing Recognition of Cultural Relics that have Disappeared in Jongno-Gu, Seoul. Journal of Korean Institute of Traditional Landscape Architecture. 22(1): 61-69.
5 Kim, C. G.(2006). The Improvement of Legal System and Policy for Local Cultural Properties Conservation and Promotion. Hanyang law Review. 19(-):167-183.
6 Kim, H. G. and Choi, K. S.(2012). A Study of Evaluation Indices for Selection Castle Remains Maintenance and Restoration Sections. Journal of Korean Institute of Traditional Landscape Architecture. 31(1): 1-13.
7 Kim, Y. M. and Kim, C. S.(2006). A Study on the Maintenance Method for Historic Relics Excavated at Bu-So Sanseong. Journal of Korean Institute of Traditional Landscape Architecture. 24(2): 70-85.
8 Lee, H. J.(2015). Planning for Archaeological Relics Excavated in City Center. Master's thesis of Seoul National University.
9 Kim, C. J.(2013). Understanding the Conservation and Maintenance of Historic Sites. Seoul: Nulwa
10 Kim, G. S.(2013). Preservation and Utilization of Cultural Heritage. Seoul: the drift of time
11 UNESCO(1990). CHARTER FOR THE PROTECTION AND MANAGEMENT OF THE ARCHAEOLOGICAL HERITAGE
12 Cultural Heritage Adminstration(2006). Report on the reclassification by category designated as "Wonji".
13 National Research Institute of Cultural Heritage(2009). Foreign survey data collection for preservation and utilization of historic sites.
14 Byeon, C. B.(2015). An aesthetic analysis of the ruins of a historical site. The Journal of Human Studies. 37(1): 175-203
15 Education center for Traditional Culture in Korea National University of Cultural Heritage(2012). Training Material for Cultural Heritage Manager's Course.
16 Cultural Heritage Adminstration(2011). A Guidebook of the Histiric Sites Conservation in Korea.
17 Cultural Heritage Adminstration(2014). Standard specification of Cultural Heritage Maintenance.
18 Lee, W. H.(2016). Problems with the Application of the Concept of 'Original Form' to Natural Heritage. Journal of Cultural Hertage. 49(1):166-177.
19 Rho, J. H., Park, J. S. and Choi, J. H.(2016). Assumptions on the Location of Chanokbyeong and Saahm Park Soon's Garden Remains. Journal of Korean Institute of Traditional Landscape Architecture. 34(4): 37-50.   DOI
20 Cultural Heritage Adminstration(2018). A Planning of Long-Term Road map Using Cultural Heritages.
21 Lee, S. H. and Lee, H. L.(2005). Types and Characteristics of Chio, Chi-Won's Relics and His Cultural Landscapes. Journal of Korean Institute of Traditional Landscape Architecture. 23(2): 60-72.
22 Kim, M. H. and Sung, J. S.(2015). A Study of Planning for Gumswae-dong Garden Heritage Maintenance. Journal of Korean Institute of Traditional Landscape Architecture. 33(1): 41-51.   DOI
23 Kim, M. H. and Sung, J. S.(2015). A Study of Planning for Sujeong-dong Garden Heritage Maintenance. Journal of Korean Institute of Traditional Landscape Architecture. 33(2): 12-20.   DOI