감성과학 (Science of Emotion and Sensibility)

  • 제21권1호
  • /
  • Pages.165-176
  • /
  • 2018
  • /
  • 1226-8593(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2383-613X(eISSN)
한국감성과학회 (Korean Society for Emotion and Sensibility)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

농특산물 직거래판매시설에 관한 현장중심의 참여디자인 효과: 참여자의 의식변화를 중심으로

The Effect of Field-Based Participation Design on Agricultural Direct Sales Facilities: Process Change of Awareness on Participant

  • 서애은 (전북대학교 산업디자인학과) ;
  • 홍정표 (전북대학교 산업디자인학과) ;
  • 하은영 (전북대학교 산업디자인학과) ;
  • 채혜성 (농촌진흥청 국립농업과학원)
  • 투고 : 2018.01.17
  • 심사 : 2018.03.22
  • 발행 : 2018.03.31
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

변화하는 사회에 따라 디자인 과정에서도 사용자의 참여를 요구하는 참여디자인이 증가하지만, 실제 디자인개발에서 발생하는 문제 개선이나 참여디자인의 효과를 나타내는 연구는 미비한 실정이다. 이에 사용자 현장을 중심으로 한 참여디자인을 통해 참여자의 의식변화 측면에서 효과를 확인하고자, 본 연구에서는 농촌의 농특산물 직거래판매시설을 대상으로 이해관계자 모두가 참여한 참여디자인 프로그램을 통해 참여자 의식변화를 조사하여 현장중심의 참여디자인 효과를 확인하였다. 먼저 문헌고찰 통해 참여디자인의 이해와 연구동향을 살핀 다음 효과분석을 위한 효과 검증모델을 활용하여 설문 문항을 개발하고, 참여디자인 프로그램의 디자인워크숍을 구성하여 이를 현장에 적용하였다. 효과를 분석하기 위한 참여자 의식변화 조사는 프로그램의 사전과 사후에 동기, 지식, 인식, 기능, 참여의 영역에서 디자인전공자를 대상으로 설문조사를 진행하고, 개방형 질문에서 추가로 결과를 보완하여 참여디자인의 효과를 파악하였다. 그 결과, 참여디자인 프로그램을 통해 참여자들은 직거래판매시설에 대한 지식과 기능의 영역에서 효과가 있었고, 참여디자인의 결과에 높은 만족감과 공동 작업의 중요성을 느끼는 것으로 나타났으며, 운영과정에서는 농촌의 현장특성에 맞게 프로그램의 충분한 일정계획 마련과 원활한 디자인 작업을 위한 환경조성이 필요한 것으로 나타났다.

A demand for user's participation in the designing process, which is called the participation design, is increasing with social change. Practically, however, there is lack of researches on the improvement of the problem in actual design development and participation design effect. In order to understand the field-based participation design effect in view of user's change of awareness on participation design, this study carried out a survey on the change of awareness through a design workshop in which all stakeholders have participated on the subject of agricultural direct sales facilities as a part of participation design programs. Many references were reviewed first to understand the participation design principles and their current research trend. Next, the questionnaire was developed using an effectiveness verification model for an effective analysis. A design workshop as one of the participation design programs was organized and applied for the field response. In order to analyze the effect, the survey on participants' change of awareness was carried out before and after the program. The survey questionnaires were about motivation, knowledge, recognition, function, and participation and asked the design study graduates. The participation design effect was supplemented by additional open questions. As a consequence, the participants in the participation design program showed the noticeable effect in knowledge and function about the agricultural direct sales facilities. It was found that they were also highly satisfied with the participation design result and they recognized an importance of collaboration. This study also showed that a sufficient time schedule considering agricultural village life should be given for a smooth operation of the program and also a working environment is necessary for designing work.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Ahn, H. C. & Park, S. H. (2009). Local goverance and participatory design process: A case study of mangwon bike path. Journal of The Architectural Institute of Korea Plannin&Design, 25(8), 47-56.
  2. Amstrong, H. & Stojmirovic, Z. (2012). PARTICIPATE: Designing with user-generated content. (Choi, J. E., Trans). Seoul: Vizandbiz.
  3. Baek, J. S. (2003). Participatory design approach to interface design for children: With emphasis on the design. Unpublished Master's thesis, KAIST, Daejeon, Korea.
  4. Chae, H. S., Do, K. R., Jin, H. R., Hong, K. W., Lee, D. G., Ahn, O. S., & Jo, L. H. (2013). Charrette for improving agricultural product package design for rural village: Process development and impact on designer. Korean Society of Rural Planning, 19(2), 21-33. https://doi.org/10.7851/ksrp.2013.19.2.021
  5. Chae, H. S., Ha, E. Y., & Seo, A. E. (2017). A study on the improvements of the package design 6th industrailized agro-food using Nvivo. Journal of Culture Product & Design, 50, 101-114. https://doi.org/10.18555/kicpd.2017.50.9
  6. Cho, H. B. (2013). A study on the improvement on outdoor play environment in apartment through the participatory design method. Unpublished Master's thesis, University of Seoul, Seoul, Korea.
  7. Choi, K. R. (2006). Development and evaluation of the family relations enhancement program: Applied to rural women in Gyeonggi do. Korean J. Community Living Science, 17(2), 31-48.
  8. Choi, S. S. (2016). A study on implementation system of 'Design Charrette' for sustainable community design: Focused on sensitive urban infill charrette in Canada. Journal of the Korea Academia-Industrial Cooperation Society, 17(12), 153-161. https://doi.org/10.5762/KAIS.2016.17.12.153
  9. Hyun, E. R. (2014). The efficaciousness of the STEAM (science, technology, engineering, arts & mathematics) education for elementary, focused on convergence in arts: Focusing on student engagement in art subject. Korea Design Knowledge Society, 29, 333-342.
  10. James P. S. (1980). Participant observation. Belmont: Harcourt Brace College Publishers.
  11. Jin, H. R. & Jo, L. H. (2014). Sixth industry provider of rural tourism village farmers for activation analysis of agricultural specialties package design. Bulletin of Korean Society of Basic Design & Art, 15(2), 573-581.
  12. Jin, H. R., Jo, L. H., & Chae, H. S. (2016). Consumer behavior evaluation of agricultural specialty packaging design improvement. Journal of Korean Institute of Culture Product & Design, 45, 69-78. https://doi.org/10.18555/kicpd.2016.45.7
  13. Jung, J. W. (2017). Changes in consumption life and consumer education in the fourth industrial revolution. Journal of Korean Home Economics Education Association, 29(3), 89-104. https://doi.org/10.19031/jkheea.2017.09.29.3.89
  14. Jung, K. H. (2016). Effect of storytelling-based portfolio learning program for design achievement. Korea Science & Art Forum, 26, 401-410. https://doi.org/10.17548/ksaf.2016.12.26.401
  15. Kim, C. K., Ann, T. M., Kim, I. H., Lee, J. Y., Kim, S. J., Chae, H. S., Lee, Y., Lee, J. W., Kim, M. W., Shin, M. J., Park, H. I., & Cho, K. J. (2010). Development and application of participatory ecological restoration program for BaigDooDaeGahn. The Environmental Education, 23(2), 1-15.
  16. Kim, D. E. & Lee, K. P. (2011). Towards to collective design activity through mass collaboration: A review of relevant websites and articles. Journal oh the HCI Society of Korea, 6(2), 11-20. https://doi.org/10.17210/jhsk.2011.11.6.2.11
  17. Kim, G. M. (2015). A study on package design analysis and development strategy research. for activating the 6th industrialization of agriculture focusing on the Japanese 6th industrialization of agriculture practices. Journal of Korean Institute of Culture Product & Design, 41, 149-159.
  18. Kim, U. C. & Suh, J. H. (2013). Study on package design development strategy of agricultural products according to consumption and prefernce survey. Journal of Digital Design, 13(3), 301-310.
  19. Kwack, D. W. & Lee, S. H. (2011). A study on the process evaluation of participation design for a community. Journal of korea Society of Design Science, 24(4), 119-130.
  20. Lee, G. S. & Jang, S. O. (2010). Practical problemfocused instructional design and it's perception applying universal design. Journal of The Korean Home Economics Education Association, 22(2), 155-169.
  21. Lee, M. K., & Jung, H. B. (2014). A formative study on perspectives of industrial designer-user design collaboration: Focusing on cooperative role of design through the case of transportation for the Burning Man festival in the US. Journal of Digital Design, 14(3), 105-114. https://doi.org/10.17280/jdd.2014.14.3.011
  22. Lundmark, S. (in press). Design project failures: Outcomes and gains of participation in design. Design Studies. DOI:10.1016/j.destud.2017.07.002
  23. Mackrill, J., Marshall, P., Payne, S. R., Dimitrokali, E., & Cain, R. (2016). Using a bespoke situated digital kiosk to encourage user participation in healthcare environment design. Applied Ergonomics, 59(Part A), 342-356. DOI:10.1016/j.apergo.2016.08.005
  24. McEvoy, S., van de Ven, F. H. M., Blind, M. W., & Slinger, J. H. (2017). Planning support tools and their effects in participatory urban adaptation workshops. Journal of Environmental Management, 207, 319-333. DOI:10.1016/j.jenvman.2017.10.041
  25. Meiland, F. J. M., Hattink, B. J. J., Overmars-Marx, T., De Boer, M. E., Jedlitschka, A., Ebben, P. W. G., Stalpers-Croeze, I. I. N. W., Flick, S., van der Leeuw, J., Karkowski, I. P., & Droes, R. M. (2014). Participation of end users in the design of assistive technology for people with mild to severe cognitive problems; the European Rosetta project. International Psychogeriatrics, 26(5), 769-779. DOI:10.1017/S1041610214000088
  26. Noh, Y. H., Kim, T. K., & Kim, D. S. (2015). Investigating change of users' perception of privacy pre- and post-education on library user privacy. Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, 32(1), 63-84. https://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2015.32.1.063
  27. Paik, J. W. (2016) Color Image analysis of participatory design applied school restroom: Case study on M.elementary school and K.middle school in Seoul, Journal of Korea Society of Color Studies, 30(3), 101-110. https://doi.org/10.17289/jkscs.30.3.201608.101
  28. Park, J. Y. (2005). Characteristics of Residents' Participation Program in Design and Implementing Process of Rural Villages Resting Area. Unpublished Master's thesis, Chonnam National University, Gwangju, Korea.
  29. Park, N. C. (2010). A case study on field-centered education of user experience design focused on application of educational curriculum. Archives of Design Research, 23(7), 30-49.
  30. Park, N. Y., Lee, G. H., & Koh, I. L. (2015). A study on community participation design process for public building: Focused on analyzed case of educational research facility. Journal of the Korea Society of Design Culture, 21(3), 321-337.
  31. Reich, Y., Konda, S. L., Monarch, I. A., Levy, S. N., & Subrahmanian, E. (1996). Varieties and issues of participation and design. Design Studies, 17(2), 165-180. https://doi.org/10.1016/0142-694X(95)00000-H
  32. Sanoff, H. (2000). Community participation methods in design and planning. New York: Wiley.
  33. Shin, N. M. (2010). A case study on the efficacy and methods of user participatory design in the refurbishment of school spaces. Journal of Educational Technology, 26(4), 171-189. https://doi.org/10.17232/KSET.26.4.171
  34. Thissen, W. A. H., & Twaalfhoven, P. G. J. (1999). Towards a conceptual structure for evaluating policy analytic activities. European Journal of Operational Research, 129(3), 627-649. DOI:10.1016/S0377-2217(99)00470-1
  35. Yoon, J. Y. (2014). A Study on public campaign design through participation design method. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea.