DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Numerical Analysis on the Transient Load Characteristics of Supersonic Steam Impinging Jet using LES Turbulence Model

LES 난류모델을 이용한 초음속 증기 충돌제트의 과도하중 특성에 대한 수치해석 연구

  • Received : 2018.11.21
  • Accepted : 2018.12.18
  • Published : 2018.12.30

Abstract

In the case of high-energy line breaks in nuclear power plants, supersonic steam jet is formed due to the rapid depressurization. The steam jet can cause impingement load on the adjacent structures, piping systems and components. In order to secure the design integrity of the nuclear power plant, it is necessary to evaluate the load characteristics of the steam jet generated by high-energy pipe rupture. In the design process of nuclear power plant, jet impingement load evaluation was usually performed based on ANSI/ANS 58.2. However, U.S. NRC recently pointed out that ANSI/ANS 58.2 oversimplifies the jet behavior and that some assumptions are non-conservative. In addition, it is recommended that dynamic analysis techniques should be applied to consider transient load characteristics. Therefore, it is necessary to establish an evaluation methodology that can analyze the dynamic load characteristics of steam jet ejected when high energy pipe breaks. This research group has developed and validated the CFD analysis methodology to evaluate the transient behavior of supersonic impinging jet in the previous study. In this study, numerical study on the transient load characteristics of supersonic steam jet impingement was carried out and amplitude and frequency analysis of transient jet load was performed.

Keywords

HGHRB5_2018_v14n2_77_f0001.png 이미지

Fig. 1 Qualitative behavior of critical mass flux

HGHRB5_2018_v14n2_77_f0002.png 이미지

Fig. 2 Schematic of the rupture pipe and target plate

HGHRB5_2018_v14n2_77_f0003.png 이미지

Fig. 3 Mach number contour of steady-state free jet

HGHRB5_2018_v14n2_77_f0004.png 이미지

Fig. 4 Snapshot of pressure contour (impinging jet)

HGHRB5_2018_v14n2_77_f0005.png 이미지

Fig. 5 Snapshot of Mach number contour (impinging jet)

HGHRB5_2018_v14n2_77_f0006.png 이미지

Fig. 6 Time-averaged impinging force

HGHRB5_2018_v14n2_77_f0007.png 이미지

Fig. 7 Normalized amplitude(RMS) of impinging force

HGHRB5_2018_v14n2_77_f0008.png 이미지

Fig. 8 Variation of the jet impingement load with respect to time

HGHRB5_2018_v14n2_77_f0009.png 이미지

Fig. 9 FFT results (load amplitude vs. frequency)

HGHRB5_2018_v14n2_77_f0010.png 이미지

Fig. 10 Dominant frequency of the jet impingement load with respect to the axial distance of the target plate

HGHRB5_2018_v14n2_77_f0011.png 이미지

Fig. 11 Time-averaged impinging pressure

HGHRB5_2018_v14n2_77_f0012.png 이미지

Fig. 12 Normalized amplitude(RMS) of impinging pressure

HGHRB5_2018_v14n2_77_f0013.png 이미지

Fig. 13 Normalized amplitude(RMS) of impinging pressure

HGHRB5_2018_v14n2_77_f0014.png 이미지

Fig. 14 Variation of the impinging pressure with respect to time (R/D=0)

HGHRB5_2018_v14n2_77_f0015.png 이미지

Fig. 15 FFT results (pressure amplitude vs. frequency, R/D=0)

HGHRB5_2018_v14n2_77_f0016.png 이미지

Fig. 16 Variation of the impinging pressure with respect to time (R/D=1)

HGHRB5_2018_v14n2_77_f0017.png 이미지

Fig. 17 FFT results (pressure amplitude vs. frequency, R/D=1)

Table 1 Dominant frequency of the jet impingement load

HGHRB5_2018_v14n2_77_t0001.png 이미지

Table 2 Dominant frequency of impinging pressure

HGHRB5_2018_v14n2_77_t0002.png 이미지

References

  1. ANS, 1998, "Design Basis for Protection of Light Water Nuclear Power Plants against the Effects of Postulated Pipe Rupture," ANSI/ANS-58.2-1988(W1998).
  2. USNRC, 2007, "Determination of Rupture Locations and Dynamics Effects Associated with the Postulated Rupture of Piping(Rev.2)," U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC, NUREG-0800.
  3. Wallis, G., 2004, "The ANSI/ANS Standard 58.2-1988: Two Phase Jet Model".
  4. Ransom., V., 2004, "Comments on GSI-191 Models for Debris Generation".
  5. Oh, S., Choi, D. K., Kim, W. T., Chang, Y. and Choi, C., 2017, "Numerical Analysis on Feedback Mechanism of Supersonic Impinging Jet using LES," Trans. of the KPVP, Vol. 13, No. 2, pp. 51-59.
  6. Johnson, R. W., 1998, "The Handbook of Fluid Dynamics," Springer, pp.17-32-17-33.
  7. ANSYS, Inc., 2010, "ANSYS Fluent User Guide".