DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Preliminary Study on Effect of Baseline Correction in Acceleration Excitation Method on Finite Element Elastic-Plastic Time-History Seismic Analysis Results of Nuclear Safety Class I Components

원전 안전 1등급 기기의 유한요소 탄소성 시간이력 지진해석 결과에 미치는 가속도 가진 방법 내 기준선 조정의 영향에 대한 예비연구

  • Received : 2018.11.19
  • Accepted : 2018.12.19
  • Published : 2018.12.30

Abstract

The paper presents preliminary investigation results for the effect of the baseline correction in the acceleration excitation method on finite element seismic analysis results (such as accumulated equivalent plastic strain, equivalent plastic strain considering cyclic plasticity, von Mises effective stress, etc) of nuclear safety Class I components. For investigation, finite element elastic-plastic time-history seismic analysis is performed for a surge line including a pressurizer lower head, a pressurizer surge nozzle, a surge piping, and a hot leg surge nozzle using the Chaboche hardening model. Analysis is performed for various seismic loading methods such as acceleration excitation methods with and without the baseline correction, and a displacement excitation method. Comparing finite element analysis results, the effect of the baseline correction is investigated. As a result of the investigation, it is identified that finite element analysis results using the three methods do not show significant difference.

Keywords

HGHRB5_2018_v14n2_69_f0001.png 이미지

Fig. 1 Schematic configuration and lay-out of a surge line.

HGHRB5_2018_v14n2_69_f0002.png 이미지

Fig. 2 Acceleration time-history at each support point.

HGHRB5_2018_v14n2_69_f0003.png 이미지

Fig. 3 Displacement time-history at each support point.

HGHRB5_2018_v14n2_69_f0004.png 이미지

Fig. 4. Finite element model of the surge line.

HGHRB5_2018_v14n2_69_f0005.png 이미지

Fig. 5 Accumulated equivalent plastic strain distribution of the surge line calculated applying the acceleration time history with baseline correction.

HGHRB5_2018_v14n2_69_f0006.png 이미지

Fig. 6 Equivalent plastic strain distribution considering cyclic plasticity of the surge line calculated applying the acceleration time history with the baseline correction.

HGHRB5_2018_v14n2_69_f0007.png 이미지

Fig. 7 von Mises effective stress distribution of the surge line calculated applying the acceleration time history with the baseline correction.

HGHRB5_2018_v14n2_69_f0008.png 이미지

Fig. 8 Comparison of the displacement distributions at final time among the various cases.

HGHRB5_2018_v14n2_69_f0009.png 이미지

Fig. 9. Variation of the accumulated equivalent plastic strain time histories on the maximum value generation location according to application of the baseline correction and the acceleration/ displacement time histories.

HGHRB5_2018_v14n2_69_f0010.png 이미지

Fig. 10 Variation of the equivalent plastic strain time histories considering cyclic plasticity on the maximum value generation location according to application of the baseline correction and the acceleration/displacement time histories.

HGHRB5_2018_v14n2_69_f0011.png 이미지

Fig. 11 Variation of the von Mises effective stress time histories on the maximum value generation location according to application of the baseline correction and the acceleration/displacement time histories.

Table 1. Physical properties of SA508 Gr.3 Cl.1 and SA182 TP316 at 316 oC.

HGHRB5_2018_v14n2_69_t0001.png 이미지

Table 2 Chaboche hardening model parameters of SA508 Gr.3 Cl.1 and SA182 TP316 at 316˚C13).

HGHRB5_2018_v14n2_69_t0002.png 이미지

Table 3 Comparison of the maximum accumulated equivalent plastic strain value vs. application of the baseline correction and the acceleration/displacement time histories.

HGHRB5_2018_v14n2_69_t0003.png 이미지

Table 4 Comparison of the maximum equivalent plastic strain (considering cyclic plasticity) value and maximum value generation time vs. application of the baseline correction and the acceleration/displacement time histories.

HGHRB5_2018_v14n2_69_t0004.png 이미지

Table 5 Comparison of the maximum von Mises effective stress value and maximum value generation time vs. application of the baseline correction and the acceleration/displacement time histories.

HGHRB5_2018_v14n2_69_t0005.png 이미지

References

  1. USNRC, 2011, Recommendations for Enhancing Reactor Safety in the 21st Century: The Near Term Task Force Review of Insights from the Fukushima Dai-Ichi Accident.
  2. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2016_Kumamoto_earthquakes.
  3. https://www.ytn.co.kr/_ln/0103_201609122130433861
  4. ASME B&PV Code Committee, 2007, ASME B&PV Code, Sec.III, Div.1, Subsec.NB, Article NB-3656.
  5. ASME B&PV Code Committee, 2007, ASME B&PV Code, Sec.III, Div.1, Appendices, App.F.
  6. http://www.todayenergy.kr/news/articleView.html?idxno=119948
  7. 이대영, 박흥배, 김진원, 류호완, 김윤재, 2016, 설계 기준초과지진 하의 원전 배관 구조 건전성 평가를 위한 변형률 기반 방법 검토, 한국압력기기공학회논문집, Vol.12, No.2, pp.66-70.
  8. 최인길, 2017, 설계초과지지에 대한 원전 지진안전성평가 기술 고찰 및 제언, 한국압력기기공학회 논문집, Vol.13, No.1, pp.1-15 https://doi.org/10.20466/KPVP.2017.13.1.001
  9. 김종성, 이석현, 권형도, 오창영, 2017, 동적 시간이력 탄소성 지진해석을 위한 레일레이 감쇠계수 결정 방법 고찰, 한국압력기기공학회 논문집, Vol.13, No.2, pp.38-43. https://doi.org/10.20466/KPVP.2017.13.2.038
  10. KAERI, 2008, An Application of the Baseline Correction Technique for Correcting Distorted Seismic Acceleration Time Histories, KAERI/TR-3553/2008.
  11. Dassault Systems, 2017, User's Manuals for Simulia, Ver.6.17.
  12. KHNP, 2018, APR1400 Design Control Document and Environmental Report.
  13. J.L. Chaboche, 1986, Time-independent constitutive theories for cyclic plasticity, International Journal of Plasticity, Vol.2, pp. 149-188. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-6419(86)90010-0