Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.20466/KPVP.2018.14.2.069

Preliminary Study on Effect of Baseline Correction in Acceleration Excitation Method on Finite Element Elastic-Plastic Time-History Seismic Analysis Results of Nuclear Safety Class I Components  

Kim, Jong-Sung (세종대학교)
Park, Sang-Hyeok (세종대학교 대학원)
Publication Information
Transactions of the Korean Society of Pressure Vessels and Piping / v.14, no.2, 2018 , pp. 69-76 More about this Journal
Abstract
The paper presents preliminary investigation results for the effect of the baseline correction in the acceleration excitation method on finite element seismic analysis results (such as accumulated equivalent plastic strain, equivalent plastic strain considering cyclic plasticity, von Mises effective stress, etc) of nuclear safety Class I components. For investigation, finite element elastic-plastic time-history seismic analysis is performed for a surge line including a pressurizer lower head, a pressurizer surge nozzle, a surge piping, and a hot leg surge nozzle using the Chaboche hardening model. Analysis is performed for various seismic loading methods such as acceleration excitation methods with and without the baseline correction, and a displacement excitation method. Comparing finite element analysis results, the effect of the baseline correction is investigated. As a result of the investigation, it is identified that finite element analysis results using the three methods do not show significant difference.
Keywords
Finite Element Elastic-Plastic Seismic Analysis; Dynamic Time-History Analysis; Seismic Loading Method; Nuclear Power Plant; Safety Class I Component; Baseline Correction;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 2  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 USNRC, 2011, Recommendations for Enhancing Reactor Safety in the 21st Century: The Near Term Task Force Review of Insights from the Fukushima Dai-Ichi Accident.
2 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2016_Kumamoto_earthquakes.
3 ASME B&PV Code Committee, 2007, ASME B&PV Code, Sec.III, Div.1, Subsec.NB, Article NB-3656.
4 ASME B&PV Code Committee, 2007, ASME B&PV Code, Sec.III, Div.1, Appendices, App.F.
5 http://www.todayenergy.kr/news/articleView.html?idxno=119948
6 이대영, 박흥배, 김진원, 류호완, 김윤재, 2016, 설계 기준초과지진 하의 원전 배관 구조 건전성 평가를 위한 변형률 기반 방법 검토, 한국압력기기공학회논문집, Vol.12, No.2, pp.66-70.
7 최인길, 2017, 설계초과지지에 대한 원전 지진안전성평가 기술 고찰 및 제언, 한국압력기기공학회 논문집, Vol.13, No.1, pp.1-15   DOI
8 김종성, 이석현, 권형도, 오창영, 2017, 동적 시간이력 탄소성 지진해석을 위한 레일레이 감쇠계수 결정 방법 고찰, 한국압력기기공학회 논문집, Vol.13, No.2, pp.38-43.   DOI
9 KAERI, 2008, An Application of the Baseline Correction Technique for Correcting Distorted Seismic Acceleration Time Histories, KAERI/TR-3553/2008.
10 Dassault Systems, 2017, User's Manuals for Simulia, Ver.6.17.
11 KHNP, 2018, APR1400 Design Control Document and Environmental Report.
12 J.L. Chaboche, 1986, Time-independent constitutive theories for cyclic plasticity, International Journal of Plasticity, Vol.2, pp. 149-188.   DOI
13 https://www.ytn.co.kr/_ln/0103_201609122130433861