디지털융복합연구 (Journal of Digital Convergence)

  • 제16권2호
  • /
  • Pages.83-91
  • /
  • 2018
  • /
  • 2713-6434(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2713-6442(eISSN)
한국디지털정책학회 (The Society of Digital Policy and Management)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

교사의 감성적 리더십의 실제와 정책적 시사점

Teacher's Emotional Leadership Practices and Policy Implication

  • 박승 (제주대학교 교육대학원) ;
  • 이인회 (제주대학교 교육학과)
  • Piao, Sheng (Graduate School of Education, Jeju National University) ;
  • Lee, In-Hoi (Dept. of Education, Graduate School of Education, Jeju National University)
  • 투고 : 2018.01.02
  • 심사 : 2018.02.20
  • 발행 : 2018.02.28
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

이 연구의 목적은 담임교사의 감성적 리더십이 학생의 자기주도적 학습과 학교생활만족도에 미치는 영향을 분석하여 교육정책적 시사점을 도출하는데 있었다. 이러한 연구 목적을 달성하기 위해 연변지역 3개 고등학교 605명의 학생을 대상으로 설문조사를 실시하였다. 주요한 연구결과는 다음과 같다. 첫째, 담임교사의 감성적 리더십은 학생의 자기주도적 학습에 영향을 주는 중요한 변수가 된다. 둘째, 담임교사의 감성적 리더십 가운데 사회적 요인보다 개인요인인 자기인식능력과 자기관리능력이 학생의 학교생활만족도에 더 많은 영향을 미치고 있다. 셋째, 담임교사는 먼저 학생들의 학교생활만족도에 초점을 두어야 하고 학교생활만족도를 향상시킴으로써 학생의 자기주도적 학습을 제고시켜야 한다. 향후연구에서는 교사의 감성적 리더십이 영향을 주는 다양한 변인들을 포함하여 정책적 시사점을 모색할 필요가 있다.

The purpose of this study was to examine teacher's emotional leadership practices and to suggest their educational policy implication. To do so, a survey was conducted on Chinese-Korean students in Yanbian area. Data samples were 605 students at three high schools. The major results are summarized as follows: First, the teacher's emotional leadership is an important variable to improve student's self-directed learning. Second, it is suggestive that the teacher should focus on developing students personal competences such as self awareness and self management rather than social competences. Lastly, the teacher should focus on and improve satisfaction of student's school life first, and try to increase student's self-directed learning. However, various variables that may influence teacher's emotional leadership should be included in the further study.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. I. H. Lee. (2015). An analysis and the improvement of Jeju Self-Governing School policy. Journal of Digital Convergence, 13(2), 23-34. https://doi.org/10.14400/JDC.2015.13.2.23
  2. Education Department of Chinese Yanbian Area. (2011). Educational Statistics. Yanbian, China: Education Department of Chinese Yanbian Area.
  3. I. H. Lee & M. S. Kim. (2013). A comparison of the structural relationships among problem behavior variables between ethnic Korean and Chinese children groups from deficient families. Korean Journal of Comparative Education, 23(4), 197-222.
  4. I. H. Lee. (2016). An analysis of school change of A middle school according to the free semester policy. Journal of Digital Convergence, 14(1), 33-42. https://doi.org/10.14400/JDC.2016.14.1.33
  5. W. S. Jeong. (1976). Education of Intelligence and Justice. Seoul: Baeyoung Publisher.
  6. P. Salovey & J. D. Mayer. (1990). Emotional Intelligence, Imagination, Cognition & Personality. New York: Basic Books.
  7. C. S. Jang & J. O. Park. (2012). The moderating effects of emotional intelligence in the relations between transformational leadership and organizational commitment. Journal of Digital Convergence, 10(11), 209-223. https://doi.org/10.14400/JDPM.2012.10.11.209
  8. Y. N. Kim & B. H. Ahn. (2011). The relationship between emotional leadership of the teacher and student's satisfaction of teacher's instruction. Journal of Educational Research & Implementation, 10(3), 113-135.
  9. P. Y. Lee. (2014). Analysis of the relationships between middle school students' perceptions on home-room teacher's emotional leadership and school life. Master's thesis, Keyongsan University.
  10. C. O. Houle. (1961). The Importance of Adult Education, In Study-Discussion Group Techniques for Parent Education Leaders. Chicago: National Congress of Parent and Teacher.
  11. T. Tough. (1971). The Adult's Learning Project. Toronto, Ontario: The Ontario Institute for Studies in Education.
  12. M. S. Knowles. (1975). Self-directed Learning: A Guide for Learners and Teachers. Chicago: Follett Publishing Co.
  13. G. A. Straka. (2000). Conception of Self-direction Learning: Theoretical and Conceptual Consideration. New York: Waxmann.
  14. H. J. Kim & J. H. Jung. (2011). Relations among teaching Factors, student's interest, enjoyment, intrinsic motivation, student learning. Korean Journal of Educational Psychology, 25(3), 569-589.
  15. E. S. Huebener., S. M. Suldo., R. F. Valois., J. W. Drane & K. Zullig. (2004). Brief multidimensional students' life satisfaction scale: Gender, grade, and race effects. Psychol Rep, 94, 351-356. https://doi.org/10.2466/pr0.94.1.351-356
  16. J. Wilson. (1989). Bureaucracy: What Government Agencies Do and Why They Do It. New York: Basic Books.
  17. M. Kwak & Y. Kim. (2013). A study of influence on adolescent psychological well-being: Focusing on strengths of family life and satisfaction with school life in the IT-based society. Journal of Digital Convergence, 11(3), 49-57. https://doi.org/10.14400/JDPM.2013.11.12.49