디지털융복합연구 (Journal of Digital Convergence)

  • 제16권2호
  • /
  • Pages.93-102
  • /
  • 2018
  • /
  • 2713-6434(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2713-6442(eISSN)
한국디지털정책학회 (The Society of Digital Policy and Management)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

외부지식탐색이 혁신속도에 미치는 영향: 수출성과의 조절효과를 중심으로

The Effect of External Knowledge Search on Innovation Speed: Focusing on the Moderation Effect of Export Performance

  • 노태우 (순천향대학교 국제통상학과)
  • Roh, Taewoo (Department of International Trade and Commerce, Soonchunhyang University)
  • 투고 : 2017.10.11
  • 심사 : 2018.02.20
  • 발행 : 2018.02.28
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

본 연구는 기업이 지식을 창출하고 혁신에 이르기 위해 노력하는 방안으로써 외부지식탐색을 제시하고 외부지식탐색의 폭과 깊이를 중심으로 혁신속도와의 관계를 살펴보았다. 국내시장에서 기업이 외부지식탐색이 가지는 루틴의 한계를 극복하기 위한 노력의 일환으로 해외시장으로 진출하고자 하는 노력을 조절효과로 살펴보았다. 기존연구에서는 외부지식탐색이 대부분 단일국가 혹은 유사 산업 간에서 나타나는 여러 가지 효과를 살펴보았다면, 본 연구는 이를 조금 더 확장하여 시장확대 개념을 도입해 그 상호작용을 실증한 것이다. 본 연구에서 사용된 818개의 유효 표본은 STEPI에서 발간하는 혁신조사를 기반으로 하였으며, 실증결과는 다음과 같다. 첫째, 외부지식탐색의 폭과 깊이는 혁신속도에 긍정적인 영향을 미친다. 둘째, 시장확대효과로써 수출성과는 외부지식탐색의 폭 및 깊이와 함께 상호작용하여 혁신속도에 조절효과를 가진다. 셋째, 젊은 기업일수록 다양한 네트워크를 선호하면서 수출증대효과와 상호작용하며 나이가 많은 기업일수록 심도있는 네트워크를 선호하면서 수출증대와 상호작용하여 혁신속도를 증가시킨다.

This study suggests external knowledge search as a way of creating knowledge and efforts for reaching out to the innovation and examines the relationship between innovation speed and the breadth and depth of external knowledge search. As a part of efforts to overcome the limitations of the routines of external knowledge search in the domestic market, the efforts of a firm to enter the foreign market have been examined with a moderate effect. Although previous research focused on exploration of external knowledge that is mostly effected in single country or similar industry, this study expands it by introducing the concept of market expansion and empirically inspect the interaction effect. 818 valid samples used in this study are based on the innovation survey published by STEPI and empirical results are as follows. First, the breadth and depth of external knowledge search have a positive impact on innovation speed. Second, export performance as the effect of expanding the market has a moderating effect on the speed of innovation. Third, younger companies prefer various networks while older companies prefer depth networks in order to increase the speed.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. H. Chesbrough. (2003). Open Innovation: The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology. MA: Harvard Business Press.
  2. B. Cassiman & E. Golovko. (2011). Innovation and Internationalization through Exports, Journal of International Business Studies, 42(1), 56-75. https://doi.org/10.1057/jibs.2010.36
  3. H. Hoang & F. T. Rothaermel. (2010). Leveraging Internal and External Experience: Exploration, Exploitation, and R&D Project Performance, Strategic Management Journal, 31(7), 734-758. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.834
  4. H. Bahemia & B. Squire. (2010). A Contingent Perspective of Open Innovation in New Product Development Projects, International Journal of Innovation Management, 14(4), 603-603. https://doi.org/10.1142/S1363919610002799
  5. F. T. Rothaermel & D. L. Deeds. (2006). Alliance Type, Alliance Experience and Alliance Management Capability in High-Technology Ventures, Journal of Business Venturing, 21(4), 429-460. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2005.02.006
  6. L. Miotti & F. Sachwald. (2003). Co-Operative R&D: Why and with Whom? An Integrated Framework of Analysis, Research Policy, 32(8), 1481-1499. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(02)00159-2
  7. M. J. Nieto, L. Santamaria, & Z. Fernandez. (2015). Understanding the Innovation Behavior of Family Firms, Journal of Small Business Management, 53(2), 382-399. https://doi.org/10.1111/jsbm.12075
  8. K. Laursen & A. Salter. (2004). Searching High and Low: What Types of Firms Use Universities as a Source of Innovation?, Research Policy, 33(8), 1201-1215. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2004.07.004
  9. J. Y. Yang & T. W. Roh. (2015). External Open Innovation Strategy and Innovation Outcome in Smes, Knowledge Management Research, 16(4), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.15813/kmr.2015.16.4.001
  10. J. Y. Jung, T. W. Roh, & Y. J. Han. (2014). External Knowledgesearch Strategy and Technological Innovation: Small Vs Medium Firms, Asia-Pacific Journal of Business Venturing and Entrepreneurship, 9(5), 173-180.
  11. J. Y. Jung, T. W. Roh, & Y. J. Han. (2015). Effects of the External Knowledge Search and Utilization Activities of Smes on Market Expansion, Knowledge Management Research, 16(1), 243-254. https://doi.org/10.15813/kmr.2015.16.1.012
  12. W. M. Cohen & D. A. Levinthal. (1990). Absorptive Capacity: A New Perspective on Learning and Innovation, Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(1), 128-152. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393553
  13. J. West & M. Bogers. (2014). Leveraging External Sources of Innovation: A Review of Research on Open Innovation, Journal of Product Innovation Management, 31(4), 814-831. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpim.12125
  14. L. Dahl&er & M. Magnusson. (2008). How Do Firms Make Use of Open Source Communities?, Long Range Planning, 41(6), 629-649. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2008.09.003
  15. V. van de Vrande, J. P. J. de Jong, W. Vanhaverbeke, and M. de Rochemont. (2009). Open Innovation in Smes: Trends, Motives and Management Challenges, Technovation, 29(6-7), 423-437. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2008.10.001
  16. J. E. Hwang & T. W. Roh. (2015). The Effect of External Search on Innovation Performance and Speed, The Journal of Small Business Innovation, 18(4), 15-31.
  17. H. Chesbrough, W. Vanhaverbeke, & J. West. (2006). Open Innovation: Researching a New Paradigm. UK: OUP Oxford.
  18. V. Parida, M. Westerberg, & J. Frishammar. (2012). Innovation Performance, Journal of Small Business Management, 50(2), 283-309. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-627X.2012.00354.x
  19. U. Lichtenthaler. (2009). Absorptive Capacity, Environmental Turbulence, and the Complementarity of Organizational Learning Processes, Academy of Management Journal, 52(4), 822-846. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMJ.2009.43670902
  20. E. Enkel & O. Gassmann. (2010). Creative Imitation: Exploring the Case of Cross-Industry Innovation, R&D Management, 40(3), 256-270. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9310.2010.00591.x
  21. R. Katila & G. Ahuja. (2002). Something Old, Something New: A Longitudinal Study of Search Behavior and New Product Introduction, Academy of Management Journal, 45(6), 1183-1194. https://doi.org/10.2307/3069433
  22. K. Laursen & A. Salter. (2006). Open for Innovation: The Role of Openness in Explaining Innovation Performance among Uk Manufacturing Firms, Strategic Management Journal, 27(2), 131-150. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.507
  23. N. Y. Sakkab. (2002). Connect & Develop Complements Research & Develop at P&G, Research Technology Management, 45(2), 38-45. https://doi.org/10.1080/08956308.2002.11671490
  24. M. Dodgson, D. Gann, & A. Salter. (2006). The Role of Technology in the Shift Towards Open Innovation: The Case of Procter & Gamble, R&D Management, 36(3), 333-346. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9310.2006.00429.x
  25. A. Banu Goktan & G. Miles. (2011). Innovation Speed and Radicalness: Are They Inversely Related?, Management Decision, 49(4), 533-547. https://doi.org/10.1108/00251741111126477
  26. M. Subramaniam & M. A. Youndt. (2005). The Influence of Intellectual Capital on the Types of Innovative Capabilities, Academy of Management Journal, 48(3), 450-463. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMJ.2005.17407911
  27. H. Gatignon, M. L. Tushman, W. Smith, & P. Anderson. (2002). A Structural Approach to Assessing Innovation: Construct Development of Innovation Locus, Type, and Characteristics, Management Science, 48(9), 1103-1122. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.48.9.1103.174
  28. D. J. Miller, M. J. Fern, & L. B. Cardinal. (2007). The Use of Knowledge for Technological Innovation within Diversified Firms, Academy of Management Journal, 50(2), 307-325. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMJ.2007.24634437
  29. A. Taylor & H. R. Greve. (2006). Superman or the Fantastic Four? Knowledge Combination and Experience in Innovative Teams, Academy of Management Journal, 49(4), 723-740. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMJ.2006.22083029
  30. S. A. Zahra & G. George. (2002). Absorptive Capacity: A Review, Reconceptualization, and Extension, Academy of Management Review, 27(2), 185-203. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2002.6587995
  31. R. M. Henderson & K. B. Clark. (1990). Architectural Innovation: The Reconfiguration of Existing Product Technologies and the Failure of Established Firms, Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(1), 9-9. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393549
  32. T. W. Roh & K. C. Kim. (2015). R&D Capabilities, Market Resilience, and Performance in Korean SMEs, The Journal of Small Business Innovation, 18(2), 1-14.
  33. D. J. Kim, K. C. Kim, & T. Roh. (2014). Innovation Trap of SMEs: Liability of Smallness, Learning and Export, The Journal of Small Business Innovation, 17(4), 49-65.
  34. E. Golovko & G. Valentini. (2011). Exploring the Complementarity between Innovation and Export for Smes' Growth, Journal of International Business Studies, 42(3), 362-380. https://doi.org/10.1057/jibs.2011.2
  35. J. Hair, W. Black, B. Babin, R. Anderson, & R. Tatham. (1998). Multivariate Data Analysis. NJ: Prentice Hall.
  36. W. J. Lee & W. K. Lim. (2017). Effects of Entrepreneurial Orientation and Firm's Resources on Technological Innovation Performance and Ambidextrous Innovation; with Meditation Effects of Dynamic Capabilities, Journal of Digital Convergence, 15(10), 133-150. https://doi.org/10.14400/JDC.2017.15.10.133
  37. D. S. Jung. (2017), An Empirical Study on the Influence of Technology Management Activities on Firm Performance, Journal of Digital Convergence, 15(10), 201-201. https://doi.org/10.14400/JDC.2017.15.3.201
  38. M. S. Yim. (2016). The Convergence between Manufacturing and ICT : The Exploring Strategies for Manufacturing version 3.0 in Korea, Journal of Digital Convergence, 14(3), 219-226. https://doi.org/10.14400/JDC.2016.14.3.219
  39. C. W. Jahng & T. H. Kwon. (2015). Research on Strategies of Open Innovation Activities with Impacts on Dynamic Competitive Advantage : In the Context of Digital Convergence and Disruptive Innovation, Journal of Digital Convergence, 13(5), 119-127. https://doi.org/10.14400/JDC.2015.13.5.119
  40. Y. J. Park. (2015). The Design of Conceptual Framework and Platform for Collaborative Innovation and Convergence, Journal of Digital Convergence, 13(5), 101-109. https://doi.org/10.14400/JDC.2015.13.5.101
  41. T. S. Jeong. (2015). A Study on the Relationship between Customer and Supplier Network and Innovation Performance : Focused on Mediating Effect of T-Shaped Skill, Journal of Digital Convergence, 13(1), 93-110. https://doi.org/10.14400/JDC.2015.13.1.93
  42. S. T. Park & Y. K. Kim. (2014). Difference Across Indutries of Innovation Appropriability Mechanism's Effectiveness and Classification, Journal of Digital Convergence, 12(6), 135-144. https://doi.org/10.14400/JDC.2014.12.6.135
  43. Y. Kim. (2014). A Study on plan for promoting innovation and utilization of information sharing, Journal of Digital Convergence, 12(4), 43-49. https://doi.org/10.14400/JDC.2014.12.4.43
  44. H. C. Kim & S. K. Lee. (2014). An Empirical Study on the Critical Success Factor of Technological Innovation of Small-Medium Sized enterprises by growth stages - Focusing on the Case Study, Journal of Digital Convergence, 12(10), 1-20. https://doi.org/10.14400/JDC.2014.12.10.1