Journal of Convergence for Information Technology (융합정보논문지)

Convergence Society for SMB (중소기업융합학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The influence of interpersonal relation of people with disability on daily life satisfaction; focusing on mediating effect of self-efficacy.

장애인의 대인관계가 일상생활 만족도에 미치는 영향; 자기효능감의 매개효과 중심으로

  • 권오형 (한세대학교 사회복지학과) ;
  • 문재우 (한세대학교 사회복지학과)
  • Received : 2018.10.16
  • Accepted : 2018.12.20
  • Published : 2018.12.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

This study is to find ways to improve the daily life satisfaction of people with disability through interpersonal relation and self-efficacy. Descriptive statistics, correlation analysis and regression analysis by SPSS 21.0 were applied to 1,483 out of 4,400 of Penal Survey of Employment for the Disabled 2nd Wave. The study show that the interpersonal relation had a positive effect on self-efficacy and daily life satisfaction. Self-efficacy influenced positive effect to life satisfaction and played a mediating role between interpersonal relation and daily life satisfaction. Based on the conclusion that daily life satisfaction can be enhanced through the improvement of interpersonal relations and self-efficacy, this study made policy suggestions to improve interpersonal relations and self-efficacy.

연구의 목적은 대인관계 및 자기효능감을 통하여 장애인의 일상생활 만족도 향상 방안을 모색하는 것이다. 본 연구에는 2017년 장애인고용패널 2차 웨이브 2차 조사 대상자 4,400명중 1,483명을 대상으로 SPSS 21.0에 의한 기술통계, 상관분석 및 회귀분석이 활용되었다. 연구결과 대인관계는 자기효능감과 일상 생활만족도에 정(+)의 영향을 미쳤다. 자기효능감은 일상생활만족도에 정의 영향을 미쳤으며, 대인관계와 일상생활 만족도 간에 매개역할을 했다. 원활한 대인관계 및 자기효능감 증진을 통하여 일상생활 만족도를 높일 수 있다는 결론을 바탕으로 대인관계 및 자기효능감 증대를 위한 정책적 제언을 하였다.

Keywords

Table 1. Sociodemographic Characteristics by Group

JKOHBZ_2018_v8n6_327_t0001.png 이미지

Table 2. Characteristics of Major Variables

JKOHBZ_2018_v8n6_327_t0002.png 이미지

Table 3. Correlation

JKOHBZ_2018_v8n6_327_t0003.png 이미지

Table 4. Mediation effect of self-efficacy

JKOHBZ_2018_v8n6_327_t0004.png 이미지

Table 5. Sobel test

JKOHBZ_2018_v8n6_327_t0005.png 이미지

References

  1. O. H. Cwon. (2015). The Influence of Disabled Paid Workers Subjective Socioeconomic Statues on Daily Life Satisfaction ; the Main Focus on Analyzing Mediation Effect of Self Esteem and Moderating Effect of Standard and Non-standard Workers. Disability & Employment, 25(4), 297-319. https://doi.org/10.15707/disem.2015.25.4.012
  2. Diener, Ed, E. Sandvik, L. Seidlitz & M. Diener. (1993). The relationship between incom and subjective well-bing; relative or absolute?, Social Indicators Research, 28, 195-223. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01079018
  3. S. H. Kim. (2018). Gross domestic product 2017. http://www.yonhapnews.co.kr/bulletin/2018/08/14/0200000000AKR20180814148100002.HTML
  4. OECD (2017). World Happiness Report 2017. OECD. http://www.oecdbetterlifeindex.org/topics/life-satisfaction/
  5. H. Joon. (2015). Quality of Life in Korea and Its Social Determinants. Journal of Governance studies, 10(2), 67-95.
  6. R. Montemayor. (1994). The study of personal relationships during adolescent, in persional relationship during adolescent, edited by R. Montemayor, G. Adam & T. Gulotta, CA; Sage.
  7. S. J. Lee. (2008). The Relationship of Social Connectedness with Self-Efficacy and Subjective Well-Being: The Mediating Effect of Interpersonal Problem. Educational Research Institute Kookmin University Seoul Korea, 27(1), 67-87
  8. H. S. Kang & K. H. Lim. (2013). The Influences of Appearance Satisfaction and Interpersonal Relationship on Self-Efficacy of High School Students in Jeollanam-do. Korean Journal of Counseling. 14(1), 481-500. https://doi.org/10.15703/kjc.14.1.201302.481
  9. D. M. Yeum, M. J. Kim & H. Y. Baek. (2013). Focused on the mediating effects of job satisfaction, the impact of the social networks of workers with disabilities on life satisfaction. Disability & Employment, 23(1), 303-325. https://doi.org/10.15707/disem.2013.23.1.012
  10. C. S. Lee & M. S. Kim. (2012). The study on the psychosocial variabes influencing job satisfaction of the working people with disabilities. Disability & Employment, 22(1), 29-54. https://doi.org/10.15707/disem.2012.22.1.002
  11. A. Bandura. (1997). Self-efficacy; The exercise of central. New York; Freeman.
  12. W. G. Jang, Y. S. Park & U. C. Kim. (2007). Human relationship, self-efficacy and quality of life among university students: Indigenous and cultural psychological analysis. The Research Institute of Korean Education, 25(1), 1-21.
  13. H. Y. Lee. (2014). A Study on the Relation between the Conflict.Interpersonal Relation, Self-efficacy and Life Satisfaction of Parents-in-Law Living Together with Daughter-in-Law. The Society of Korean Thought And Culture, 75, 457-484.
  14. H. S. Kim & Y. S. Lee. (2014). Effects of Household Income and Employment Status on Leisure Activities and Life Satisfaction among the Disabled. Disability & Employment, 24(4), 146-171. https://doi.org/10.15707/disem.2014.24.4.007
  15. M. S. Jeon. (2018). Study on Factors Influencing the Disabled's Quality of Life: Focusing on Comparison between Employed and Unemployed Disabled People. The Korea Contents Association, 18(1), 201-221.
  16. H. E. Nam. (2015). A study on the People with Physical Disabilities' Awareness of Social Discrimination on Quality of Life - Centering on the mediating effect of stress-coping resources and stress-coping methods -. Korea Academy of Disability and Welfare, 30, 117-143.
  17. J. S. Lee. (2011). The effect of experienced discrimination and self stigma on life satisfaction of people with disabilities. Social Science Research Review, 27(1), 277-299.
  18. H. K. Kim. (2010). The Impact of Social Support and Prejudice Experienced by the Mentally Ill on Quality of their Life. Journal of Institute for Social Sciences, 21(2), 63-84.
  19. I. G. Jeong. (2015). The Effects of Social Support on the Quality of Life in People with Cerebral Palsy -Focusing on the Mediating Effect of Self‐esteem. Rehabilitation International Korea, 19(4), 61-81.
  20. J. O. Sin. (2015). Multiple Mediator of Job Environment and Work Sustainability on the relation of Job Satisfaction and Life Satisfaction. Journal of Critical Social Policy, 49, 202-226.
  21. N. H. Park & M. S. Gu. (2016). The impacts of activities of daily living and living environment on the quality of life of people with disabilities. Korean Journal of Social Science, 19, 79-115.
  22. H. S. Kim & Y. S. Kim. (2009). The Effect of Depression on the Quality of Life in Elderly with Disability. Institute of Humanities and Social Science, 22, 183-215.
  23. S. H. Kim, J. K. Park & E. R. Kim. (2016). Relationship between the Social Participation and the Subjective Quality of Life of the Individuals with Physical Disabilities. Disability & Employment, 26(4), 173-195.
  24. S. G. Song & H. Lee. (2014). The Leisure Participations and Leisure Satisfaction of People with Disabilities : Focused on Objective Frequency and Perceived Frequency. Tourism & Leisure Research, 26(6), 261-280.
  25. J. J. J. Lee. (2017). Penel Survey of Employment for the Disabled 2nd Wave. Disability & Employment.
  26. S. Schlein & B. G. Guerney. (1971). Relationship Enhancement. San Francisco, CA; Jossey-Bass.
  27. M. Jerusalem & R. Schwarzer. (1992). Self-efficacy as a resource factor in stress appraisal processes. In R. Schwarzer (Ed.), Self-efficacy: Thought control of action(pp. 195-213). Washington, D.C.: Hemisphere Publishing Corporation.
  28. R. M. Baron & D. A. Kenny. (1986), The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research; conceptual, strategic and statitical considerations, Journal of Personality and Social Psych, 15(6), 1173-1182.
  29. D. P. Mackinnon, C. M. Lockwood, J. M. Hofman, S. west & V. Sheets. (2002). A comparison of methods to test mediation and other intervening variable effects. Psychological Methodes, 7, 83-104. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.7.1.83
  30. E. S. Kwak. (2003). The influances of leisure activitied and peer -relationship on adolescets' life satisfaction. Daejeon University, Daejeon.
  31. U. G. Jang, Y. S. Park & U. C. Kim. (2008). The influence of social support and self-efficacy on quality of Life among Korean adults. Korean Psychological Association, 1, 22-33.