References
- Abell, S. K. (2007). Research on science teacher knowledge. In S. K. Abell & N. G. Lederman (eds.), Research on Science Teacher Education (pp. 1105-1149). New York: Routledge.
- Archer, L., DeWitt, J., Osborne, J., Dillon, J., Willis, B., & Wong, B. (2010). 'Doing' science vs 'being' a scientist. Science Education, 94(4), 617-639. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20399
- Barton, A. C., & Tan, E. (2009). Creating hybrid spaces for engaging school science among urban middle school girls. American Educational Research Journal, 45(1), 68-103. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831207308641
- Barton, A. C., Tan, E., & Rivet, A. (2008). Creating hybrid spaces for engaging school science among urban middle school girls. American Educational Research Journal, 45(1), 68-103. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831207308641
- Basu, S. J. (2008). How students design and enact physics lessons: Five immigrant caribbean youth and the cultivation of student voice. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 45(8), 881-899. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20257
- Cornelius, L. L., & Herrenkohl, L, R. (2004). Power in the classroom: How the classroom environment shapes students' relationship with each other and with concepts. Cognition and Instruction, 22(4), 467-496. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532690Xci2204_4
- Crawford, B., Krajcik, J., & Marx, R. (1999). Elements of a community of learners in a middle-school science classroom. Science Education, 83, 701-723. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-237X(199911)83:6<701::AID-SCE4>3.0.CO;2-2
- Damsa, C. I., Kirschner, P. A., Andriessen, J. E. B., Erkens, G., & Sins, P. H. M. (2010). Shared epistemic agency: An empirical study of an emergent construct. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 19(2), 143-186. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508401003708381
- Donnelly, D. F., McGarr, O., & O'Reilly, J. (2014). "Just be quiet and listen to exactly what he's saying": Conceptualising power relations in inquiry-oriented classrooms. International Journal of Science Education, 36(12), 2029-2054. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2014.889867
- Driver, R., Newton, P., & Osborne, J. (2000). Establishing the norms of scientific argumentation in classrooms. Science Education, 84(3), 287-312. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-237X(200005)84:3<287::AID-SCE1>3.0.CO;2-A
- Ford, M. (2008). Disciplinary authority and accountability in scientific practice and learning. Science Education, 92, 404-423. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20263
- Foucault, M. (1982). The subject and power. Critical Inquiry, 8(4), 777-795. https://doi.org/10.1086/448181
- Gonzalez, Molls & Amanti, (2005). Funds of knowledge: Theorizing practices in households, communities, and classrooms. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
- Jeon, M-J., Kim, H-T., & Kim, J. G. (2012). The characteristic of elementary school students' interest in life and the relationship with their experience about nature. Biology Education, 40(1), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.15717/bioedu.2012.40.1.1
- Kim, H., Kang, E., & Kim, H-B. (2015). Expression of students' agency in an elementary school science class : A focus on teaching and learning contexts. The Korean Journal of Biology Education, 43(3), 289-301.
- Knorr-Cetina, K. (1999). Epistemic cultures: How the sciences make knowledge. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
- Latour, B. (1999). Give me a laboratory and I will raise the world. In M. Biagioli (ed.), The science studies reader (pp. 258-75). New York: Routledge.
- Ma, S. J.(2004). Attitudes toward pet animals of elementary school students and their relationships with pet ownership and chil-pet interaction. Journal of Korean Practional Arts Education, 17(3), 219-232.
- Ministry of Education (2016). 2015 revised science curriculum. Ministry of Education.
- Moll, L. C., Amanti, C., Neff, D., & Gonzalez, N. (1992). Funds of knowledge for teaching: Using a qualitative approach to connect homes and classrooms. Theory Into Practice, 31(2), 132-141. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405849209543534
- Moreno-Lopez, I. (2005). Sharing power with students: The critical language classroom. Radical Pedagogy, 7(2).
- National Research Council (2012). A framework for K-12 Science Education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. Washington DC: The National Academies Press.
- Osborne, J. F., & Collins, S. (2001). Pupils' views of the role and value of the science curriculum: A focus-group study. International Journal of Science Education, 23(5), 441-467. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690010006518
- Patchen, T., & Smithenry, D. W. (2014). Diversifying instruction and shifting authority: a cultural historical activity theory(CHAT) analysis of classroom participant structures. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 51(5), 606-634. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21140
- Rodrigues, M. G. (2013). Power and agency in education: exploring the pedagogical dimensions of funds of knowledge. Review of Research in Education, 37, 87-120. https://doi.org/10.3102/0091732X12462686
- Roth, W.-M., & Lee, Y.-J. (2007). "Vygotsky's neglected legacy": Cultural-historical activity theory. Review of Educational Research, 77(2), 186-232. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654306298273
- Strauss, A. L., & Corbin, J. M. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. London: Sage.
- Stroupe, D. (2014). Examining classroom science practice communities: How teachers and students negotiate epistemic agency and learn science-as-practice. Science Education, 98, 487-516. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21112
- Upadhyay, B. R. (2006). Using student's lived experience in an urban science classroom: An elementary school teacher's thinking. Science Education, 90, 94-110. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20095