Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2017.37.4.587

Elementary Students' Perceptions of Role and Epistemic Authority in the Activity about 'Making a Pet Poster'  

Kang, Eunhee (Seoul National University)
Kim, Heui-Baik (Seoul National University)
Publication Information
Journal of The Korean Association For Science Education / v.37, no.4, 2017 , pp. 587-597 More about this Journal
Abstract
If we, as educators, want to put students at the center of learning in science classroom, we must let students express their voices and exercise authority. To do this, we developed a classroom activity about 'Making a pet poster', and then we explored how elementary school students perceived their roles and expressed their authority during this activity. Fourth grade students from an elementary school in the city of Seoul participated in the activity, which was videotaped and recorded. We found that students expressed their epistemic authority differently in small group activities and in whole group discussions. In small group activities, they desired to show their authority as "pet experts" by using and selecting various resources from their everyday lives and transforming those resources into suitable forms in public spaces. Meanwhile, in whole group discussions, participants were classified as either presenters or audience members to verify their authority in regard to the pet poster activity; presenters desired to achieve recognition as "pet experts," and audience members assessed the presenters as "testers." In addition, they expressed authority as teachers by leading the whole group discussions. Based on these findings, this paper suggests the implications for new educational strategies to foster a student-centered learning environment.
Keywords
science education; teaching; Epistemic authority; small group activity; whole group discussion; pet poster;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Crawford, B., Krajcik, J., & Marx, R. (1999). Elements of a community of learners in a middle-school science classroom. Science Education, 83, 701-723.   DOI
2 Damsa, C. I., Kirschner, P. A., Andriessen, J. E. B., Erkens, G., & Sins, P. H. M. (2010). Shared epistemic agency: An empirical study of an emergent construct. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 19(2), 143-186.   DOI
3 Donnelly, D. F., McGarr, O., & O'Reilly, J. (2014). "Just be quiet and listen to exactly what he's saying": Conceptualising power relations in inquiry-oriented classrooms. International Journal of Science Education, 36(12), 2029-2054.   DOI
4 Driver, R., Newton, P., & Osborne, J. (2000). Establishing the norms of scientific argumentation in classrooms. Science Education, 84(3), 287-312.   DOI
5 Ford, M. (2008). Disciplinary authority and accountability in scientific practice and learning. Science Education, 92, 404-423.   DOI
6 Foucault, M. (1982). The subject and power. Critical Inquiry, 8(4), 777-795.   DOI
7 Gonzalez, Molls & Amanti, (2005). Funds of knowledge: Theorizing practices in households, communities, and classrooms. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
8 Jeon, M-J., Kim, H-T., & Kim, J. G. (2012). The characteristic of elementary school students' interest in life and the relationship with their experience about nature. Biology Education, 40(1), 1-14.   DOI
9 Kim, H., Kang, E., & Kim, H-B. (2015). Expression of students' agency in an elementary school science class : A focus on teaching and learning contexts. The Korean Journal of Biology Education, 43(3), 289-301.
10 Knorr-Cetina, K. (1999). Epistemic cultures: How the sciences make knowledge. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
11 Moll, L. C., Amanti, C., Neff, D., & Gonzalez, N. (1992). Funds of knowledge for teaching: Using a qualitative approach to connect homes and classrooms. Theory Into Practice, 31(2), 132-141.   DOI
12 Latour, B. (1999). Give me a laboratory and I will raise the world. In M. Biagioli (ed.), The science studies reader (pp. 258-75). New York: Routledge.
13 Ma, S. J.(2004). Attitudes toward pet animals of elementary school students and their relationships with pet ownership and chil-pet interaction. Journal of Korean Practional Arts Education, 17(3), 219-232.
14 Ministry of Education (2016). 2015 revised science curriculum. Ministry of Education.
15 Moreno-Lopez, I. (2005). Sharing power with students: The critical language classroom. Radical Pedagogy, 7(2).
16 National Research Council (2012). A framework for K-12 Science Education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. Washington DC: The National Academies Press.
17 Barton, A. C., & Tan, E. (2009). Creating hybrid spaces for engaging school science among urban middle school girls. American Educational Research Journal, 45(1), 68-103.   DOI
18 Strauss, A. L., & Corbin, J. M. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. London: Sage.
19 Stroupe, D. (2014). Examining classroom science practice communities: How teachers and students negotiate epistemic agency and learn science-as-practice. Science Education, 98, 487-516.   DOI
20 Upadhyay, B. R. (2006). Using student's lived experience in an urban science classroom: An elementary school teacher's thinking. Science Education, 90, 94-110.   DOI
21 Barton, A. C., Tan, E., & Rivet, A. (2008). Creating hybrid spaces for engaging school science among urban middle school girls. American Educational Research Journal, 45(1), 68-103.   DOI
22 Abell, S. K. (2007). Research on science teacher knowledge. In S. K. Abell & N. G. Lederman (eds.), Research on Science Teacher Education (pp. 1105-1149). New York: Routledge.
23 Archer, L., DeWitt, J., Osborne, J., Dillon, J., Willis, B., & Wong, B. (2010). 'Doing' science vs 'being' a scientist. Science Education, 94(4), 617-639.   DOI
24 Basu, S. J. (2008). How students design and enact physics lessons: Five immigrant caribbean youth and the cultivation of student voice. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 45(8), 881-899.   DOI
25 Roth, W.-M., & Lee, Y.-J. (2007). "Vygotsky's neglected legacy": Cultural-historical activity theory. Review of Educational Research, 77(2), 186-232.   DOI
26 Cornelius, L. L., & Herrenkohl, L, R. (2004). Power in the classroom: How the classroom environment shapes students' relationship with each other and with concepts. Cognition and Instruction, 22(4), 467-496.   DOI
27 Osborne, J. F., & Collins, S. (2001). Pupils' views of the role and value of the science curriculum: A focus-group study. International Journal of Science Education, 23(5), 441-467.   DOI
28 Patchen, T., & Smithenry, D. W. (2014). Diversifying instruction and shifting authority: a cultural historical activity theory(CHAT) analysis of classroom participant structures. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 51(5), 606-634.   DOI
29 Rodrigues, M. G. (2013). Power and agency in education: exploring the pedagogical dimensions of funds of knowledge. Review of Research in Education, 37, 87-120.   DOI