한국과학교육학회지 (Journal of The Korean Association For Science Education)

  • 제37권4호
  • /
  • Pages.587-597
  • /
  • 2017
  • /
  • 1226-5187(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2288-8489(eISSN)
한국과학교육학회 (The Korean Association for Science Education)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

'애완동물 안내문 만들기' 수업에서 나타나는 초등학생들의 역할 인식과 인식적 권위

Elementary Students' Perceptions of Role and Epistemic Authority in the Activity about 'Making a Pet Poster'

  • 투고 : 2017.06.20
  • 심사 : 2017.07.05
  • 발행 : 2017.08.31
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

과학 교실에서 학생들이 학습의 중심이 되기 위해서는 수업에서 학생들이 목소리를 표현하고 권위를 갖도록 할 필요가 있다. 이를 위해 우리는 '애완동물 안내문 만들기' 수업을 개발하였고, 이 수업에서 초등학생들이 수업의 주체로서 자신들의 역할을 어떻게 인식하고 권위를 드러내는지 탐색하였다. 서울시 G초등학교 4학년 2개 학급학생들을 대상으로 수업을 진행하였으며, 학생들의 활동은 모두 녹음 녹화되었다. 연구 결과, 학생들은 애완동물 안내문을 만드는 소집단 활동과, 전체 학생을 대상으로 발표하고 질의응답하는 전체 발표에서 다른 양상으로 인식적 권위를 드러내는 모습을 보였다. 우선 소집단 활동에서 학생들은 자신들이 가져온 다양한 자원을 활용하고 선별하였으며, 공적인 공간에 적합하도록 자원으로 변형시키는 것과 같이 '애완동물 전문가'로서 권위를 표현하고자 하였다. 전체 발표에서는 발표자와 청중이라는 입장으로 구분되어 발표자는 '애완동물 전문가'로 인정을 받고, 청중은 '검증하는 사람'으로 발표자를 평가하면서, 적극적으로 권위를 검증받고 평가하는 모습을 보였다. 또한 전체 발표의 진행을 주도함으로써 활동의 완전한 주도권을 잡고자 하였다. 연구 결과는 학생 중심으로의 교육 환경 변화에 따른 과학 교육의 전략을 모색하는데 시사점을 제공한다.

If we, as educators, want to put students at the center of learning in science classroom, we must let students express their voices and exercise authority. To do this, we developed a classroom activity about 'Making a pet poster', and then we explored how elementary school students perceived their roles and expressed their authority during this activity. Fourth grade students from an elementary school in the city of Seoul participated in the activity, which was videotaped and recorded. We found that students expressed their epistemic authority differently in small group activities and in whole group discussions. In small group activities, they desired to show their authority as "pet experts" by using and selecting various resources from their everyday lives and transforming those resources into suitable forms in public spaces. Meanwhile, in whole group discussions, participants were classified as either presenters or audience members to verify their authority in regard to the pet poster activity; presenters desired to achieve recognition as "pet experts," and audience members assessed the presenters as "testers." In addition, they expressed authority as teachers by leading the whole group discussions. Based on these findings, this paper suggests the implications for new educational strategies to foster a student-centered learning environment.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Abell, S. K. (2007). Research on science teacher knowledge. In S. K. Abell & N. G. Lederman (eds.), Research on Science Teacher Education (pp. 1105-1149). New York: Routledge.
  2. Archer, L., DeWitt, J., Osborne, J., Dillon, J., Willis, B., & Wong, B. (2010). 'Doing' science vs 'being' a scientist. Science Education, 94(4), 617-639. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20399
  3. Barton, A. C., & Tan, E. (2009). Creating hybrid spaces for engaging school science among urban middle school girls. American Educational Research Journal, 45(1), 68-103. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831207308641
  4. Barton, A. C., Tan, E., & Rivet, A. (2008). Creating hybrid spaces for engaging school science among urban middle school girls. American Educational Research Journal, 45(1), 68-103. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831207308641
  5. Basu, S. J. (2008). How students design and enact physics lessons: Five immigrant caribbean youth and the cultivation of student voice. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 45(8), 881-899. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20257
  6. Cornelius, L. L., & Herrenkohl, L, R. (2004). Power in the classroom: How the classroom environment shapes students' relationship with each other and with concepts. Cognition and Instruction, 22(4), 467-496. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532690Xci2204_4
  7. Crawford, B., Krajcik, J., & Marx, R. (1999). Elements of a community of learners in a middle-school science classroom. Science Education, 83, 701-723. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-237X(199911)83:6<701::AID-SCE4>3.0.CO;2-2
  8. Damsa, C. I., Kirschner, P. A., Andriessen, J. E. B., Erkens, G., & Sins, P. H. M. (2010). Shared epistemic agency: An empirical study of an emergent construct. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 19(2), 143-186. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508401003708381
  9. Donnelly, D. F., McGarr, O., & O'Reilly, J. (2014). "Just be quiet and listen to exactly what he's saying": Conceptualising power relations in inquiry-oriented classrooms. International Journal of Science Education, 36(12), 2029-2054. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2014.889867
  10. Driver, R., Newton, P., & Osborne, J. (2000). Establishing the norms of scientific argumentation in classrooms. Science Education, 84(3), 287-312. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-237X(200005)84:3<287::AID-SCE1>3.0.CO;2-A
  11. Ford, M. (2008). Disciplinary authority and accountability in scientific practice and learning. Science Education, 92, 404-423. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20263
  12. Foucault, M. (1982). The subject and power. Critical Inquiry, 8(4), 777-795. https://doi.org/10.1086/448181
  13. Gonzalez, Molls & Amanti, (2005). Funds of knowledge: Theorizing practices in households, communities, and classrooms. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  14. Jeon, M-J., Kim, H-T., & Kim, J. G. (2012). The characteristic of elementary school students' interest in life and the relationship with their experience about nature. Biology Education, 40(1), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.15717/bioedu.2012.40.1.1
  15. Kim, H., Kang, E., & Kim, H-B. (2015). Expression of students' agency in an elementary school science class : A focus on teaching and learning contexts. The Korean Journal of Biology Education, 43(3), 289-301.
  16. Knorr-Cetina, K. (1999). Epistemic cultures: How the sciences make knowledge. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  17. Latour, B. (1999). Give me a laboratory and I will raise the world. In M. Biagioli (ed.), The science studies reader (pp. 258-75). New York: Routledge.
  18. Ma, S. J.(2004). Attitudes toward pet animals of elementary school students and their relationships with pet ownership and chil-pet interaction. Journal of Korean Practional Arts Education, 17(3), 219-232.
  19. Ministry of Education (2016). 2015 revised science curriculum. Ministry of Education.
  20. Moll, L. C., Amanti, C., Neff, D., & Gonzalez, N. (1992). Funds of knowledge for teaching: Using a qualitative approach to connect homes and classrooms. Theory Into Practice, 31(2), 132-141. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405849209543534
  21. Moreno-Lopez, I. (2005). Sharing power with students: The critical language classroom. Radical Pedagogy, 7(2).
  22. National Research Council (2012). A framework for K-12 Science Education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. Washington DC: The National Academies Press.
  23. Osborne, J. F., & Collins, S. (2001). Pupils' views of the role and value of the science curriculum: A focus-group study. International Journal of Science Education, 23(5), 441-467. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690010006518
  24. Patchen, T., & Smithenry, D. W. (2014). Diversifying instruction and shifting authority: a cultural historical activity theory(CHAT) analysis of classroom participant structures. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 51(5), 606-634. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21140
  25. Rodrigues, M. G. (2013). Power and agency in education: exploring the pedagogical dimensions of funds of knowledge. Review of Research in Education, 37, 87-120. https://doi.org/10.3102/0091732X12462686
  26. Roth, W.-M., & Lee, Y.-J. (2007). "Vygotsky's neglected legacy": Cultural-historical activity theory. Review of Educational Research, 77(2), 186-232. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654306298273
  27. Strauss, A. L., & Corbin, J. M. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. London: Sage.
  28. Stroupe, D. (2014). Examining classroom science practice communities: How teachers and students negotiate epistemic agency and learn science-as-practice. Science Education, 98, 487-516. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21112
  29. Upadhyay, B. R. (2006). Using student's lived experience in an urban science classroom: An elementary school teacher's thinking. Science Education, 90, 94-110. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20095