Journal of Korean Society of Archives and Records Management (한국기록관리학회지)

Korean Society of Archives and Records Management (한국기록관리학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Archival Description and Access in Digital Age that Focuses on the Practices of The National Archives'

디지털 시대의 기록물 기술과 접근 - The National Archives 사례를 중심으로 -

  • Received : 2017.10.25
  • Accepted : 2017.11.16
  • Published : 2017.11.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Because of the creation and transfer of born-digital records, file unit-based record description practices have changed fundamentally. In this study, we analyzed the archival description practices of The National Archives (TNA) to maintain intellectual control in the digital records management environment and to support the access to records of users. TNA has created an archival description based on ISAD(G) but, for describing born-digital records, it changed the guideline for descriptive cataloging practices. As the method of ISAD(G) cannot adhere to born-digital records, the next-generation descriptive standard, Records in Contexts (RiC), is still being developed by ICA. In addition to international efforts, we need to build an archival description system that fits our environment, especially because since the year 2000, TNA's online cataloging system has changed and ISAD(G) has been modified in this process. This study also proposed continuous monitoring of digital archival descriptions, provides an integrated approach to analog records and digital content and strengthens experimentation and cooperation toward an uncertain digital future.

디지털 기록의 생산과 이관으로 인해 파일 단위 기반의 기록물 기술체계가 근본적으로 변화하고 있다. 이에 본 연구에서는 디지털 기록관리 환경에서 기록물의 지적 통제를 유지하고, 지속적인 이용자의 기록물 접근을 지원하기 위한 기록물 기술방식을 TNA의 사례를 통해 분석하였다. TNA는 ISAD(G)를 바탕으로 보존기록을 기술해 왔으며, 디지털 기록의 기술을 위해서는 자체적으로 기술 관행을 수정하였다. 디지털 기록으로 인해 이제는 기존의 ISAD(G) 방식만을 고수할 수 없게 되었고, ICA에서도 차세대 표준인 RiC을 개발하는 중이다. 그러나 국제적인 움직임 외에도 우리 환경에 맞는 기록물 기술체계를 구축하기 위한 노력이 필요하다. 특히 2000년 이후 TNA의 온라인 목록체계는 변했고, 이 과정에서 자체적으로 ISAD(G)를 변형하였다. TNA의 사례는 기관이 당면한 문제를 스스로 해결하기 위한 자생력 강화의 필요성을 일깨워 준다. 이와 더불어 본 연구에서는 디지털 방식의 기록물 기술 결과에 대한 지속적인 모니터링, 아날로그 기록과 디지털 기록의 통합적 접근 제공, 불확실한 디지털 미래를 향한 실험과 협력의 강화를 제안하였다.

Keywords

References

  1. 국가기록원 (2011). NAK/S 14:2011(v2.0) 영구기록물 기술지침.(National Archives of Korea (2011). NAK/S 14:2011. Archival Description Rules. version 2.0.)
  2. 김태수 (2008). 목록의 이해. 서울: 한국도서관협회.(Kim, Taesoo (2008). Understanding the Catalog. Seoul: Korean Library Association.)
  3. 박지영 (2016). 차세대 기록물 기술표준에 관한 연구. 한국기록관리학회지, 16(1), 223-245.(Park, Ziyoung (2016). Analyzing the Next-generation Archival Description Standard: "Recordin Context" of ICA EGAD. Journal of Korean Society of Archives and Records Management,16(1), 223-245.) https://doi.org/10.14404/JKSARM.2016.16.1.223
  4. 박지영 (2017a). ISAD(G)에서 RiC-CM으로의 전환에 관한 연구. 한국기록관리학회지, 17(1), 93-115.(Park, Ziyoung (2017a). Transition of Archival Description from ISAD(G) to Record in Context Conceptual Model. Journal of Korean Society of Archives and Records Management, 17(1), 93-115.) https://doi.org/10.14404/JKSARM.2017.17.1.093
  5. 박지영 (2017b). RiC에 대한 기록공동체의 리뷰를 통해 본 기록물 기술표준 개선을 위한 제안. 기록학연구, 84, 81-109.(Park, Ziyoung (2017b). Improving Archival Descriptive Standard Based on the Analysis of the Reviews by Archival Communities on RiC-CM Draft. The Korean Journal of Archival Studies, 84, 81-109.)
  6. 윤은하 (2011). 북미 기록학의 동향과 전망. 한국기록관리학회지, 11(2), 77-94.(Youn, Eunha (2011). Archival Studies in North America: Current Developments and Trends. Journal of Korean Society of Archives and Records Management, 11(2), 77-94.)
  7. Artefactual Systems Inc (2017). "Artefactual responds to draft ICA standard (Records in Context)" (email message from AtoM Program Manager Dan Gillean on the behalf of Artefactual staff to ICA EGAD). Retrieved October 31, 2017, from https://goo.gl/vF8pZH
  8. Associazione Nazionale Archivistica Italiana (Sezione Toscana) (2016). Record In Contexts: A Conceptual Model For Archival Description: Il contributo italiano.
  9. Carroll, L. et al. (2011). A Comprehensive Approach to Born-Digital Archives. Archivaria, 72, 61-92.
  10. Clavaud, F. et al. (2015). ICA Expert Group on Archival Description: Interim Report on the Development of a Conceptual Model. 20th. Aug. 2015. Cleveland: SAA Annual Meeting.
  11. Cutter, C. A. (1904). Rules for a Printed Dictionary Catalogue. 4th ed. [Washington: Govt. print, off.].
  12. Duranti, L. (2016). Comments on "Records in Context." InterPARES Trust.
  13. Gueguen, G. et al. (2013). Toward an International Conceptual Model for Archival Description:A Preliminary Report from the International Council on Archives' Experts Group onArchival Description. The American Archivist, 76(2), 566-583.
  14. ICA (1999). General International Standard Archival Description. 2nd edition.
  15. ICA (2004). International Standard Archival Authority Records-Corporate Bodies, Persons, and Families. 2nd edition.
  16. ICA (2011). International Standard for Describing Function.
  17. ICA EGAD (2016). Record In Contexts: A Conceptual Model For Archival Description. Consultation Draft v.0.1.
  18. Klareld, A. & Gidlund, K. L. (2017). Rethinking Archives as Digital: The Consequences of "Paper Minds" in Illustrations and Definitions of E-archives. Archivaria, 83, 81-108.
  19. McKemmish, S. et al. (1999). Describing Records in Context in the Continuum: The Australian Recordkeeping Metadata Schema. Archivaria, 48, 3-37.
  20. McKemmish, S. & Piggott, M. (2013). Toward the Archival Multiverse: Challenging the Binary Opposition of the Personal and Corporate Archive in Modern Archival Theory and Practice. Archivaria, 76, 111-114.
  21. Niu, J. (2016). Linked Data for Archives. Archivaria, 82, 83-110.
  22. Reed, B. (2017). New conceptual model for recordkeeping description, Records in Contexts. Recordkeeping Innovation. Posted. 1. Feb. 2017. Retrieved October 31, 2017, from http://www.records.com.au/new-conceptual-model-for-recordkeeping-description-records-in-contexts/
  23. TNA (2017a). The National Archives' Digital Strategy 2017-2019. Retrieved October 31, 2017, from https://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/documents/the-national-archives-digital-strategy-2017-19.pdf
  24. TNA (2017b). Digital Cataloguing Practice.
  25. TNA (2017c). Digital Inspire. 2015-2017.
  26. TNA (2017d). Cataloguing paper records: guidance for government departments.
  27. TNA Blog (2016). Making connections: tracing people through our collection. Retrieved October 31, 2017, from http://blog.nationalarchives.gov.uk/blog/making-connections-tracing-people-collection/
  28. TNA Discovery (2017). Discovery Web sites. Retrieved October 31, 2017, from http://discovery.nationalarchives.gov.uk/
  29. Trace, C. B. (2011). Beyond the Magic to the Mechanism: Computers, Materiality, and What It Means for Records to Be "Born Digital." Archivaria, 72, 5-27.
  30. Upward, F., McKemmish, S., & Reed, B. (2011). Archivists and changing social and information spaces: A continuum approach to recordkeeping and archiving in online cultures. Archivaria, 72, 197-237.
  31. Yeo, G. (2012a). The Conceptual Fonds and the Physical Collection. Archivaria, 73, 43-80.
  32. Yeo, G. (2012b). Bringing Things Together: Aggregate Records in a Digital Age. Archivaria, 74, 43-91.