DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

미학(美學)적 분석으로 본 루이스 칸 건축의 구조주의적 해석 -뤼힝거와 베네딕트의 구조주의적 해석 비판을 중심으로-

A Study on the Interpretation of Structuralism & Post-Structuralism in Louis I. Kahn's Architecture with the View of Aesthetics -focused on the review of Arnulf Lüchinger's and Michael Benedikt's interpretation of Structuralism & Post-Structuralism-

  • 권태일 (동의대학교 건설공학부 건축공학전공)
  • 투고 : 2017.10.14
  • 심사 : 2017.12.20
  • 발행 : 2017.12.31

초록

One of the reasons why Louis I. Kahn is regarded as a pioneer of Post-Modern Architecture is that his works are interpreted as Structuralism and Post-structuralism in architecture. A. $L{\ddot{u}}chinger^{\prime}s$ interpretation of Structuralism and M. Benedikt's interpretation of Post-structuralism; especially Deconstruction Theory, in Kahn's architecture must be proper cases for understanding this context. However, when we precisely analyze their insistence, several fallacies can be found with their incomplete grasp of Kahn's architectural thinking. The most problematic thing is that they maximize fallibility with focusing only on the analysis of superficial phenomenon, such as formal composition, disposition of space, decorative features, and so on. Therefore, the meaning of architectural essence toward Post-Modern Architecture which Kahn had pursued during his lifetime is sometimes misinterpreted. For this reason, this paper attempt to reanalyze Kahn's philosophy of architecture deeply with the view of aesthetics which has a key role in both overcoming their fallacies and illuminating the potentiality of Kahn's architecture.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Alessandra Latour (ed.), Louis I. Kahn: Writings, Lecture, Interviews, Rizzoli, New York, 1991
  2. Alexandra Tyng, Beginnings; Louis I. Kahn's Philosophy of Architecture, Wiley-Interscience, New York, 1984
  3. Annie Pedret, Team 10: an archival history, Routledge, 2013
  4. Christopher Norris & Andrew Benjamin, What is Deconstruction? , Academy Editions, 1988
  5. C. N. Schultz, Kahn, Heidegger and the Language of Architecture, Oppositions, Vol.18, 1979
  6. Robert Twombly (ed.), Louis Kahn: Essential Texts, W.W. Norton & Company, 2003
  7. J. Derrida, Writing and Difference, The University of Chicago Press, 1999
  8. Michael Benedikt, Deconstructing the Kimbell, An Essay on Meaning and Architecture, Sites Books, 1991
  9. Patricia McLaughlin, The Interview with L. I. Kahn, Pennsylvania Gazette, Dec. 1972
  10. Richard Saul Wurman & Eugene Feldman (eds.), The Notebooks and Drawings of Louis I. Kahn, Falcon Press, Philadelphia, 1962
  11. Tomas Valena (ed.), StructuralismReloaded: Rule-Based Design in Architecture and Urbanism, Edition AxelMenges, 2011
  12. 前田忠直, ルイス.カーン硏究: 思惟の方法と存在論的 建築, 博士學位論文, 京都大學, 1989
  13. A. Luchinger, '구조주의건축과 도시계획', 최종현.이기민 역, 세진사, 1989
  14. Alexandra Tyng, '루이스 칸의 건축철학', 서유석.이강주역, 태림문화사, 1996
  15. C. Levi-Strauss, '야생의 사고', 안정남 역, 한길사, 2014
  16. F. de Saussure, '일반 언어학 강의', 최승언 역, 민음사, 2012
  17. Nicolai Hartmann, '미학', 전원배 역, 을유문화사, 1997
  18. Terry Eagleton, '문학이론입문', 김명환외2인역, 창작과비평사, 2001
  19. 권태일, '하르트만의 미학으로 본 루이스 칸의 '건축의 본질'의 존재구조와 표현체계', 건축역사연구, 22권, 4호, 2013. 8.
  20. 김문환, '미학의 이해', 문예출판사, 2000
  21. 김상환, '해체론 시대의 철학', 문학과지성사, 1999
  22. 미학대계간행회, '미학의 문제와 방법', 서울대학교출판부, 2008
  23. 박이문, '예술철학', 문학과지성사, 2004
  24. 이종건, '해체주의 건축의 해체', 발언, 1999