I. INTRODUCTION
Ultra-high definition displays mainly drive high-speed interconnect markets in consumer electronics. Display interfaces such as DisplayPort, high-definition multimedia interface (HDMI), and mobile high-definition link (MHL) are required to have more data rates, more pixels, and longer transmission distances. As demands on long-distance display interconnects have increased, optical interconnect technology makes inroads into existing copper-based inter-connects. The optical receiver is one of the most critical components in optical interconnect systems. The optical receiver has an optimum bandwidth for the target bitrates due to the trade-off between inter-symbol interference and noise. However, the strong correlation between bandwidth, noise, conversion gain, and power efficiency of the optical receiver is the hardest part to adjust as a function of the bit rate. In this paper, we report a power-adjustable fullyintegrated CMOS optical receiver for DisplayPort 1.3 having multi data rates: 1.62, 2.7, 5.4, and 8.1 Gbps.
II. OPTICAL RECEIVER AND EXPERIMENTAL SETUP
The optical receiver for DisplayPort 1.3 should be fully backwards compatible with earlier DisplayPort standards, i.e. it has to cover multi data rates: 1.62, 2.7, 5.4 and 8.1 Gbps. DisplayPort also embeds the clock signal inside the data signal, so the receiver should be accompanied with clockand-data recovery (CDR) circuits [1, 2]. Figure 1(a) shows the structure of the proposed optical receiver. The receiver can be divided into two main sections. One is an analog front-end (AFE), and the other is a phase-lockedloop(PLL)-based CDR circuit.
FIG. 1.(a) Structure of the bandwidth-adjustable optical receiver and (b) Block diagram of phase-locked-loop-based clock-and-data recovery circuits.
The AFE consists of a shunt-feedback pre-amplifier with DC-offset cancellation (DOC) buffer and four-stage post-amplifier (PA). The optimum bandwidth of the AFE for the best optical sensitivity is about 0.7 times the target bitrate because of the trade-off between inter-symbol interference (ISI) and noise [3-7]. Though source-degenerated equalizer with capacitance bank can easily control the bandwidth of the receiver, this scheme has low power efficiency at low-speed operation [8]. In this paper, we adjust the bandwidth by scaling supply voltage. And the feedback resistance (RF) is simultaneously controlled to maintain the conversion gain. Through the adjustment, the receiver can have the best optical sensitivity and power efficiency over all operating ranges.
The PLL-based CDR has a dual-loop sequential locking scheme, as shown in Fig. 1(b). A frequency tracking loop with a phase-frequency detector (PFD), a charge pump (CP), a loop filter (LF), and ring voltage-controlled oscillator (ring-VCO) locks the output clock phase of ring-VCO to that of the 135-MHz input reference clock (fREF). According to the bit rates of the input data, a programmable frequency divider (Prog FD) having dividing factors of 6, 10, 20, and 30 can control the output clock frequency to be half of the input bit rates, 0.81, 1.35, 2.7, and 4.05 GHz. Once a lock detector (LD) detects the frequency of fVCO/M is equal to fREF, it disables the frequency tracking loop and enables the phase tracking loop by simply controlling a multiplexer. The phase tracking loop leads to phase locking through the half-rate bang-bang phase detector (BBPD), and the BBPD finally retimes the data with the extracted clock. Two bits of digital inputs, mode<1:0>, indicate what data rate comes into the input ports: 00, 01, 10, and 11 signals present 1.62, 2.7, 5.4, and 8.1 Gbps, respectively.
Ring-type VCO is composed of 3-stage inverters and current mirrors for delay control. The current of the inverter is controlled by both analog tuning voltage though the LF and digital codes, Early/Late, from the BBPD. With these, the VCO has fast locking and wide tuning characteristics. Tuning range of the VCO is 0.5 to 4.4 GHz and the worst phase noise is 95.8 dBc/Hz at 10-MHz offset.
III. BANDWIDTH ADJUSTMENT OF ANALOG FRONT-END
Figure 2 shows the schematic of the AFE. To adjust the bandwidth, VDDAFE is scaled down from 1.2V to 0.9V as a function of the bit rates by controlling mode<1:0>. And common-source topology is used for all amplifiers to make bandwidth of the AFE be able to change according to VDDAFE [9, 10]. In the shunt-feedback pre-amplifiers, lower supply voltage makes the conversion gain be small as well as the bandwidth. By increasing the feedback resistance (RF), the gain can be kept to the desired value [11]. Each resistance of the parallel resistor bank is optimized to the four bit rates, and mode<1:0> controls each NMOS switches through a one-hot decoder. The RF is designed to be 2, 3.3, 6.2, and 10 kΩ for 8.1-, 5.4-, 2.7-, and 1.62-Gbps data rates, respectively.
FIG. 2.Schematic of optical receiver analog front-end circuits.
Figure 3 shows measured 3-dB bandwidth, optical sensitivity for 10−9 bit error rate (BER), conversion gain, and power efficiency as a function of target bit rates with and without adjusting bandwidth. Without any adjustment, 41.5, 24.8, 12.4, and 8.3 pJ/bit of power efficiency is measured at each bit rate. And the experiment results indicate −17.1, −16.8, −15.9, and −15.4 dBm of optical sensitivities without scaling, respectively. Smaller differences than expected between the sensitivities are caused by high frequency noise due to wider bandwidth than the optimal value. When scaling both VDDAFE and RF, the bandwidth can be closer to the optimum value and better sensitivities are hereby obtained than in the case of scaling only VDDAFE, as shown in Fig. 3(a) and 3(b). Also almost the same conversion gains can be achieved by controlling RF, as depicted in Fig. 3(c). Through these bandwidth adjustments, the AFE exhibits uniform power efficiency over the all bit rates and better sensitivity with higher conversion gain, as described in Fig. 3(d) [12].
FIG 3.(a) 3-dB bandwidth, (b) optical sensitivity, (c) conversion gain, and (d) power efficiency as a function of target bit rates with and without bandwidth adjustment.
IV. CHIP IMPLEMENTATION AND EXPERIMENTAL RESULTS
Figure 4 shows the measurement setup and chip micro-photograph. The prototype receiver is realized in 65-nm CMOS technology. The chip occupies 1.3 mm by 1.2 mm including ESD diodes and bonding pads. The core size is 0.8 mm by 0.7 mm. All experiments are done on-wafer. To measure optical performances of the receiver, a photo-detector (PD) equivalent circuit is realized on the chip as depicted in Fig. 4 as an inset. 150 fF of PN junction capacitance, 2 kΩ of series resistor, and 50 Ω of parallel resistor are implemented near the input bonding pads. Through this PD model, voltage signals from the equipment are converted into current signals with ratio of 10,000:1, i.e. 100-mVp-p input voltage is converted into 50-μAp-p photo-current. Additional output buffer (OB) located between the AFE and the CDR in the Fig. 1(a) helps us to measure performances of AFE only. With the AFE output ports (AFEOUT) frequency response, transient signal quality, and optical sensitivity are measured as depicted in Fig. 2. Optical sensitivity can be easily calculated based on measured input photocurrents (iPD), typical extinction ratio of the VCSEL (re=9), and responsivity (ρ=0.8) of the photodiode with equation (1). With bandwidth adjustment, 1.15-, 1.8-, 3.8-, 5.8-GHz of bandwidth and −23.7-, −20.1-, −18.6-, and −15.4-dBm of optical sensitivity are measured at 1.62-, 2.7-, 5.4-, and 8.1-Gbps bit rates. 135-MHz reference clock signal for the CDR is provided by a function generator. Figure 5 shows the retimed output eye diagrams of the half-rate CDR according to the bit rates. The eye diagrams are obtained with the lowest optical power for 10−9 BER. Duty cycle mismatch of about 15% occurred due to PVT variations of the half-rate CDR, however, all eyes are valid in more than 0.9 unit interval.
FIG. 4.Measurement setup and chip microphotograph.
FIG. 5.Retimed output eye diagrams of the half-rate CDR.
V. CONCLUSIONS
A bandwidth-adjustable optical receiver with multi-rate CDR is realized in 65-nm standard CMOS technology. With supply voltage and feedback resistance scaling, the receiver front-end has the optimum bandwidth at 1.62-, 2.7-, 5.4-, and 8.1-Gbps data rate without any other performance degradation. As a result, better optical sensitivity and power efficiency at low-speed operation are achieved. The proposed receiver makes an optical module for long-haul display interconnects, such as DisplayPort and HDMI, more easily have backward compatibility to their previous standards.
References
- “VESA,” [Online]. Available: http://www.vesa.org/uncategorized/vesa-releases-displayport-1-3-standard/ [Accessed: 30-June-2016].
-
J.-C. Seo, Y.-H. Moon, J.-H. Seo, J.-Y. Jang, T.-J. An, and J.-K. Kang, “A 1.62/2.7/5.4 Gbps Clock and Data Recovery Circuit for DisplayPort 1.2 with a single VCO,” J. of Semicon. TECH. SCI.
13 , 185 (2013). https://doi.org/10.5573/JSTS.2013.13.3.185 -
C. Hermans and M. Steyaert, “A High-Speed 850-nm Optical Receiver Front-End in 0.18-μm CMOS,” IEEE J. Solid-State Circuits
41 , 1606-1614 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1109/JSSC.2006.873855 -
S. H. Park, Q. Le, and B. Choi, “An Optical Transimpedance Amplifier Using an Inductive Buffer Stage Technique,” IEICE Trans. on Comm.
E92-B , 2239-2242 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1587/transcom.E92.B.2239 -
W.-Z. Chen, Y.-L. Cheng, and D.-S. Lin, “A 1.8V 10-Gb/s Fully Integrated CMOS Optical Receiver Analog Front-End,” IEEE J. of Solid-State Circuits
40 , 1388-1396 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1109/JSSC.2005.845970 -
W.-Z. Chen and C.-H. Lu, “A 2.5 Gbps CMOS optical receiver analog front-end,” in
Proc. IEEE Custom Integrated Circuits Conf . (Orlando, USA, 2002), pp. 359-362. -
W.-S. Oh, K. Park, K.-H. Park, C.-J. Kim, and J.-K. Moon, “Design and Implementation of 10-Gb/s Optical Receiver Analog Front-End in 0.13-μm CMOS Technology,” IEICE Trans. on Electron.
E93-C , 393-398 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1587/transele.E93.C.393 -
J. -S. Youn, M.-J. Lee, K. Park, H. Rucker, and W.-Y. Choi, “A bandwidth adjustable integrated optical receiver with on-chip silicon avalanche photodetector,” IEICE Electron. Express
8 , 404-409 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1587/elex.8.404 -
Y.-H. Chien, K.-L. Fu, and S.-I. Liu, “A 3-25 Gb/s Four-Channel Receiver With Noise-Canceling TIA and Power-Scalable LA,” IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst. II, Exp. Briefs
61 , 845-849 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1109/TCSII.2014.2350372 -
K. Park, B. C. Kim, B. Jung, and W.-S. Oh, “A 1-13 Gbps tunable optical receiver with supply voltage scaling,” IEICE Electron. Express
11 , 20140733 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1587/elex.11.20140733 -
J. Sangirov, I. A. Ukaegbu, T.-W. Lee, M. H. Cho, and H.-H. Park, “10 Gbps Transimpedance Amplifier-Receiver for Optical Interconnects,” J. Opt. Soc. Korea
17 , 44-49 (2013). https://doi.org/10.3807/JOSK.2013.17.1.044 -
E. Sackinger, “The Transimpedance Limit,” IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst. I, Reg. Papers
57 , 1848-1856 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1109/TCSI.2009.2037847