DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Concept Analysis of Volition for Health Behavior Practice in Patients with Chronic Disease

만성질환자의 건강행위 실천을 위한 의지(volition)에 대한 개념분석

  • Lee, Mi Ja (Division of Nursing Science, College of Health Science, Ewha Womans University) ;
  • Kim, Min Ju (Division of Nursing Science, College of Health Science, Ewha Womans University)
  • 이미자 (이화여자대학교 건강과학대학 간호학부) ;
  • 김민주 (이화여자대학교 건강과학대학 간호학부)
  • Received : 2016.02.09
  • Accepted : 2016.07.04
  • Published : 2016.10.31

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to define and clarify the concept of volition for health behavior. Methods: For this study the process of Walker & Avant's concept analysis was used. Seventeen studies from electronic data basses met criteria for selection. Results: Volition can be defined by the following attributes: 1) planning, 2) maintenance of self-efficacy, and 3) self regulation. The antecedents of volition consisted of: 1) risk awareness, 2) outcome expectation, 3) perceived self-efficacy, and 4) social support. The consequences occurring as a result of volition were: 1) prevention of disability and complications, 2) improvement of functional ability, and 3) enhencement of quailty of life. Conclusion: Definition and attributes of volition identified by this results can be applied to develop measurements and intervention programs for chronic patients health behavior.

Keywords

References

  1. Atkinson JW, Birch D. An introduction to motivation. 2nd ed. New York, NY: Van Nostrand; 1978. p. 1-405.
  2. Weiner B. A theory of motivation for some classroom experiences. Journal of Educational Psychology. 1979;71(1):3-25. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.71.1.3
  3. Kehr HM. Implicit/explicit motive discrepancies and volitional depletion among managers. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin. 2004;30(3):315-327. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0146167203256967
  4. Heckhausen H, Kuhl J. From wishes to action: The dead ends and shortcuts on the long way to action. In: Frese M, Sarini J, editors. Goal-directed behavior: Psychological theory and research on action. Hillsdale NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 1985. p. 134-160
  5. Pintrich PR, Schunk DH. Motivation in education: Theory research and practice. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall; 1996. p. 1-434.
  6. National Institute of Korean Language. Standard Korean dictionary. Seoul: Doosan Dong A; 1999.
  7. Haggard P, Lau H. What is volition? Experimental Brain Research. 2013;229(3):285-287. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00221-013-3582-5
  8. Kuhl J. Self-regulation and metamotivation: Computational mechanisms, development and assessment. In: R. Kanfer, PL Ackerman, R. Cudeck (Eds.), The Minnesota symposium on learning and individual differences. Abilities, motivation, and methodology Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum; 1989. p. 343-374.
  9. Walker LO, Avant KC. Strategies for theory construction in nursing. 5th ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall; 2011. p. 1-243.
  10. YBM Si-sa. Si-sa elite English-Korean dictionary. 6th ed. Seoul: YBM; 2006.
  11. Gollwitzer PM. Volition. In: Kazdin AE, editor. Encyclopedia of psychology. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association; 2000. p. 210-214.
  12. Kuhl J. Volitional aspects of achievement motivation and learned helplessness: Toward a comprehensive theory of action control. Progress in Experimental Personality Research. 1984;13:99-171.
  13. Dornyei Z. Motivation in action: Towards a process-oriented conceptualisation of student motivation. The British Journal of Educational Psychology. 2000;70(Pt 4):519-538. https://doi.org/10.1348/000709900158281
  14. Beckmann J. Metaprocesses and the regulation of behavior. In: Halisch F, Kuhl J, editors. Motivation, intention, and volition. Berlin, DE: Springer; 1987. p. 371-386.
  15. Kuhl J. Motivation, konflikt und handlungskontrolle [Motivation, conflict, and action control]. Berlin, DE: Springer; 1983. p. 1-356.
  16. Heckhausen J, Heckhausen H, editors. Motivation and action. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press; 2008. p. 1-508.
  17. Park DY. An analysis on the causal structure of academic cognition.affection.conation and achievement [dissertation]. Cheongju: Korea National University of Education; 2000. p. 1-206.
  18. Elbe AM, Szymanski B, Beckmann J. The development of volition in young elite athletes. Psychology of Sport and Exercise. 2005;6 (5):559-569. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2004.07.004
  19. Corno L. Self regulating learning: A volitional analysis. In: Zimmerman DJ, Schunk DH, editors. Self regulated learning and academic achievement: Theory, research and practice. New York, NY: Springer; 1989. p. 111-141.
  20. Ko YK, Kim HK, Choi BS. Analyses of volition strategy by achievement level of the students with high learning motivation. Journal of The Korean Association for Science Education. 2006; 26(3):376-384.
  21. Berli C, Ochsner S, Stadler G, Knoll N, Hornung R, Scholz U. Volitional processes and daily smoking: Examining inter- and intraindividual associations around a quit attempt. Journal of Behavioral Medicine. 2015;38(2):306-317. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10865-014-9598-x
  22. Scholz U, Nagy G, Schuz B, Ziegelmann JP. The role of motivational and volitional factors for self-regulated running training: Associations on the between- and within- person level. The British Journal of Social Psychology. 2008;47(Pt 3):421-439. http://dx.doi.org/10.1348/014466607$\chi$266606
  23. Norman P, Abraham C, Conner M, editors. Understanding and changing health behaviour: From health beliefs to self-regulation. 2nd ed. Amsterdam, NL: Harwood Academic Publishers; 2010.
  24. Bandura A. Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York, NY: W. H. Freeman & Company; 1997. p. 1-604.
  25. Heo S, Moser DK, Chung ML, Lennie TA. Social status, healthrelated quality of life, and event-free survival in patients with heart failure. European Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing. 2012;11(2) :141-149. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejcnurse.2010.10.003
  26. Sniehotta FF, Scholz U, Schwarzer R. Bridging the intention-behaviour gap: Planning, self-efficacy, and action control in the adoption and maintenance of physical exercise. Psychology and Health. 2005;20(2):143-160. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/08870440512331317670
  27. French DP, Stevenson A, Michie S. An intervention to increase walking requires both motivational and volitional components: A replication and extension. Psychology, Health & Medicine. 2012; 17(2):127-135. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13548506.2011.592843
  28. Luszczynska A, Schwarzer R. Planning and self-efficacy in the adoption and maintenance of breast self-examination: A longitudinal study on self-regulatory cognitions. Psychology & Health. 2003 ;18(1):93-108. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0887044021000019358
  29. Sheeran P, Harris PR, Epton T. Does heightening risk appraisals change people's intentions and behavior?A meta-analysis of experimental studies. Psychological Bulletin. 2014;140(2):511-543. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0033065
  30. Ziegelmann JP, Lippke S, Schwarzer R. Adoption and maintenance of physical activity: Planning interventions in young, middle-aged, and older adults. Psychology & Health. 2006;21(2):145-163. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1476832050018891

Cited by

  1. 건강행위 이행율에 따른 대사증후군 발생 위험요인 변화 vol.28, pp.3, 2016, https://doi.org/10.7465/jkdi.2017.28.3.559
  2. 만성 심부전 환자의 스마트폰을 활용한 자가관리에 대한 인식 : 포커스 그룹 인터뷰 적용 vol.16, pp.9, 2018, https://doi.org/10.14400/jdc.2018.16.9.319
  3. 만성질환자의 공유의사결정 개념분석 vol.10, pp.11, 2016, https://doi.org/10.15207/jkcs.2019.10.11.543
  4. Factors Affecting the Intention to Modify Lifestyle in the Cardiovascular Disease Risk Group in Korea vol.9, pp.5, 2016, https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare9050496