Participants' Evaluation on the Payer-driven Medication Counseling Intervention for Individuals with Chronic Disease

만성질환자 대상 맞춤형 투약상담 중재 프로그램 시범사업에 대한 평가

  • Sohn, Hyun Soon (School of Pharmacy, CHA University) ;
  • Jang, Sunmee (College of Pharmacy, Gachon University) ;
  • Lee, Ju-Yeun (College of Pharmacy, Institute of Pharmaceutical Science and Technology, Hanyang University) ;
  • Han, Euna (College of Pharmacy, Yonsei University)
  • Received : 2015.11.10
  • Accepted : 2016.08.03
  • Published : 2016.09.30

Abstract

Objective: This study was conducted to evaluate payer-driven medication adherence intervention program from the patient's and counselor's perspectives. Methods: Target patients for intervention were selected by retrospective adherence measures based on national health insurance claims data for hypertension, diabetes and hyperlipidemia. As a serial intervention for higher risk groups of medication non-adherence, initial direct mailing, the first direct telephone call and the second direct call or a home visit were followed. Interview approach to qualitative inquiry was used to evaluate intervention results. Results: Participants including 4 patients received telephone calls, and 4 National Health Insurance Service staff and 4 pharmacists participated as counselors were interviewed regarding their impression of the intervention program. Three major themes arose: overall perception; necessities; and suggestions for success, of the intervention. Despite short period of intervention, educational intervention by telephone counseling involving pharmacists shows potential to improve self-management of chronic disease, and pharmacist-involvement. But more sophisticated selection of target patients requiring the intervention and complementation of electronic database system would be necessary. In addition, personal disposition of counselor was revealed to be an important factor for achieving successful outcome of intervention. Conclusion: The findings suggest that the individualized counseling intervention would be an efficient option for improved medication adherence. Further researches should include longer periods of interventions, a quantitative analysis using adherence measures based on claims data and consideration of clinical benefits associated with the intervention.

Keywords

References

  1. Ministry of Health Welfare. Newsletter dated May 16, 2014. Subject:Strengthening of preventive management of cerebrovascular diseases. Available from http://www.mw.go.kr/front_new/al/sal0301vw.jsp?PAR_MENU_ID=04&MENU_ID=0403&CONT_SEQ=300682&page=1. Accessed March 20, 2015.
  2. Korea Center for Disease Control. Public relation material: Booklet on 9 daily life tips for preventive management of cerebrovascular diseases. 2009. Available from http://www.cdc.go.kr/CDC/notice/CdcKrIntro0504.jsp?menuIds=HOME001-MNU1154-MNU0004-MNU0110&cid=11063. Accessed March 20, 2015.
  3. Hong JS, Kang HC. Oral Antihyperglycemic Medication Adherence and Its Associated Factors among Ambulatory Care with Adult Type 2 Diabetes Patients in Korea. Korean J of Health Policy & Administration 2010;20(2):128-43. https://doi.org/10.4332/KJHPA.2010.20.2.128
  4. Jang SM, Song HJ, Shin SY, et al. Development of Evaluation Index of Antihypertensives. Heath Insurance Review and Assessment Report. Seoul; 2008.
  5. Shin SY, Song HJ, Jang SM, Sung YN. Development of A Evaluation Index of Lipid Lowering Agents. Heath Insurance Review and Assessment Report. Seoul; 2009.
  6. Wu JY, Leung WY, Chang S, et al. Effectiveness of telephone counselling by a pharmacist in reducing mortality in patients receiving polypharmacy:randomised controlled trial. BMJ 2006;333(7567):522. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.38905.447118.2F
  7. Ryan R, Santesso N, Lowe D, et al. Interventions to improve safe and effective medicines use by consumers: an overview of systematic reviews. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2014;4:CD007768.
  8. Jang SM, Han E, Park TJ, et al. Development of appropriate medication management program to support rational healthcare utilization. Heath Insurance Review and Assessment Report. Seoul; 2012.
  9. Sofaer S. Qualitative methods: What are they and why use them? Health Service Research 1999;34:5(5 Pt2):1101-18.
  10. Chung JJ, Cho JJ. Use of Qualitative Research in the Field of Health. J Korean Acad Fam Med 2008;29:553-62.
  11. Benner JS, Glynn RJ, Mogun H, et al. Long-term persistence in use of statin therapy in elderly patients. JAMA. 2002;288(4):455-61. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.288.4.455
  12. Johnell K, Rastam L, Lithman T, et al. Low adherence with antihypertensives in actual practice: the association with social participation-a multilevel analysis. BMC Public Health. 2005;5:17. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-5-17
  13. Zhang NJ, Terry A, McHorney CA. Impact of health literacy on medication adherence: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Pharmacother 2014;48(6):741-51. https://doi.org/10.1177/1060028014526562
  14. Britten N. Qualitative interviews in medical research. BMJ 1995;311(6999):251-3. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.311.6999.251
  15. Doggrell SA. Adherence to medicines in the older-aged with chronic conditions: does intervention by an allied health professional help? Drugs Aging 2010;27(3):239-54. https://doi.org/10.2165/11532870-000000000-00000
  16. Viswanathan M, Golin CE, Jones CD, et al. Interventions to improve adherence to self-administered medications for chronic diseases in the United States: a systematic review. Ann Intern Med 2012;157(11):785-95. https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-157-11-201212040-00538
  17. Friedman RH, Kazis LE, Jette A, et al. A telecommunications system for monitoring and counseling patients with hypertension. Impact on medication adherence and blood pressure control. Am J Hypertens 1996;9(4 Pt 1):285-92. https://doi.org/10.1016/0895-7061(95)00353-3
  18. Jones C. Medication adherence study looks at types of interventions. Manag Care 2014;23(9):38-41.