Developing a Drug Information Leaflet of Antihypertensives for Senior Citizens; Employing Performance-based User-testing

수행능력 기반 사용자 평가를 활용한 노인용 고혈압치료제 안전사용설명서 개발

  • 김진 (영남대학교 약학대학) ;
  • 이인향 (영남대학교 약학대학)
  • Received : 2016.08.17
  • Accepted : 2016.09.23
  • Published : 2016.09.30

Abstract

Objective: Written information could be helpful for senior population to adhere to complex medication therapies, but must be well prepared and empirically assessed to achieve such end. We purposed to develop a drug information leaflet for senior citizens by applying 'performance-based user-testing.' Methods: We employed a user-testing, a mixed method to figure difficulties out with patients' leaflets from the user perspective. The cycle made of test and revision can be repeated as necessary. We recruited senior citizens with age of 65 or above who were taking antihypertensive medications at the point of participating and excluded the elderly who suffered illiteracy. We firstly rectified a drug information leaflet of antihypertensive medications for the general public distributed by the Korean authority based on focus group interviews (9 participants). The revised leaflets were tested four times with 8~12 participants in each round (40 seniors in total). We targeted to develop a leaflet which more than 80% of participants understood 10 key information. Main outcomes measures were to be able to find information and be able to understand information. This study was approved by the Yeungnam University Research Ethics Committee. Results: Focus group interviews identified difficulties with small font of words, professional language, long information, and a poor structure. The leaflet was revised and in the first round questionnaire found problems with 4/10 information points; interviews disclosed all but one (normal blood pressure range) were ill-understood. The second round questionnaire and interview found fewer problems but the comprehensiveness of participants was still poor in several points. For the third and fourth rounds we revised the leaflets in the individual-targeted manner. Finally, the fourth round showed all key information found and understood by at least 80% of participants except one question about drug name. Conclusion: The drug leaflets need to be developed in a personalized mode for the seniors. There was a limit for Korean seniors to understand nonproprietary name of their drugs because they used to producers' trade names which the Korean health system predominantly works with.

Keywords

References

  1. Lee JY. Current status of education in the safety use of drugs and introduction of model cases. J Pharm Policy Res 2013;7(2):32-41.
  2. Ministry of Health & Welfare. White paper for health and welfare 2014. Sejong: Ministry of Health & Welfare 2015;29.
  3. Bates DW, Spell N, Cullen DJ, et al. The costs of adverse drug events in hospitalized patients. Adverse Drug Events Prevention Study Group. JAMA 1997;277(4):307-11. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.1997.03540280045032
  4. Kasbekar R, Maples M, Bernacchi A, et al. The pharmacist's role in preventing medication errors in older adults. Consult Pharm 2014;29(12):838-42. https://doi.org/10.4140/TCP.n.2014.838
  5. Britten N. Medicines in the lifeworld. Medicines and society: Patients, professionals and the dominance of pharmaceuticals. Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan, 2008;45-63.
  6. Grissinger MC, Globus NJ, Fricker MP, Jr. The role of managed care pharmacy in reducing medication errors. J Manag Care Pharm 2003;9(1):62-5.
  7. Classen DC, Pestotnik SL, Evans RS, et al. Adverse drug events in hospitalized patients. Excess length of stay, extra costs, and attributable mortality. JAMA 1997;277(4):301-6. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.1997.03540280039031
  8. Gandhi TK, Weingart SN, Borus J, et al. Adverse drug events in ambulatory care. N Engl J Med 2003;348(16):1556-64. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMsa020703
  9. Feste C, Anderson RM. Empowerment: from philosophy to practice. Patient Educ Couns 1995;26(1-3):139-44. https://doi.org/10.1016/0738-3991(95)00730-N
  10. Anderson RM, Funnell MM, Butler PM, et al. Patient empowerment. Results of a randomized controlled trial. Diabetes Care 1995;18(7):943-9. https://doi.org/10.2337/diacare.18.7.943
  11. Samoocha D, Bruinvels DJ, Elbers NA, Anema JR, van der Beek AJ. Effectiveness of web-based interventions on patient empowerment: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Med Internet Res 2010;12(2):e23. https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.1286
  12. Zarcadoolas C, Pleasant AF, Greer DS. Defining health literacy. Advancing health literacy: A framework for understanding and action. San Francisco, CA: Whiley, 2006;45-67.
  13. Hall J, Peat M, Birks Y, et al. Effectiveness of interventions designed to promote patient involvement to enhance safety: a systematic review. Insight 2010;35(2):18.
  14. Son M-J, Lee I-H. Performance-based uset testing of a patient drug leaflet in the elderly. Korean J Clin Pharm 2016;26(1):6-12.
  15. Raynor DK, Knapp P, Silcock J, et al. "User-testing" as a method for testing the fitness-for-purpose of written medicine information. Patient Educ Couns 2011;83(3):404-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2011.03.016
  16. Guest G, Bunce A, Johnson L. How many interviews are enough? An experiment with data saturation and variability. Field Methods 2006;18(1):59-82. https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822X05279903
  17. Kim K-A. The comparison of comprehension survey on drug information leaflets for professionals and patients. M.S. Thesis for Sookmyung Women's University, 2007.
  18. Nam SJ, Yoo H-J. Information on medication and consumer competency. J Consumption Culture 2010;13(1):21-37.
  19. Han H-S. Sources of drug information for self-medication patients. M.S. Thesis for Chung-Ang University, 2000.
  20. Kim Y-S, Park B-H, Lee H-Y. A study on predicting health literacy of Korean elderly using Anderson's health behavior model. J Welfare Adged 2014;65:35-57.
  21. Lee I-H, Lee HW, Je NK, et al. Assessment of readability and appropriate usability based on the product labelling of over-the-counter drugs in Korea. Yakhak Hoeji 2012;56(5):333-45.
  22. National Institute of Korean Language. National survey in basic literacy of Korean. Seoul: National Institute of Korean Language, 2008;81-82.