Journal of Korean society of Dental Hygiene (한국치위생학회지)

Korean Society of Dental Hygiene (한국치위생학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Scanning electron microscopic study on characteristics of tooth surface when using gracey curet and ultrasonic scaler

Gracey curet과 Ultrasonic scaler 사용 시의 치면 특성의 주사현미경적 연구

  • Nam, Yong-Ok (Department of Dental Hygiene, WonKwang Health Science University) ;
  • Lee, Hwa-Jeong (Department of Maxillofacial Tissue Regeneration, Dentistry, Kyung-Hee University) ;
  • Choi, Mi-Hye (Department of Dental Hygiene, Jeonbuk Science College)
  • 남용옥 (원광보건대학교 치위생과) ;
  • 이화정 (경희대학교 치의학전문대학원 악안면재생학교실) ;
  • 최미혜 (전북과학대학교 치위생과)
  • Received : 2016.07.23
  • Accepted : 2016.08.26
  • Published : 2016.08.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Objectives: The purpose of this study is to assess the characteristics of tooth surface after using Gracy curet and Ultrasonic scaler Methods: In this study, 12 teeth extracted were used. 12 specimens were divided into three groups with the same numbers, which were classified into Control group, Gracy curet use group, and Ultrasonic scaler use group, and after performing instrument operation, we measured the roughness and the loss degree of tooth surface by using SEM. Results: In groups using Gracy curet and Ultrasonic scaler, the roughness and the loss of tooth surface increased significantly(p<0.05). In the roughness of groups using Gracy curet and Ultrasonic scaler, Ultrasonic scaler group was higher in crown, but Gracy curet group was higher in root. As a result of observation through SEM, the roughness and the loss degree increased in order of Control group, Ultrasonic scaler use group, and Gracy curet use group. Conclusions: Taken together above results, both hand instrument and ultrasound equipment create roughness and loss in crown and in root, and hand instruments makes rougher than ultrasonic instruments in root, so it is thought to require thorough and accurate technical application not to damage tooth surface when removing plaque.

Keywords

References

  1. Chung SH. A comparison of effectiveness of gracey curet and ultrasonic curet on subgingival scaling and root planning[Master's thesis]. Seoul; Univ. of Dan-Kook, 2000.
  2. Kim YH, Kim JS, Nam YO, Park IS, Song KH, Yang JY. et al. Oral prophylaxis, 4th ed, Seoul: Chung-gu; 2006: 24-5.
  3. Parveen Dahiya P, Kamal R, Gupta R, Pandit N. Comparative evaluation of hand and power-driven instruments on root surface characteristics: A scanning electron microscopy study. Contemp Clin Dent 2011; 2(2): 79-83. http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0976-237X.83065.
  4. Kerry GJ. Roughness of root surfaces after use of ultrasonic instruments and hand curettes. J Periodontal 1967; 38(4): 340-6. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.1967.38.4.340
  5. Caffesse RG, Sweeney PL, Smith BA. Scaling and root planing with or without periodontal flap surgery. J Clin Periodontol 1986; 13(3): 205-10. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.1986.tb01461.x
  6. Greenstein G. Periodontal response to mechanical nonsurgical therapy, A review. J Periodontol 1992; 63(2): 118-30. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.1992.63.2.118
  7. Wylam JM, Mealey BL, Mills MP, Waldrop TC, Moskowicz DC. The clinical effectiveness of open versus closed scaling and root planning on multi-rooted teeth J Periodontol. 1993; 64(11): 1023-8. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.1993.64.11.1023
  8. Kang BW, Ko MH, Koo IY, Kim GW, Kim BN, Kim YK, et al. Medical laws for dental hygienist. 14th ed. Seoul: Komoonsa; 2016: 256.
  9. Nield-Gehrig JS. Fundamentals of periodontal instrumentation. 7th ed. Seoul: DaehanNarae publishing: 2013.
  10. Nam YO. Dental Hygieology, 2nd ed. Seoul: Chung-gu; 2011: 19-20.
  11. Mombelli A. Antibiotecs in periodontal therapy in clinical periodontology and implant dentistry. 3rd ed. Munksgaard; 1998: 1-50.
  12. Corbet EF, Vaughan AJ, Kieser JB. The periodontallyinvolved root surface J Clin Periodontol. 1993; 20(6): 402-10. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.1993.tb00380.x
  13. Jeong MK. Root surface roughness change according to the scaling techniques and fluoride application[Doctoral thesis]. Seoul; Univ. of Dan-Kook, 2012.
  14. Cercek JF, Kiger RD, Garrett S, Egelberg J. Relative effects of plaque control and instrumentation on the clinical parameters of human periodontal desease J Clin Periodontol. 1983; 10(1): 46-56. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.1983.tb01266.x
  15. Garrett JS. Root planing :a perspective. J Periodontol 1977; 48(9): 553-7. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.1977.48.9.553
  16. Won BY, Jang GW, Hwang MY, Jo MS, Kim JS, Nam YO, et al. Oral prophylaxis 6th ed. Seoul: Chung-gu; 2013: 263-4.
  17. Zappa U, Smith B, Sinona C Graf H, Case D, Kim W. Root substance removal by scaling and root planing J Periodontol. 1991; 62(12): 750-4. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.1991.62.12.750
  18. Garnick JJ, Dent J. A scanning electron micrographical study of root surfaces and subgingival bacteria after hand and ultrasonic instrumentation. J Periodontol 1989; 60(8): 441-7. http://dx.doi.org/10.1902/jop.1989.60.8.441.
  19. Schlageter L, Rateitschak-Plu-ss EM, Schwarz JP. Root surface smoothness or roughness following open debridment. An in vivo study. J Clin Periodontol 1996; 23(5): 460-4. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.1996.tb00575.x
  20. Kodher T, Rosin M, Langenbeck N, Berngardt O. Subgingival polishing with a teflon-cated sonic scaler insert in comparison to conventional instruments as assessed on extracted teeth(II). Subgingival roughness J Clin Periodontol 2001; 28(8): 723-9. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-051X.2001.280802.x
  21. Lee HS. Surface roughness of porcelain by the different method of scaling treatment[Master's thesis]. Seoul; Univ. of Dan-Kook, 1996: 15.