Journal of Engineering Education Research (공학교육연구)

Korean Society for Engineering Education (한국공학교육학회)
권호 표지

Cognition of Engineering Students in Team Activities through a Comparative Analysis between Grades

학년 간 비교를 통한 공대생의 팀 활동에 관한 인식 분석

  • Yee, Soung Ryong (Department of Industrial and Management Engineering, Hankuk University of Foreign Studies)
  • 이성룡 (한국외국어대학교 산업경영공학과)
  • Received : 2015.09.04
  • Accepted : 2016.01.08
  • Published : 2016.01.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Team activities in engineering curriculum play the major role in nourishing students with problem-solving and team-working capabilities. Educators endeavor to guide students to achieve success experiences through team activities. The sense of success depends on how the students think and feel about team activities. In this study, we investigated the students thoughts on team activity in various aspects. We provided freshmen and juniors with a set of questionnaire and gathered answers, from which we tried to elicit implication that we may apply for coaching their team activities. The analysis result shows that the perception level of freshmen on team activities is less mature in a sense that the freshmen's view is more neutral than that of juniors. Regardless of the grade, they show that they put more emphasis on the team atmosphere than on the team performance. Especially the freshmen are more sensitive to the relationship between the team members than the juniors. The juniors concern more about whether they prepare well enough for the team activities or not. Both of the grades prefer self-regulation in team formation and think the leadership is essential in performing team activities. However, they both hesitate to take a role as a leader. We expect the research result will provide novel ideas for coaching students to obtain valuable experiences on team activities.

Keywords

References

  1. 강인애.정은실(2010). 팀 구성 방식에 따른 학습활동 만족도: 질적 자료 분석에 의한 사례연구. 교육방법연구, 22(3): 67-95.
  2. 권순각.김성우.박유현(2013). 지속적인 기업체 연계 프로젝트 기반의 캡스톤 설계 운영시스템. 공학교육연구, 16(3): 61-68.
  3. 김영갑(2012). 태권도지도자의 감성적 리더십과 팀 분위기, 선수만족도 및 팀 성과와의 관계. 한국체육학회지, 51(6): 295-305.
  4. 김이형.이병식(2005). 창의적사고능력 증진을 위한 공학설계 입문 교과목 및 사례 개발. 공학교육연구, 8(3): 26-35.
  5. 김정욱.신명진.권성호(2013). 과제상호의존성과 팀 소속기간에 따라 조직분위기가 개인만족에 미치는 영향. 한국스포츠심리학회지, 24(2): 147-160.
  6. 김종욱 외(2009). 공학설계 교과목에서 문제 중심 교수-학습과 프로젝트 중심 교수-학습 전략 비교 분석. 공학교육연구, 12(4): 142-149.
  7. 서원석.이창훈.양나연(2013). 대학생들의 다학제 팀워크를 통한 적정기술 프로젝트 사례연구. 한국기술교육학회지, 13(2): 86-109.
  8. 심영기.김태훈(2014). 기술적 문제 해결 팀 활동에서 팀원의 기술적 문제 해결 성향과 상호작용의 관계 분석. 한국기술교육학회지, 14(1): 49-70.
  9. 안정호.임지영(2008). 종합설계과목의 협동학습에서 셀프 리더십과 팀웍간의 관계. 공학교육연구, 11(4): 109-114.
  10. 이병준(2010). 체육수업에서 팀 구성과 역할 분담에 대한 학생의 경험. 한국스포츠 교육학회지, 17(1): 125-144.
  11. 이성룡(2011). 프로젝트 성공경험 증진을 위한 팀 구성 탐색. 정보산업공학논문집, 17: 121-137.
  12. 이성룡(2013). 팀원 구성에 따른 팀 프로젝트의 성과 분석: 에니어그램의 3중심 성격유형을 통한 접근. 공학교육연구, 16(1): 75-83.
  13. 이성룡(2015). 공대 신입생들의 팀 활동 만족감과 관련 요인에 관한 연구. 디지털융복합연구, 13(2): 315-324. https://doi.org/10.14400/JDC.2015.13.2.315
  14. 이태호.김태훈(2014). Capstone-Design 활동에서 MBTI 성격유형에 따른 팀 상호작용 변화 분석. 공학교육연구, 17(1): 57-64.
  15. 최진호.김일광(2011). 팀 스포츠 선수의 역할 명료성, 역할 만족, 팀 응집력을 통한 선수 만족도. 한국스포츠산업경영학회지, 16(5): 1-15.
  16. Bandura, A.(1977). Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84 : 191-215. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.84.2.191
  17. Bergey, P.K.(2012). Team Formation and Performance. IEEE Engineering Management Review, 40 (1): 2. https://doi.org/10.1109/EMR.2011.2182078
  18. De Dreu, Carsten K.W. & Weingart, L.R.(2003). Task Versus Relationship Conflict, Team Performance, and Team Member Satisfaction: A Meta-Analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88 (4): 741-749. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.4.741
  19. Eden, D.(2001). Mean efficacy: External sources of general and specific subject efficacy. Work motivation in the context of a globalizing economy. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  20. Fung, H.(2014). Relationship among team trust, team cohesion, team satisfaction and project team effectiveness as perceived by project managers in Malaysia. International Journal of Business, Economics and Management, 1 (1): 1-15.
  21. Johnson, T.E, Top E. & Yukselturk, E.(2011). Team shared mental model as a contributing factor to team performance and students' course satisfaction in blended courses. Computers in Human Behavior, 27 (6): 2330-2338. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2011.07.012
  22. Torre-Ruiz, J.M., Ferron-Vilchez, V., & Ortiz-de- Mandojana, N.(2014). Team Decision Making and Individual Satisfaction With the Team. Small Group Research, 45 (2): 198-216. https://doi.org/10.1177/1046496414525478
  23. Zeitun, R.M., Abdulqader, K.S. & Alshare, K.A.(2013). Team Satisfaction and Student Group Performance: A Cross- Cultural Study. Journal of Education for Business, 88 (5): 286-293. https://doi.org/10.1080/08832323.2012.701243