Journal of the Economic Geographical Society of Korea (한국경제지리학회지)

The Economic Geographical Society of Korea (한국경제지리학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

World Trade Network and the Roles of the Industries in the Major Trading Countries

세계무역 네트워크와 주요국 산업의 역할: 부가가치 교역 자료를 이용한 사회연결망 분석 기법을 중심으로

  • Hyun, Kisoon (Korean Geographic Research Institute, Sungshin Women's University) ;
  • Lee, Junyeop (Department of International Trade and Regional Studies, Inha University)
  • 현기순 (성신여자대학교 한국지리연구소) ;
  • 이준엽 (인하대학교 국제통상학과)
  • Received : 2016.11.22
  • Published : 2016.12.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Using Social Network Analysis and Trade in Value Added Database(TiVA), this paper examines the world trade network. Main findings are as follows. Firstly, there are three types of industries, which have dominant status in the world value added trade network. Those are the manufacturing industries in the developing countries such as China's electronics industry, the service industries in the developed countries such as U.S. R&D, and the manufacturing industries in the developed countries such as German motor vehicle industry. Secondly, the major hub industries in the world trade network have their own specific types in the brokerage roles. Most interestingly, U.S. service industries such as the R&D, the logistics industry, and the whole sale and retail industry reveal itinerant and liaison brokerage roles. Thirdly, Korean industries have been dominated by Chinese industries. However, the financial industry and the R&D industry could have revealed superior status as the brokerage role of itinerant. This implies Korean industries could sustain their competitiveness of the hubness status only by openness policy in the service industry.

본 연구에서는 부가가치 무역 데이터를 이용하여 세계무역 네트워크 내의 구조를 분석하였다. 그 주요 결과를 요약하면 다음과 같다. 첫째, 부가가치 무역에 있어서 주요 산업은 다음 세 가지 유형이다. 여기에는 중국 등 개도국의 전자산업, 미국과 영국의 R&D 산업, 독일의 자동차, 화학, 기계 산업 등이 해당된다. 즉, 개도국의 조립형 제조업, 미국 등 선진국의 R&D 산업, 독일과 같은 선진국의 첨단 제조업이 포함된다. 둘째, 주요 산업이 글로벌 허브 산업으로 기능하는 유형은 상이하다. 특히, 미국의 서비스산업인 도소매, 물류, R&D 산업 등은 순회자와 연락자가 매우 강하게 나타나며 그 지위를 지속적으로 유지하고 있다는 것이다. 셋째, 중개자 측면에서 한 중 일 3국 주요 산업을 진단하면 한국의 대부분 산업은 중국과 일본에 압도되고 있다. 그러나 순회자 역할에서 금융산업과 R&D 산업은 중국과 일본보다 각각 우위에 있다. 이러한 점에서 서비스산업의 진일보한 개방정책이 한국 산업의 중개자 역할을 강화할 것으로 전망된다.

Keywords

References

  1. 심승진, 2010, "한.중.일 산업간 가치사슬 네트워크 및 동북아지역차원의 산업클러스터 분석", 동북아경제연구 22(3), pp.1-37.
  2. 정준호.조형제, 2016, "OECD 부가가치 기준 교역자료를 이용한 자동차산업 글로벌 생산 네트워크의 특성 분석", 한국경제지리학회지 19(3), pp.491-511.
  3. 현기순.이준엽, 2016, "경제통합과 농식품 교역의 국가간 네트워크 변화", 한국경제지리학회지 19(1), pp.83-103.
  4. Amador, J. and Cabral, S., 2016, "Networks of value added trade", European Central Bank Working Paper, No. 1931.
  5. Baldwin, R. and Lopez-Gonzalez, J., 2015, "Supply-chain trade: A portrait of global patterns and several testable hypotheses", The World Economy 38(11), pp.1682-1721. https://doi.org/10.1111/twec.12189
  6. Cerina, F., Zhu, Z., Chessa, A. and Riccaboni, M., 2015, "World input-output network", PLoS ONE 10(7), e0134025. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0134025
  7. Contreras, M.G.A. and Fagiolo, G., 2014, "Propagation of economic shocks in input-output networks: A cross-country analysis", Phys Rev. E 90, 062812. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.90.062812
  8. Daudin, G., Rifflart, C. and Schweisguth, D., 2011, "Who produces for whom in the world economy?", Canadian Journal of Ecoomics 44(4), pp. 1409-1538.
  9. De Benedictis, L. and Tajoli, L., 2011, "The world trade network", The World Economy 34(8), pp.1417-1454. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9701.2011.01360.x
  10. Dietzenbacher, E. and van der Linden, J. A., 1997, "Sectoral and spatial linkages in the EC production structure", Journal of Regional Science 37, pp.235-257. https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-4146.00053
  11. Fan, Y., Ren, S., Cai, H. and Cui, X., 2014, "The state's role and position in international trade: A complex network perspective", Economic Modelling 39, pp. 71-81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2014.02.027
  12. Gould, R.V. and Fernandez, R.M., 1989, "Structures of mediation: A formal approach to brokerage in transaction networks", Sociological Methodology 19, pp.89-126. https://doi.org/10.2307/270949
  13. Hummels, D., Ishii, J. and Yi. K-M., 2001, "The nature and growth of vertical specialization in world trade," Journal of International Economics 54(1), pp.75-96. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1996(00)00093-3
  14. Johnson, R. C. and Noguera, G., 2012, "Accounting for intermediates: Production sharing and trade in value added", Journal of International Economics 86, pp.224-236. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jinteco.2011.10.003
  15. Johnson, R.C., 2014, "Five facts about value-added exports and implications for macroeconomics and trade research", Journal of Economic Perspectives 28(2), pp.119-142. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.28.2.119
  16. Los, B., Timmer, M.P. and de Vries, G.J., 2015, "How global are global value chains? A new approach to measure international fragmentation", Journal of regional science 55(1), pp.66-92. https://doi.org/10.1111/jors.12121
  17. Maluck, J. and Donner, R.V., 2015, "A network of networks perspective on global trade", PLoS ONE 10(7), e0133310. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0133310
  18. McNerney, J., Fath, B.D. and Silverberg, G., 2013. "Network structure of inter-industry flows", Physica A 392, pp.6427-6441. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physa.2013.07.063
  19. Newman, M.E.J., 2002, "Assortative mixing in networks", Physical Review Letters 89, 208701. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.89.208701
  20. Serrano, M.A., Boguna, M. and Vespignani, A., 2007, "Patterns of dominant flows in the world trade web", Journal of Economic Interactions and Coordination 2, pp.111-124. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11403-007-0026-y
  21. Stehrer, R., 2012, "Trade in value added and the valued added in trade", WIOD Working Paper 8, pp.1-19.
  22. Sturgeon, T.J, 2013, Global Value Chains and Economic Globalization - Towards a New Measurement Framework, Report to Eurostat.
  23. Sun, X., An, H., Gao, X., Jia, X. and Liu, X., 2016, "Indirect energy flow between industrial sectors in China: A complex network approach", Energy 94, pp.195-205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2015.10.102
  24. Timmer, M.P., Dietzenbacher, E., Los, B., Stehrer, R. and de Vries, G.J., 2015, "All illustrated user guide to the world input-output database: the case of global automotive production", Review of International Economics 23(3), pp.575-605. https://doi.org/10.1111/roie.12178
  25. Zhou, M., Wu, G. and Xu, H., 2016, "Structure and formation of top networks in international trade, 2001-2010," Social Network 44, pp.9-21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socnet.2015.07.006

Cited by

  1. Social Network Perspective on Trade in Value Added: Focused on the Logistics Industry vol.15, pp.2, 2016, https://doi.org/10.24006/jilt.2017.15.2.61
  2. 조선해양플랜트산업 제조업체의 구매·판매 네트워크: 전라남도를 중심으로 vol.20, pp.1, 2016, https://doi.org/10.23841/egsk.2017.20.1.16
  3. 농식품 무역의 글로벌 네트워크와 한국의 위상 vol.20, pp.2, 2016, https://doi.org/10.23841/egsk.2017.20.2.121