DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Value Evaluation Research of the Old-growth and Giant Tree - Focus on Gyeongju Gyerim's Zelkova Serrata -

노거수의 가치 평가 연구 - 경주 계림숲 느티나무를 대상으로 -

  • Son, Hee-Jun (Dept. of Landscape Architecture, Graduate School, Dongguk University) ;
  • Xia, Tian-Tian (Dept. of Landscape Architecture, Graduate School, Dongguk University) ;
  • Kim, Young-Hun (Dept. of Landscape Architecture, Graduate School, Dongguk University) ;
  • Kang, Tai-Ho (Dept. of Landscape Architecture, Dongguk University Gyeongju Campus)
  • 손희준 (동국대학교 대학원 조경학과) ;
  • 하첨첨 (동국대학교 대학원 조경학과) ;
  • 김영훈 (동국대학교 대학원 조경학과) ;
  • 강태호 (동국대학교 경주캠퍼스 조경학과)
  • Received : 2016.11.03
  • Accepted : 2016.12.20
  • Published : 2016.12.19

Abstract

Old-growth and giant tree is a nonrenewable resource with great value. The purpose of this study is to provide scientific and reasonable evaluations for the preservation and management of the old-growth and giant tree. Until now the research of old-growth and giant tree's value evaluation and authoritative index is so insufficient and imperfection. Combining with the particularity of the old-growth and giant tree, this study analyzed the main value factors of the old-growth and giant tree and objectively selected the evaluation indicators. According to the actual situation value appraisal model of the old-growth and giant tree was builded. The main value factors can be divided into economic value, cultural history, growing place, tree state, tree form, tree vigor, protection level, growth environment, tree species, tree canopy, and so on. The evaluate indicators can be selected and the indicators' weight can be calculate using analytic hierarchy process methods(AHP). Based on economic value and indicators' weight, tree's total value can be revealed. After calculation and analysis, Gyeongju Gyerim Zelkova serrata's value evaluation results is 491,503,300 won. The research results of this study can provide scientific basis and reference to the old-growth and giant trees' value appraisal and loss compensation, and arouse people's environmental awareness.

노거수는 높은 가치를 지니고 있는 재생불능자원이므로 과학적이고 합리적인 가치 평가는 노거수의 보존관리에 있어 매우 중요하다. 그러나 현재 노거수의 가치 평가에 관한 연구와 권위 있는 평가 지표는 매우 부족한 실정이다. 본 연구는 노거수의 특수성을 감안한 가치 요인을 분석하여 합리적인 평가 지표를 선정하고 현실 적용 가능한 가치 평가 모형을 구축하는데 목적이 있다. 노거수의 평가 지표는 경제가치, 과학연구가치, 생태가치, 경관가치, 사회공익가치로 구분된다. 노거수의 가치에 대한 중요 인자는 인문역사, 성장장소, 수목상태, 수형, 수세, 수종, 수관, 보호등급, 성장환경 등 이다. 계층분석법(AHP)을 이용하여 가치 평가 산식을 작성하고 경주의 세계문화유산인 계림숲 내에 위치한 느티나무의 가치 평가를 실시하였다. 느티나무의 가치는 평가결과 491,503,300원으로 추정된다. 연구 결과는 노거수의 가치 감정과 손실 보상에 중요한 자료가 되며 노거수에 대한 보호 의식을 향상시킬 수 있다.

Keywords

References

  1. Kang, K. R. (2012). A Survey on the Forest Cultural Assets in the Southern Coastal Areas for the Designation and Maintenance of Law-protected Trees. Journal of Korean Institute of Traditional Landscape Architecture. 30(2): 28-36.
  2. Jung, K., Seo, J. Y. and Lee, J. K. (2009). A Study on the Analysis of Growth of Ginkgo and Pine Trees for Environmental Circumstance Improvement for Old Big Trees-Focused on Precious Natural Treasures and the Designated as Treasures by Cities and Counties. Journal of Korean Institute of Traditional Landscape Architecture. 27(1): 57-65.
  3. Sim, W. K. and Shin, S. K. (1992). Status of Maintenance and Protection Strategies of the Law-Protected Trees in Korea. Journal of Korean Institute of Traditional Landscape Architecture. 10(2): 61-90.
  4. Kang, H. C., Lee, J. H., Lee, G. S. and Sagong, Y. B. (2002). An Evaluation of the Vitality and Environmental of Old Trees on the Rural Area in Jinju. Journal of Korean Institute of Traditional Landscape Architecture. 20(4): 27-36.
  5. Son, J. G., Sin, J. H., An, P. G. and Kang, B. H. (2011). The Study on the Image Evaluation of a Preserved Tree as Growth Environment-Focused on the Zelkova serrata in Yesangun-. Rural Planning. 17(2): 33-41. https://doi.org/10.7851/ksrp.2011.17.2.033
  6. Im, H. S. and Sim, W. K. (2005). Cultural Landscape Values and Landscape Use of the Old and Large Trees in Korea-Focusing on the Old and Large Trees designated as the Natural Monument-. Journal of Korean Institute of Traditional Landscape Architecture. 23(1): 94-101.
  7. Un, Y. H. and Ju, J. H. (2010). Assessment of Growth Conditions and Maintenance of Law-Protected Trees in Je-cheon City. Journal of Korean Institute of Traditional Landscape Architecture. 28(2): 67-74.
  8. Kang, B. G. (2014). (The)assessment of tree risk of Mulgun-ri forest (Monument No. 150) of Namhae in Korea.
  9. You, J. H., Pank, G. H. and Lee, Y. H. (2011). Diagnosis of Real Condition and Distribution of Protected Trees in Changwon-si Korea. Journal of Korean Institute of Traditional Landscape Architecture. 29(1): 59-70.
  10. Shen, Q. C. (2005). Loss compensation value evaluation for old and precious trees. China's asset assessment, 2005(11): 45-47.
  11. Beijing quality supervision bureau(2007). Code for evaluation of ancient and famous woody plants. DB11/T478-2007.
  12. Bernatzky, A. (1987) Tree ecology and preservation. Elsevier Scientific Publ. Co., 357pp
  13. Saaty, T. (2007) The Fundamentals of Decision Making and Priority Theory with the Analytic Hierarchy Process, Pittsburgh: RWS Publications.
  14. Mo, S. W. and Kim, C. B. (2012). A Relative Importance Evaluation of the Industrial Sector According to the FTA Using AHP and Fuzzy AHP. Journal of Industrial Economics and Business. 25(2): 1827-1842.
  15. Xu, W. (2005). Discuss to value evaluation criteria. Proceedings of the South China University of Tropical Agriculture, 11(1): 66-69.
  16. Tian, L. Y., Chen S. H. and Zhao. L. (2010). A study on the quality assessment criterion for old and precious trees. Hebei Journal of Forestry and Orchard Research. 25(1): 100-105.