• Journal of the Korean Society for information Management
• /
• v.20 no.1
• /
• pp.401-416
• /
• 2003

This study examined weight techniques for applying to DB evaluation This study, then analyzed DB evaluation criteria in terms of category, content, and business model. Finally, it showed the use example of AHP technique to rank the important evaluation factors. These results will be used to evaluate factors which we significant in determining how well the given DB is appropriate in your environment.

• Proceedings of the Korea Water Resources Association Conference
• /
• 2006.05a
• /
• pp.2001-2005
• /
• 2006

우리나라는 매년 집중호우로 인한 산사태로 인해 인적, 물질적 피해를 일으킨다. 반복적인 산사태의 피해를 방지 하기위해서는 산사태 예측 시스템이 필요하다. 본 연구에서는 안성시를 대상으로 GIS와 RS 자료를 활용하여 산사태 위험지를 분석하고자 Logistic 회귀분석 방법과 AHP 기법을 이용하였다. Logistic 회귀분석과 AHP 기법에는 6개의 인자(경사, 경사향, 고도, 토양배수, 토심, 토지이용)를 사용하여, 7등급으로 산사태 위험도를 분류하였다. Logistic 회귀분석 방법과 AHP 기법을 이용한 산사태 위험지도를 표본 자료와 비교하면 산사태가 발생한 표본에서 산사태 위험성이 높은(1-2등급)지역이 Logistic 회귀분석에서는 46.1% AHP 기법은 48.7%로 분류되어 AHP 기법이 분류도가 높다고 분석 되었다. 하지만 Logistic 회귀분석과 AHP 기법은 서로 분석 과정의 차이를 가지고 있기 때문에 Logistic 회귀분석과 AHP기법을 적용한 결과에 동일 가중치를 부여한 후 7개 등급으로 재분류(reclass)하여 산사태 위험지역을 추출 할 수 있는 방법론을 제시하였다. 그 결과 산사태가 발생한 표본에서 1-2등급지역이 58.9%로 분석되어 분류정확도를 높일 수 있었다.

• KSCE Journal of Civil and Environmental Engineering Research
• /
• v.26 no.5D
• /
• pp.861-867
• /
• 2006

The objective of this study is to analyze the landslide hazard areas by combining LRA (Lgistic Regression Analysis) and AHP (Analytic Hierarchy Program) methods with Remote Sensing and GIS data in Anseong-si. In order to classify landslide hazard areas of seven levels, six topographic factors (slope, aspect, elevation, soil drain, soil depth, and land use) were used as input factors of LRA and AHP methods. As results, high-risk areas for landslide (1 and 2 levels) by LRA and AHP of its own were classified as 46.1% and 48.7%, respectively. A new method by applying weighting factors to the results of LRA and AHP was suggested. High-risk areas for landslide (1 and 2 levels) form the new method was classified as 58.9%.

• KSCE Journal of Civil and Environmental Engineering Research
• /
• v.26 no.4D
• /
• pp.695-702
• /
• 2006

In GIS-based Spatial Decision-making Support System (SDSS), the Boolean logic by conventional simple overlay method contains two problems. One is losing lots of information in analysis process, the other is unable to reflect of weighting values between evaluated items. Therefore, evaluation system as Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) needs to improve these problems effectively. The purpose of this study is to provide the benefit of AHP method and GIS spatial analysis in site analysis for crop cultivation. First, the weighting value of AHP for topography, distribution grade of water, property of soil and slope items are evaluated throughout survey to experts of soil, crop and agricultural management fields. On the basis of these weighting value of AHP by items, site suitability analysis for black raspberry cultivation is performed. To estimate the benefit of AHP method, the current cultivating map of black raspberry is constructed in Ssangchi-myeon district. In comparison with site analysis of Boolean logic, site analysis of AHP method shows more realistic.

• Proceedings of the Korea Society for Industrial Systems Conference
• /
• 2009.05a
• /
• pp.114-119
• /
• 2009

본 논문에서는 수량화 방법과 AHP(Analytic Hierarchy Process) 기법을 사용하여 산사태 발생에 대한 통계적 예측모형을 구축하는데 목적이 있다. 수량화(Quantification) 방법은 질적변수에 수량을 부여하는 통계적 방법으로, 기 조사된 자료에 기반하여 분석을 수행하는 방법이다. 본 논문에서는 서구의 다변량분석 기법인 정준상관분석의 결과를 토대로 수량화 과정을 구체적으로 제안한다. 데이터에 기반한 수량화 방법과는 달리 AHP(Analytic Hierarchy Process) 기법은 일종의 다기준 의사결정을 위해 사용되는 기법으로, 설문자료에 기반한 분석법이다. 실제자료에 대한 분석으로 산사태 발생여부를 측정한 자료(한국지질자원연구원 제공)와 전문가 설문을 통해 수집된 자료를 이용하였다. 이들 자료에 대해 수량화 분석과 AHP분석을 통해 산사태 발생여부를 예측할 수 있는 두 종류의 평가표와 함께 로지스틱 회귀를 통한 통계적 예측모형을 개발하였으며, 두 모형간의 성능비교와 안정성 평가를 수행하였다.

• Journal of Advanced Marine Engineering and Technology
• /
• v.22 no.3
• /
• pp.381-395
• /
• 1998

The purpose of this study is to determine the optimal gas turbine system for special purpose ships. First we generate critical evaluation criteria an construct their hierarchical structure. The criteria consist of qualitative ones as well as the economic factor. Then AHP is applied to solve the decision making problem AHP gibes good results different from those only by the economic evaluation methods. And during the analysis, the procedure produces many useful informations to the decision making. The results shows that AHP is an appropriate method for these kinds of problems such as the system selection.

• Proceedings of the KAIS Fall Conference
• /
• 2012.05a
• /
• pp.419-422
• /
• 2012

본 연구는 기술개발지원사업의 선정 평가지표를 개발하고, 사례에 적용하여 그 타당성을 파악하고 있다. 개발된 선정평가지표의 기업선정순위와 기존 선정평가지표의 기업선정순위를 비교하여 성과를 낸 기업의 순위를 어떤 선정평가지표가 더 정확히 유추해 냈는지를 확인하고 있다. BSC 및 AHP기법을 이용하여 기술개발지원사업 선정평가지표를 개발하였다.

• Korean Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
• /
• v.4 no.1 s.13
• /
• pp.81-89
• /
• 2003

This research suggests the FD-AHP decision making model for Construction Projects which is composed of two main method to prevent a ranking invert situation ; First, to make the consensus of the experts consistent, we utilize Fuzzy-Delphi method to adjust the fuzzy rating of every expert to achive the consensus condition with the fuzzy linguistic presentation. Second, to handle vague linguistic presentation caused by expert's experiences and subjective judgement, we propose Fuzzy-AHP which is able to enhance precision of construction projects decision mating situation. Moreover, with the correlation analysis, we show that the validity of the FD-AHP model under a decision making task specially on where highly demanded expert's experiences and intuition.

• Journal of architectural history
• /
• v.23 no.4
• /
• pp.19-33
• /
• 2014

Recently, conservation and utilization of cultural heritage has been regarded as importance. So, various research papers about maintenance of the remains have been presented in many conferences. But most of researches have focused on introduction about maintenance methods and explanation about maintenance concepts of remains. And even in case of a few papers treated post-evaluation about maintenance of the remains the criteria of the evaluation has tended to somewhat subjective. So, the purpose of this study is to show the objective post-evaluation indexes which was developed by Delphi AHP methods. This research was proceeded in two stages. First, we arranged the evaluation index in a hierarchy to be made through the analyses about references and researches about maintenance of remains. 304 evaluation articles were elicited through the process. And then, elicited evaluation articles were classified with 'conservation' and 'utilization'. Second step was to figure out importance and validity of hierarchical evaluation articles with twice questionnaire surveys. This research used interval scale to comprehend validity and AHP method to evaluate relative importance of each other articles.

• Journal of the Korean Society of Surveying, Geodesy, Photogrammetry and Cartography
• /
• v.20 no.2
• /
• pp.199-206
• /
• 2002

The application of GSIS for most route determination is provided by selecting several basic data such as land use, land construction quantity and land price, and then establishing a database to analyze for the route determination. However, this strategy rarely considers the complicated multi-factors that are essential for route determination. To solve this problem, it is required to use the GSIS and attempt to support the decision of majority for optimum route determination and standardize the route determination procedure. Accordingly, in this study, the qualification of multi-factors was attempted using the AHP technique, and so the data for the route determination was provided effectively, which resulted in the optimum route determination. As a result of applying the AHP technique, optimum routes were selected more rationally than randomly applying the values of multi-factors as before.