References
- 교육부(2015). 2015 개정 교육과정 보도자료, http://www.moe.go.kr/web/100063/ko/board/view.do?bbsId=316&boardSeq=62381&mode=view에서 인용.
- 유진상. 핵심은 코딩 스킬이 아니라 '컴퓨팅적 사고' 능력. http://it.chosun.com/news/article.html?no=2820617에서 인용.
- 김자미.이원규 (2010). 교과교육의 측면에서 본 정보교과의 정체성에 대한 고찰. 정보교육학회논문지, 14(2), 219-227.
- 최정원.이은경.김경훈.이영준 (2015). 2015 개정 정보 교과 교육과정에서 학습자의 컴퓨팅 사고력 평가 방안에 대한 제언. 2015년 한국컴퓨터교육학회 하계 학술발표논문지 19(2).
- Wing, J. M. (2006). Computational thinking. Communications of the ACM, 49(3), 33-35. https://doi.org/10.1145/1118178.1118215
- Kramer, J. (2007), Is Abstraction the Key to Computing? Communications of the ACM, 50(4), 37-41.
- 배영권(2007). 성별의 차이를 고려한 로봇프로그래밍 교수전략에 관한 연구. 컴퓨터교육학회논문지. 14(1), 27-37.
- Beyer, S., Rynes, K., Perrault, J., Hay, K., Haller, S. (2003). Gender Differences in Computer Science Students. SIGCSE '03 Proceedings of the 34th SIGCSE technical symposium on Computer science education, 35(1), 49-53.
- 박성규.박재용(1998). 컴퓨터 프로그래밍 언어의 활용수준에 대한 성별 차이분석. 성평등연구, 2, 47-68.
- 송정범.백성혜.이태욱(2009). 성별의 차이를 고려한 로봇 프로그래밍 학습이 여중학생의 몰입 수준과 문제해결력에 미치는 효과. 컴퓨터교육학회논문지, 12(1), 45-55.
- 신승기.최익선.배영권(2015). MadewithCode를 활용한 여학생의 소프트웨어 교육 방안 탐색, 한국지식정보기술학회 논문지, 10(1), 121-136.
- 심재권.김현철.이원규(2015). 2015 개정정보 교육과정에 따른 피지컬 컴퓨팅을 활용한 정보교육에서 성별에 따른 태도와 성취도 차이분석. 컴퓨터교육학회논문지, 19(4), 1-9.
- 유병건.김자미.이원규(2012). 성별에 따른 프로그래밍 성취도와 문제해결과정의 관계 분석. 컴퓨터교육학회논문지, 10(4), 27-37.
- Vallacher, R. R. and Wegner, D. M. (1989). Levels of personal agency : Individual variation in action identification. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57(4), 660-671. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.57.4.660
- http://scholar.google.co.kr/scholar?hl=ko&q=gender+difference&btnG=&lr=에서 인용.
- Johns, M., Schmader, T., & Martens, A. (2005). Knowing is half the battle teaching stereotype threat as a means of improving women's math performance. Psychological Science, 16(3), 175-179. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0956-7976.2005.00799.x
- Burgoon, E. M., Henderson, M. D., & Markman, A. B. (2013). There are many ways to see the forest for the trees : A tour guide for abstraction. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 8(5), 501-520. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691613497964
- Navon, D. (1977). Forest before trees: The precedence of global features in visual perception. Cognitive Psychology, 9, 353-383. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(77)90012-3
- Vallacher, R. R. & Wegner, D. M. (1987). What do people think they're doing? Action identification and human behavior. Psychological Review, 94(1), 3-15. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.94.1.3
- 박찬정, 현정석, 진희란, 정혜선(2015). C 와 스크래치 프로그램 이해에 대한 고등학생의 추상적 사고, 언어친밀성, 학업성취도 관계 분석. 컴퓨터교육학회논문지, 18(6), 1-12.
- Watson, A. H., McCabe, T. J., & Wallace, D. R. (1996). Structured testing: A testing methodology using the cyclomatic complexity metric. NIST special Publication, 500(235), 1-114.
- Singer, M. (2007). Modelling both complexity and abstraction: A paradox?. In Modelling and applications in mathematics education. Springer US, 233-240.
- Zhu, Z. (2007). Gender differences in mathematical problem solving Patterns: A review of literature. International Education Journal, 8(2), 187-203.
- Geist, E. A., & King, M. (2008). Different, not better: Gender differences in mathematics learning and achievement. Journal of Instructional Psychology, 35(1), 43-53.
- Pease, A., & Pease, B. (2004). Why men don't listen and women can't read maps: How we're different and what to do about it. Harmony, 37-39.
- Chiappetta, E. L. (1976). A review of Piagetian studies relevant to science instruction at the secondary and college level. Science Education, 60(2), 253-261. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.3730600215
- Darwish, A. H., Rundgren, S. N. C., Yao, B. J., Fadzil, H. M., Saat, R. M., Cibik, A. S., & Lau, K. C. (2014). The abstract thinking levels of the science-education students in Gaza universities. In Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching, 15(2), n2-n2.
- Forster, J., Friedman, R. S., & Liberman, N. (2004). Temporal construal effects on abstract and concrete thinking: Consequences for insight and creative cognition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87(2), 177. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.87.2.177
- Trope, Y. & Liberman, N. (2003). Temporal construal. Psychological Review, 110(3), 403-421. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.110.3.403
- Trope, Y. & Liberman, N. (2010). Construal-level theory of psychological distance. Psychological Review, 117(2), 440-463. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0018963