PNF and Movement

  • 제13권1호
  • /
  • Pages.17-23
  • /
  • 2015
  • /
  • 2508-6227(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2508-6472(eISSN)
대한고유수용성신경근촉진법학회 (Korea Proprioceptive Neuromuscular Facilitation Association)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

일반 성인의 작업과 활동의 중재 형태에 대한 행위 관찰 시 거울신경세포 시스템의 EEG 활성도 차이

Differences of EEG Activation in Mirror Neuron System during Action Observation for Occupation-based, Purposeful Activity, Preparatory Method in adult subjects

  • 고효은 (동신대학교 작업치료학과) ;
  • 윤태원 (씨티재활의학과 요양병원 재활센터) ;
  • 정현애 (동신대학교 작업치료학과)
  • Ko, Hyo-Eun (Department of Occupational Therapy, Dong-shin University) ;
  • Yun, Tae-Won (Rehabilitation center, Gwangju City Rehabilitation Hospital) ;
  • Chung, Hyun-Ae (Department of Occupational Therapy, Dong-shin University)
  • 투고 : 2014.11.26
  • 심사 : 2015.03.02
  • 발행 : 2015.03.31
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

Purpose: This study aims to identify changes in the mirror neuron system in normal people through mu rhythm during action observation of occupation-based intervention, purposeful activity and prepare a method of intervention form of occupation using occupation and activity. Methods: TThis study aims to identify changes in the mirror neuron system in normal people through mu rhythm during action observation of occupation-based intervention, purposeful activity and prepare a method of intervention form of occupation using occupation and activity. The activation of the mirror neuron system was compaired among 3 condition by oneway ANOVA. Results: The result of analysis showed mu suppression in all conditions. Although all conditions showed mu suppression, there was no significant difference among the conditions. Conclusion: The results suggest that the mirror neuron system is activated during action observation to be able to occupational therapy but the mirror neuron system is not separately activated among the conditions.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Buccino G, Lui F, Canessa N, et al. Neural circuits involvedin the recognition of actions performed bynonconspecifics: An fMRI study. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience. 2004;16(1):114-126. https://doi.org/10.1162/089892904322755601
  2. Buccino G, Solodkin A, Small SL. Functions of the mirror neuron system: implications for neurorehabilitation. Cognitive and behavioral neurology. 2006;19(1):55-63. https://doi.org/10.1097/00146965-200603000-00007
  3. Calvo-Merino B, Glaser DE, Grezes J, et al. Action observation and acquired motor skills: an FMRI study with expert dancers. Cerebral cortex. 2005;15(8):1243-1249. https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhi007
  4. Cheng Y, Meltzoff AN, Decety J. Motivation modulates the activity of the human mirror-neuron system. Cerebral Cortex. 2007;17(8):1979-1986. https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhl107
  5. Dobkin BH. Training and exercise to drive poststroke recovery. Nature clinical practice neurology, 4(2); 76-85, 2008. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncpneuro0709
  6. Ertelt D, Small S, Solodkin A, et al. Action observation has a positive impact on rehabilitation of motor deficits after stroke. Neuroimage. 2007:36:T164-T173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.03.043
  7. Gallese V, Fadiga L, Fogassi L, et al. Action recognition in the premotor cortex. Brain. 1996;119(2):593-609. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/119.2.593
  8. Haslinger B, Erhard P, Altenmuller E, et al. Transmodal sensorimotor networks during action observation in professional pianists. Journal of cognitive neuroscience. 2005;17(2):282-293. https://doi.org/10.1162/0898929053124893
  9. Iacoboni M, Molnar-Szakacs I, Gallese V, et al. Grasping the intentions of others with one's own mirror neuron system. PLoS biology. 2005;3(3):529-535.
  10. Luke C, Dodd KJ, Brock K. Outcomes of the Bobath concept on upper limb recovery following stroke. Clinical Rehabilitation. 2004;18(8):888-898. https://doi.org/10.1191/0269215504cr793oa
  11. Merians AS, Jack D, Boian R, et al. Virtual reality-augmented rehabilitation for patients following stroke. Physical therapy. 2002;82(9):898-915.
  12. Nishitani N, Hari R. Temporal dynamics of cortical representation for action. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2000;97(2):913-918. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.97.2.913
  13. Oberman LM, Hubbard EM, McCleery JP, et al. EEG evidencefor mirror neuron dysfunction in autism spectrum disorders. Cognitive Brain Research. 2005;24(2):190-198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogbrainres.2005.01.014
  14. Pedretti LW, Early MB. Occupational Therapy: Practice Skills for Physical Dysfunction. 5th ed. Philadelphia. Mosby. 2001.
  15. Perry A, Bentin S. Mirror activity in the human brain while observing hand movements: A comparison between EEG desynchronization in the${\mu}-range$ and previous fMRI results. Brain research. 2009;1282:126-132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainres.2009.05.059
  16. Petrosini L, Graziano A, Mandolesi L, et al. Watch how todo it! New advances in learning by observation. Brain research reviews. 2003;42(3):252-264. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-0173(03)00176-0
  17. Rizzolatti G, Fadiga L, Gallese V, et al. Premotor cortex andthe recognition of motor actions. Cognitive brain research. 1996;3(2):131-141. https://doi.org/10.1016/0926-6410(95)00038-0
  18. Roley S, DeLany J, Barrows C, et al. Occupational therapy practice framework: Domain & practice. The American journal of occupational therapy.: official publication of the American Occupational Therapy Association. 2008;62(6): 625. https://doi.org/10.5014/ajot.62.6.625
  19. Schmidt RA, Lee TD. Motor Control and Learning-A Behavioral Emphasis. 4th ed. California. Human Kinetics. 2005.
  20. Shumway-Cook A, Woollacott MH. Motor Control: Translating Research Into Clinical Practice. Third ed. Philadelphia. Lippincott Williams&Wilkins. 2007.
  21. Trombly CA, Ma H. A synthesis of the effects of occupation altherapy for persons with stroke, Part I: Restoration of roles, tasks, and activities. The American journal of occupational therapy. 2002;56(3):250-259. https://doi.org/10.5014/ajot.56.3.250