Korean Journal of Poultry Science (한국가금학회지)

The Korean Society of Poultry Science (한국가금학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Comparison of Ileal and Fecal Digestibility of Canola Meal and Wheat Bran in Ducks

채종박과 밀기울에 대한 오리의 분과 회장 소화율 비교

  • Kim, Ji-Hyuk (Poultry Science Division, National Institute of Animal Science, RDA) ;
  • Kang, Hwan-Gu (Poultry Science Division, National Institute of Animal Science, RDA) ;
  • Bang, Han-Tae (Poultry Science Division, National Institute of Animal Science, RDA) ;
  • Hwangbo, Jong (Poultry Science Division, National Institute of Animal Science, RDA) ;
  • Choi, Hee-Cheol (Poultry Science Division, National Institute of Animal Science, RDA) ;
  • Kim, Dong-Wook (Poultry Science Division, National Institute of Animal Science, RDA) ;
  • Hong, Eui-Chul (Poultry Science Division, National Institute of Animal Science, RDA)
  • 김지혁 (농촌진흥청 국립축산과학원 가금과) ;
  • 강환구 (농촌진흥청 국립축산과학원 가금과) ;
  • 방한태 (농촌진흥청 국립축산과학원 가금과) ;
  • 황보종 (농촌진흥청 국립축산과학원 가금과) ;
  • 최희철 (농촌진흥청 국립축산과학원 가금과) ;
  • 김동욱 (농촌진흥청 국립축산과학원 가금과) ;
  • 홍의철 (농촌진흥청 국립축산과학원 가금과)
  • Received : 2015.02.12
  • Accepted : 2015.03.09
  • Published : 2015.03.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

This work was carried out to evaluate the feces and ileal digestibility of canola meal and wheat bran in ducks. Ninety Pekin ducks (6-week-old, average 3.4 kg) were divided into three treatments (6 replications/treatment, 5 birds/replication) by feedstuffs (basal diet, canola meal, and wheat bran) and were fed on these diets in individual metabolic cages for one week. After one week, the samples for analysis were collected from feces and ileum. On comparison of treatments and collected sites, the feces digestibility of basal diet was the highest among treatments on chemical compositions except crude protein and crude fat and ileal digestibility of canola meal was the lowest (P<0.01). On comparison of treatments, the digestibility of basal diet was higher and that of wheat bran was lower when compared to other treatments (P<0.05). The feces digestibility was lower than the ileal digestibility in crude protein (P<0.05) and crude fat (P<0.01). The digestibility of amino acid was the highest at feces of control group among treatments (P<0.01). No significant difference was detected in terms of digestibility of isoleucine, leucine and phenylalanine among essential amino acids, and alanine, glycine and tyrosine among non-essential amino acids between control and wheat bran, and wheat bran and canola meal. However amino acid digestibility was higher in control group when compared to canola meal group (P<0.05). Other amino acid digestibilities were not significantly differ by treatments. These results may provide the basic data on amino acid digestibility of ducks to evaluate feedstuffs and to formulate optimum diet for commercial Pekin duck.

본 시험은 밀기울과 채종박에 대한 육용오리(Pekin종, 평균체중 3.4 kg)의 소화율을 평가하기 위해 수행하였다. 6주령 육용오리 90수를 선별하여 대사케이지에서 1주간 사육하며 소화시험을 수행하였고, 시험사료는 밀기울과 채종박을 이용하였다. 시험설계는 사료원료에 따른 3처리구, 처리구당 6반복, 반복당 5수씩을 완전임의 배치하여 시험을 수행하였으며, 시험이 끝난 후 분과 회장에서 소화율 측정용 시료를 채취하였다. 처리구와 시료 채취 부위에 따른 일반성분의 소화율은 조단백질과 조지방을 제외한 성분들에서 기초사료의 분 소화율이 가장 높았으며, 채종박의 회장 소화율이 낮게 나타났다(P<0.01). 처리구 간 비교에서 기초 사료의 소화율이 가장 높았고, 밀기울의 소화율이 가장 낮았다(P<0.05). 분과 회장 소화율의 비교에서도 조단백질과 조지방에서는 회장 소화율이 분의 소화율보다 높게 나타났다(P<0.05, P<0.01). 처리구와 시료 채취 부위에 따른 아미노산의 소화율은 기초사료의 분 소화율이 가장 높았으며, 채종박의 회장 소화율이 가장 낮게 나타났다(P<0.01). 처리구간 비교에서는 필수 아미노산 중 iso-leucine, leucine 및 phenylalanine, 비필수 아미노산 중 alanine, glycine 및 tyrosine은 대조구와 밀기울 급여구, 밀기울과 채종박 급여구 사이에서는 유의적인 차이가 없었다. 그러나 이들 아미노산의 소화율은 대조구가 채종박 급여구에 비해 높았다(P<0.05). 다른 아미노산들은 처리구에 따른 유의적인 차이를 보이지 않았다. 본 연구를 통해 오리에 의한 밀기울과 채종박의 소화율에 대한 정보를 제시하였으며, 도출된 결과들은 오리 사료의 최적 배합을 위한 기초자료로 활용될 수 있다.

Keywords

References

  1. Adedokun SA, Parsons CM, Lilburn O, Adeola O, Applegate TJ 2007 Endogenous amino acid flow in broiler chicks is affected by the age of birds and method of estimation. Poult Sci 86:2590-2597. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.2007-00096
  2. Adeola O 2005 Metabolisable energy and amino acid digestibility of high-oil maize, low-phytate maize and low phytase soybean meal for White Pekin ducks. Br Poult Sci 46:607-614. https://doi.org/10.1080/00071660500256123
  3. An EM, Lee JK, Choi YS, Kim YH, Shin HS 2014 Physicochemical properties of wheat bran in different areas prepared by a high-pressure homogenizer process. Kor J Food Sci Technol 46:404-409. https://doi.org/10.9721/KJFST.2014.46.4.404
  4. AOAC 2012 Official Method of Analysis. 19th ed. Association of Official Analytical Chemists. Washington DC, USA. p. 1-43.
  5. Bandegan A, Kiarie E, Payne RL, Crow GH, Guenter W, Nyachoti CM 2010 Standardized ileal amino acid digestibility in dry-extruded expelled soybean meal, extruded canola seed-pea, feather meal, and poultry by-product meal for broiler chickens. Poult Sci 89:2626-2633. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.2010-00757
  6. Bass EJ 1998 Wheat flour milling. Vol II Pages 1-56. In: Wheat Chemistry and Technology. AACC St Paul, MN, USA.
  7. Canola Council of Canada-CCC 2009 Canola meal: Feed Industry Guide. 4th ed. (Canada, Canadian International Grains Institute). Available: http://www.canolacouncil.org
  8. Elleuch M, Bedigian D, Roiseux O, Besbes S, Blecker C, Attia H 2011 Dietary fibre and fibre-rich by-products of food processing: Characterisation, technological functionality and commercial applications: A review. Food Chem 124:411-421. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2010.06.077
  9. Duncan DB 1995 Multiple range and multiple F tests. Biometrics 11:1-42.
  10. Gong LM, Li DF, Wang FL, Huang DS 2003 The effect of the ratio of threonine to lysine on performance, carcass quality, nutrient digestibility and plasma biochemistry in dexes in broilers. Pages 52-63 in Proc 2003 Studies on Animal Nutrition and Metabolism. Beijing Agriculture Press, Beijing, China.
  11. Gopinger E, Xavier EG, Lemes JS, Moraes PO, Elias MC, Roll VFB 2014 Carcass yield and meat quality in broiler fed with canola meal. Bri Poult Sci 55:817-823. https://doi.org/10.1080/00071668.2014.980394
  12. Hong D, Burrows H, Adeola O 2002 Addition of enzyme to starter and grower diets for ducks. Poult Sci 81:1842-1849. https://doi.org/10.1093/ps/81.12.1842
  13. Huang KH, Ravindran V, Li X, Bryden WL 2005 Influence of age on the apparent ileal amino acid digestibility of feed ingredients for broiler chickens. Br Poult Sci 46:235-245.
  14. Jamroz D, Jakobsen K, Orda J, Skorupinska J, Wiliczkiewicz A 2001 Development of the gastrointestinal tract and digestibility of dietary fibre and amino acids in young chickens, ducks and geese fed diets with high amount of barley. Comp Biochem Physiol A Mol Integr Physiol 130:643-652. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1095-6433(01)00386-5
  15. Jarmoz D, Wiliczkiewicz A, Orda J, Wertelecki T, Skorupinska J 2002 Aspects of development of digestive activity of intestine in young chickens, ducks and geese. J Anim Physiol Anim Nutr (Berl) 86:353-366. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1439-0396.2002.00388.x
  16. Kadim IT, Moughan PJ, Ravindran V 2002 Ileal amino acid digestibility assay for the growing meat chicken-comparison of ileal and excreta amino acid digestibility in the chicken. Br Poult Sci 44:588-597.
  17. Kluth H, Rodehutscord M 2006 Comparison of amino acid digestibility in broiler chickens, turkeys, and Pekin ducks. Poult Sci 85:1953-1960. https://doi.org/10.1093/ps/85.11.1953
  18. Kong C, Adeola O 2010 Apparent ileal digestibility of amino acids in feedstuffs for White Pekin ducks. Poult Sci 89: 545-550. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.2009-00485
  19. Korean Feeding Standard for Poultry 2007 National Institute of Animal Science, RDA, Korea.
  20. Mason VC 1984 Metabolism of nitrogen compound in the large gut (Emphasis on recent findings in the sheep and pig). Proc Nutr Soc 43:45-53. https://doi.org/10.1079/PNS19840026
  21. McNeill L, Bernard K, MacLeod MG 2004 Food intake, growth rate, food conversion and food choice in broilers fed on diets high in rapeseed meal and pea meal, with observations on sensory evaluation of the resulting poultry meat. Br Poult Sci 45:519-523. https://doi.org/10.1080/00071660412331286235
  22. Ravindran V, Hew LI, Ravindran G, Bryden WL 1999 A comparison of ileal digesta and excreta analysis for the determination of amino acid digestibility in food ingredients for poultry. Br Poult Sci 40:266-274. https://doi.org/10.1080/00071669987692
  23. Ravindran V, Hew LI, Ravindran G, Bryden WL 2005 Apparent ileal digestibility of amino acids in dietary ingredients for broiler chickens. Anim Sci 81:85-97.
  24. SAS 2012 Statistical Analysis System Proprietary Software Release 9.2. SAS Inst Inc Cary NC.
  25. Schuster A, Friedt W 1998 Glucosinolate content and composition as parameters of quality of canola meal. Industrial Crops and Products 7:297-302. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0926-6690(97)00061-7
  26. Slominski BA, Campbell LD 1990 Non-starch polysaccharides of canola meal: Quantification, digestibility in poultry and potential benefit of dietary enzyme supplementation. J Sci Food Agric 53:175-184. https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.2740530205
  27. Woyengo TA, Emiola A, Owusu-Asiedu A, Guenter W, Simmins PH, Nyachoti CM 2010 Thermo-stable Escherichia coli phytase improves growth performance and nutrient utilization in broilers fed mash and pelleted corn-soybeanmeal-based diets Can J Anim Sci 90:529-536. https://doi.org/10.4141/cjas10049