The Journal of Korean Academy of Prosthodontics (대한치과보철학회지)

The Korean Academy of Prosthodonitics (대한치과보철학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The influence of iatrogenic mobilization in the initial stage of implant installation on final osteointegration

임플란트 식립 초기 의원성 동요가 최종 골결합에 미치는 영향

  • Kwak, Myeong-Bae (Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Kyungpook National University) ;
  • Cho, Jin-Hyun (Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Kyungpook National University) ;
  • Lee, Du-Heong (Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Kyungpook National University) ;
  • Lee, Cheong-Hee (Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Kyungpook National University)
  • 곽명배 (경북대학교 치과대학 치과보철학교실) ;
  • 조진현 (경북대학교 치과대학 치과보철학교실) ;
  • 이두형 (경북대학교 치과대학 치과보철학교실) ;
  • 이청희 (경북대학교 치과대학 치과보철학교실)
  • Received : 2014.03.24
  • Accepted : 2014.04.16
  • Published : 2014.04.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Purpose: The aim of present investigation was to find out the influence of several times iatrogenic mobilization in the initial stage of implant installation on bone-implant osteointegration. Materials and methods: The experimental implants (3.75 mm in diameter, 8.0 mm in length) were made of commercially pure (Grade IV) titanium, and were treated with RBM ($MegaGen^{(R)}$: Ca-P) on lower 4.0 mm part. Only lower part of implant was inserted to bone and the implants were nonsubmerged. The 130 implants (two in each tibia) were inserted into the monocortical tibias of 33 rabbits which each weighed more than 3.5 kg (Female, New Zealand White). According to the removal torque interval, the groups were divided into 13 groups, group I (1 day), group II (1 day + 2 days), group III (1 day + 2 days + 3 days), group IV (1 day + 2 days + 3 days + 4 days), group V (2 days), group VI (2 days + 4 days), group VII (2 days + 4 days + 6 days), group VIII (2 days + 4 days + 6 days + 8 days), group IX (4 days), group X (4 days + 7 days), group XI (4 days + 7 days + 10 days), group XII (4 days + 7 days + 10 days + 14 days) and control group. In the control group, the removal torque was measured at 8 weeks with a digital torque gauge (Mark-10, USA). In the experimental groups, the removal torque was given once, twice, three times or four times by experiment design before the final removal torque and the value was measured each time. The implants were then screwed back to their original positions. All the experimental groups were given a final healing time of 8 weeks after placement, in which values were compared with the control groups and the 1st, 2nd, 3rd or 4th removal torque values in each experimental group. Results: In comparison of the final removal torque tests among experimental groups, the removal torque value of experimental groups except group XII were not statistically different that of control group. And the values of group I and II were significantly higher than the values of group VI, VIII, X, XI, and XII. In addition, the values of group III, IV, and V were significantly higher than group XI and XII. In comparison of the removal torque in the each experimental group, the final removal torque were significantly higher in all groups except group VIII, X, XI, and XII. Conclusion: If sufficient healing time was allowed, a few mobilization of fixture at the very early stage after the implant placement in the rabbits didn't interrupt the final bone to implant osseointegration.

연구 목적: 이 연구의 목적은 임플란트 식립 초기 수회의 의원성 동요가 최종 골결합에 미치는 영향을 확인하는 것이다. 연구 재료 및 방법: 순수한 티타늄(Grade IV) 으로 직경 3.75 mm, 길이 8 mm의 실험용 임플란트를 제작한 후, 하방 4 mm에 RBM 표면처리($MegaGen^{(R)}$: Ca-P)를 하였다. 임플란트의 하부만 골에 식립되었으며 비침하시켰다. 수술은 3.5 kg이상의 토끼의 좌우 경골의 단층 치밀골에 각각 2개씩 130개를 통상적인 방법으로 식립하였다(Female, New Zealand White). 비틀림 제거 간격에 따라, 다음과 같은 13개의 군으로 나누었다; Group I (1일), Group II (1일 + 2일), Group III (1일 + 2일 + 3일), Group IV (1일 + 2일 + 3일 + 4일), Group V (2일), Group VI (2일 + 4일), Group VII (2일 + 4일 + 6일), Group VIII (2일 + 4일 + 6일 + 8일), Group IX (4일), Group X (4일 + 7일), Group XI (4일 + 7일 + 10일), Group XII (4일 + 7일 + 10일 + 14일), 그리고 대조군. 대조군은 식립 후 8주의 치유기간을 준 후 최종 비틀림 제거력을 측정하였다(Mark-10, USA). 실험군은 각각의 조건에 맞추어 1회에서 4회에 걸쳐 비틀림 제거력을 측정하였다. 비틀림 제거력을 측정한 이후에 대체적으로 임플란트를 측정 전의 위치로 재위치시켰다. 모든 실험군에서 임플란트 식립 후 8주간의 치유기간을 준 다음 최종 비틀림 제거력을 측정하여 대조군, 각 실험군의 1, 2, 3, 4번째 비틀림 제거력과 비교하였다. 결과: 실험군 간에 최종 비틀림 제거력을 비교한 결과에서, XII군을 제외한 실험군의 비틀림 제거력은 대조군과 유의할만한 차이를 보이지는 않았다. 그리고 실험 I군과 II군의 값은 VI, VIII, X, XI, XII군의 값보다 유의하게 높게 나타났다. 그리고 III, IV, V군은 XI, XII군의 값보다 유의하게 높게 나타났다. 각 실험군간 비틀림 제거력 비교에서, 최종 비틀림 제거력은 VIII, X, XI, XII군을 제외한 모든 군에서 높게 나타났다. 결론: 충분한 치유기간이 주어진다면, 토끼에게 임플란트 식립 후 매우 이른 초기에 지대주에 가해지는 약간의 동요는 임플란트 골결합에 영향을 미치지 않았다.

Keywords

References

  1. Branemark PI, Adell R, Breine U, Hansson BO, Lindstrom J, Ohlsson A. Intra-osseous anchorage of dental prostheses. I. Experimental studies. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg 1969;3:81-100. https://doi.org/10.3109/02844316909036699
  2. Branemark PI, Hansson BO, Adell R, Breine U, Lindstrom J, Hallen O, Ohman A. Osseointegrated implants in the treatment of the edentulous jaw. Experience from a 10-year period. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Suppl 1977;16:1-132.
  3. Szmukler-Moncler S, Salama H, Reingewirtz Y, Dubruille JH. Timing of loading and effect of micromotion on bone-dental implant interface: review of experimental literature. J Biomed Mater Res 1998;43:192-203. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-4636(199822)43:2<192::AID-JBM14>3.0.CO;2-K
  4. Akagawa Y, Hashimoto M, Kondo N, Satomi K, Takata T, Tsuru H. Initial bone-implant interfaces of submergible and supramergible endosseous single-crystal sapphire implants. J Prosthet Dent 1986;55:96-100. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(86)90083-1
  5. Ivanoff CJ, Sennerby L, Lekholm U. Reintegration of mobilized titanium implants. An experimental study in rabbit tibia. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1997;26:310-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0901-5027(97)80878-8
  6. Ye SH. An investigation of reosseointegration according to time course after intentional mobilization of implant fixtures. Graduate School, Kyungpook National University. Thesis for a doctorate. 2009, p. 2-25.
  7. Jang JH, Cho JH, Lee CH. Study of the re-osseointegration of implant fixture after mechanical unscrewing. J Korean Acad Prosthodont 2010;48:209-14. https://doi.org/10.4047/jkap.2010.48.3.209
  8. Hwang YJ, Cho JH, Lee CH. Investigation of osseointegration according to the healing time after having iatrogenic mobility of implant fixtures. J Korean Acad Prosthodont 2010;48:308-14. https://doi.org/10.4047/jkap.2010.48.4.308
  9. Cho JH. The influence of intentional mobilization of implant fixtures before osseointegration. Graduate School, Kyungpook National University. Thesis for a doctorate. 2011, p. 2-17.
  10. Szmukler-Moncler S, Piattelli A, Favero GA, Dubruille JH. Considerations preliminary to the application of early and immediate loading protocols in dental implantology. Clin Oral Implants Res 2000;11:12-25. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.2000.011001012.x
  11. Ganeles J, Rosenberg MM, Holt RL, Reichman LH. Immediate loading of implants with fixed restorations in the completely edentulous mandible: report of 27 patients from a private practice. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2001;16:418-26.
  12. Tarnow DP, Emtiaz S, Classi A. Immediate loading of threaded implants at stage 1 surgery in edentulous arches: ten consecutive case reports with 1- to 5-year data. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1997;12:319-24.
  13. Piattelli A, Ruggeri A, Franchi M, Romasco N, Trisi P. An histologic and histomorphometric study of bone reactions to unloaded and loaded non-submerged single implants in monkeys: a pilot study. J Oral Implantol 1993;19:314-20.
  14. Schnitman PA, Wo¨hrle PS, Rubenstein JE, DaSilva JD, Wang NH. Ten-year results for Bra􀆆nemark implants immediately loaded with fixed prostheses at implant placement. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1997;12:495-503.
  15. Wismeijer D, Buser D, Belser D. ITI Treatment guide. 4th ed, Switzerland; Quintessence Publishing; 2010, p. 3-8.
  16. Gapski R, Wang HL, Mascarenhas P, Lang NP. Critical review of immediate implant loading. Clin Oral Implants Res 2003;14:515-27. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.2003.00950.x
  17. Roberts WE, Smith RK, Zilberman Y, Mozsary PG, Smith RS. Osseous adaptation to continuous loading of rigid endosseous implants. Am J Orthod 1984;86:95-111. https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9416(84)90301-4
  18. Brunski JB. Avoid pitfalls of overloading and micromotion of intraosseous implants. Dent Implantol Update 1993;4:77-81.
  19. Eriksson AR, Albrektsson T. Temperature threshold levels for heatinduced bone tissue injury: a vital-microscopic study in the rabbit. J Prosthet Dent 1983;50:101-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(83)90174-9
  20. Branemark PI, Engstrand P, Ohrnell LO, Grondahl K, Nilsson P, Hagberg K, Darle C, Lekholm U. Branemark Novum: a new treatment concept for rehabilitation of the edentulous mandible. Preliminary results from a prospective clinical followup study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 1999;1:2-16. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8208.1999.tb00086.x
  21. Roberts WE, Turley PK, Brezniak N, Fielder PJ. Implants: Bone physiology and metabolism. CDA J 1987;15:54-61.
  22. Sennerby L, Thomsen P, Ericson LE. Early tissue response to titanium implants inserted in rabbit cortical bone. J Mater Science: Mater Med 1993;4:240-50. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00122275
  23. Sennerby L,Thomsen P, Ericson LE. A morphometric and biomechanic comparison of titanium implants inserted in rabbit cortical and cancellous bone. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1992; 7:62-71.
  24. Sennerby L, Gottlow J. Clinical outcomes of immediate/early loading of dental implants. A literature review of recent controlled prospective clinical studies. Aust Dent J 2008;53:S82-8. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1834-7819.2008.00045.x
  25. Misch CE. Contemporary implant dentistry. St. Louis; Mosby; Elsevier; 1999, p. 799-834.