Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.4047/jkap.2014.52.2.105

The influence of iatrogenic mobilization in the initial stage of implant installation on final osteointegration  

Kwak, Myeong-Bae (Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Kyungpook National University)
Cho, Jin-Hyun (Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Kyungpook National University)
Lee, Du-Heong (Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Kyungpook National University)
Lee, Cheong-Hee (Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Kyungpook National University)
Publication Information
The Journal of Korean Academy of Prosthodontics / v.52, no.2, 2014 , pp. 105-112 More about this Journal
Abstract
Purpose: The aim of present investigation was to find out the influence of several times iatrogenic mobilization in the initial stage of implant installation on bone-implant osteointegration. Materials and methods: The experimental implants (3.75 mm in diameter, 8.0 mm in length) were made of commercially pure (Grade IV) titanium, and were treated with RBM ($MegaGen^{(R)}$: Ca-P) on lower 4.0 mm part. Only lower part of implant was inserted to bone and the implants were nonsubmerged. The 130 implants (two in each tibia) were inserted into the monocortical tibias of 33 rabbits which each weighed more than 3.5 kg (Female, New Zealand White). According to the removal torque interval, the groups were divided into 13 groups, group I (1 day), group II (1 day + 2 days), group III (1 day + 2 days + 3 days), group IV (1 day + 2 days + 3 days + 4 days), group V (2 days), group VI (2 days + 4 days), group VII (2 days + 4 days + 6 days), group VIII (2 days + 4 days + 6 days + 8 days), group IX (4 days), group X (4 days + 7 days), group XI (4 days + 7 days + 10 days), group XII (4 days + 7 days + 10 days + 14 days) and control group. In the control group, the removal torque was measured at 8 weeks with a digital torque gauge (Mark-10, USA). In the experimental groups, the removal torque was given once, twice, three times or four times by experiment design before the final removal torque and the value was measured each time. The implants were then screwed back to their original positions. All the experimental groups were given a final healing time of 8 weeks after placement, in which values were compared with the control groups and the 1st, 2nd, 3rd or 4th removal torque values in each experimental group. Results: In comparison of the final removal torque tests among experimental groups, the removal torque value of experimental groups except group XII were not statistically different that of control group. And the values of group I and II were significantly higher than the values of group VI, VIII, X, XI, and XII. In addition, the values of group III, IV, and V were significantly higher than group XI and XII. In comparison of the removal torque in the each experimental group, the final removal torque were significantly higher in all groups except group VIII, X, XI, and XII. Conclusion: If sufficient healing time was allowed, a few mobilization of fixture at the very early stage after the implant placement in the rabbits didn't interrupt the final bone to implant osseointegration.
Keywords
Dental implant; Osseointegration;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 2  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Sennerby L, Gottlow J. Clinical outcomes of immediate/early loading of dental implants. A literature review of recent controlled prospective clinical studies. Aust Dent J 2008;53:S82-8.   DOI   ScienceOn
2 Misch CE. Contemporary implant dentistry. St. Louis; Mosby; Elsevier; 1999, p. 799-834.
3 Schnitman PA, Wo¨hrle PS, Rubenstein JE, DaSilva JD, Wang NH. Ten-year results for Bra􀆆nemark implants immediately loaded with fixed prostheses at implant placement. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1997;12:495-503.
4 Wismeijer D, Buser D, Belser D. ITI Treatment guide. 4th ed, Switzerland; Quintessence Publishing; 2010, p. 3-8.
5 Gapski R, Wang HL, Mascarenhas P, Lang NP. Critical review of immediate implant loading. Clin Oral Implants Res 2003;14:515-27.   DOI   ScienceOn
6 Roberts WE, Smith RK, Zilberman Y, Mozsary PG, Smith RS. Osseous adaptation to continuous loading of rigid endosseous implants. Am J Orthod 1984;86:95-111.   DOI   ScienceOn
7 Brunski JB. Avoid pitfalls of overloading and micromotion of intraosseous implants. Dent Implantol Update 1993;4:77-81.
8 Eriksson AR, Albrektsson T. Temperature threshold levels for heatinduced bone tissue injury: a vital-microscopic study in the rabbit. J Prosthet Dent 1983;50:101-7.   DOI   ScienceOn
9 Branemark PI, Engstrand P, Ohrnell LO, Grondahl K, Nilsson P, Hagberg K, Darle C, Lekholm U. Branemark Novum: a new treatment concept for rehabilitation of the edentulous mandible. Preliminary results from a prospective clinical followup study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 1999;1:2-16.   DOI
10 Roberts WE, Turley PK, Brezniak N, Fielder PJ. Implants: Bone physiology and metabolism. CDA J 1987;15:54-61.
11 Sennerby L, Thomsen P, Ericson LE. Early tissue response to titanium implants inserted in rabbit cortical bone. J Mater Science: Mater Med 1993;4:240-50.   DOI   ScienceOn
12 Sennerby L,Thomsen P, Ericson LE. A morphometric and biomechanic comparison of titanium implants inserted in rabbit cortical and cancellous bone. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1992; 7:62-71.
13 Ivanoff CJ, Sennerby L, Lekholm U. Reintegration of mobilized titanium implants. An experimental study in rabbit tibia. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1997;26:310-5.   DOI   ScienceOn
14 Ye SH. An investigation of reosseointegration according to time course after intentional mobilization of implant fixtures. Graduate School, Kyungpook National University. Thesis for a doctorate. 2009, p. 2-25.
15 Szmukler-Moncler S, Piattelli A, Favero GA, Dubruille JH. Considerations preliminary to the application of early and immediate loading protocols in dental implantology. Clin Oral Implants Res 2000;11:12-25.   DOI   ScienceOn
16 Jang JH, Cho JH, Lee CH. Study of the re-osseointegration of implant fixture after mechanical unscrewing. J Korean Acad Prosthodont 2010;48:209-14.   DOI
17 Hwang YJ, Cho JH, Lee CH. Investigation of osseointegration according to the healing time after having iatrogenic mobility of implant fixtures. J Korean Acad Prosthodont 2010;48:308-14.   DOI
18 Cho JH. The influence of intentional mobilization of implant fixtures before osseointegration. Graduate School, Kyungpook National University. Thesis for a doctorate. 2011, p. 2-17.
19 Ganeles J, Rosenberg MM, Holt RL, Reichman LH. Immediate loading of implants with fixed restorations in the completely edentulous mandible: report of 27 patients from a private practice. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2001;16:418-26.
20 Tarnow DP, Emtiaz S, Classi A. Immediate loading of threaded implants at stage 1 surgery in edentulous arches: ten consecutive case reports with 1- to 5-year data. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1997;12:319-24.
21 Piattelli A, Ruggeri A, Franchi M, Romasco N, Trisi P. An histologic and histomorphometric study of bone reactions to unloaded and loaded non-submerged single implants in monkeys: a pilot study. J Oral Implantol 1993;19:314-20.
22 Branemark PI, Adell R, Breine U, Hansson BO, Lindstrom J, Ohlsson A. Intra-osseous anchorage of dental prostheses. I. Experimental studies. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg 1969;3:81-100.   DOI
23 Branemark PI, Hansson BO, Adell R, Breine U, Lindstrom J, Hallen O, Ohman A. Osseointegrated implants in the treatment of the edentulous jaw. Experience from a 10-year period. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Suppl 1977;16:1-132.
24 Szmukler-Moncler S, Salama H, Reingewirtz Y, Dubruille JH. Timing of loading and effect of micromotion on bone-dental implant interface: review of experimental literature. J Biomed Mater Res 1998;43:192-203.   DOI   ScienceOn
25 Akagawa Y, Hashimoto M, Kondo N, Satomi K, Takata T, Tsuru H. Initial bone-implant interfaces of submergible and supramergible endosseous single-crystal sapphire implants. J Prosthet Dent 1986;55:96-100.   DOI   ScienceOn