DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Study on the Determinants of Technological Level in Korean Bioenergy Firms

한국 바이오에너지기업의 기술수준 영향요인 분석

  • Park, Chang-Dae (Graduate School of Energy & Environment, Seoul National University of Science and Technology) ;
  • Kim, Doo-Chun (Graduate School of Energy & Environment, Seoul National University of Science and Technology) ;
  • Park, Jung-Gu (Graduate School of Energy & Environment, Seoul National University of Science and Technology)
  • 박창대 (서울과학기술대학교 에너지환경대학원) ;
  • 김두천 (서울과학기술대학교 에너지환경대학원) ;
  • 박중구 (서울과학기술대학교 에너지환경대학원)
  • Received : 2014.07.23
  • Accepted : 2014.11.28
  • Published : 2014.12.31

Abstract

This study analyzes the technological level of Korean bioenergy firms and its determinants by using a multiple logistic regression analysis based on a survey. As the result of analysis, the technological level of Korean bioenergy firms has been positively influenced by the firm size, R&D investments and R&D manpower, but negatively influenced by the competition in domestic market and economy of scale. The policy implications of this study are related to achieve the economy of scale and coevolve between demand and supply-firms for the improvement of the technological level of Korean bioenergy firms.

본 논문은 한국 바이오에너지기업을 대상으로 연구개발 효율성을 평가하는 지표 중 하나로서 기술수준을 세계최고수준과 대비하고, 이에 영향을 미치는 요인에 대해 분석하였다. 분석 방법론으로 기술수준에 영향을 미치는 영향변수(규모의 경제, 연구개발투자 및 인력 비중, 기업의 매출액, 국내시장의 경쟁정도)를 포함하는 분석모형을 설정하고, 한국 바이오에너지기업을 대상으로 설문조사를 실시한 후 다항회귀분석을 사용하였다. 분석결과, 한국 바이오에너지기업의 R&D 투자의 비중과 R&D 인력의 비중이 높을수록 그리고 기업의 규모가 클수록 기술수준에 긍정적인 영향을 미쳤다. 반면, 규모의 경제를 달성하거나 국내시장의 경쟁정도가 높을수록 기술수준에 부정적인 영향을 미치는 것으로 분석되었다. 정책적 시사점은 한국 바이오에너지기업의 기술수준 제고를 위해 규모의 경제효과를 달성하고, 대 중 소기업 간 상생할 수 있도록 하는 정책을 추진할 필요가 있다.

Keywords

References

  1. Aghion, P., N. Bloom, R. Blundell, R. Griffith and P. Howitt. : Competition and innovation: An inverted-U relationship, Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol. 120, pp. 701-728 (2005)
  2. Arrow, K. J. : Welfare and the Allocation of Resources for Invention, in R. R. Nelson (ed), The Rate and Direction of Inventive Activity: Economic and social Factors, Princeton University Press, pp. 602-625 (1962)
  3. Bae, J. G. : Waste-resource Biomass Energy Policy & Technology, A-JIN (2013)
  4. Damanpour F. : An Integration of Research Findings of Effects of Firm Size and 5. Market Competition on Product and Process Innovations, British Journal of Management, Vol. 21, pp. 996-1010 (2010) https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8551.2009.00628.x
  5. Eldred, E. W. and McGrath, M. E. : Commercializing New Technology-I, Research Technology Management, Vol. 40, No.1, pp.41-47 (1997)
  6. Flor M. L. and Oltra M. J. : Identification of Innovating Firms through Technol-ogical Innovation Indicators: An Application to the Spanish Ceramic Tile Industry, Research Policy, Vol. 33, pp. 323-336 (2004) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2003.09.009
  7. Galbraith, J.K. : "American Capitalism", 2nd ed., Boston : Houton Mifflin (1956)
  8. Greer, D. F. : Industrial Organization and Public Policy, 3rd ed. New York: Macmillan, pp. 664-666 (1992)
  9. Hana Institute of Finance : Analysis on Commercialization of Bio-energy & Fuel Cell (2007)
  10. Hecker, A. and Ganter, A. : The Influence of Product Market Competition on Technological and Management Innovation: Firm-Level Evidence from a Large-Scale Survey, European Management Review, Vol. 10, pp. 17-33 (2013) https://doi.org/10.1111/emre.12005
  11. International Energy Agency : Energy Technology Perspectives 2010 (2010)
  12. International Energy Agency : Key World Energy Statistics 2012 (2012)
  13. International Energy Agency : World Energy Outlook 2013 (2013)
  14. Kim, E. Y. : A Study on the Determinants of Technological Innovation in the Korean Manufacturing Firms - Focusing on Technological Regime -, Journal of Industrial Economics and Business, Vol. 24, No.3, pp. 1451-1478 (2011)
  15. Kim, Y. I. : 2012 Green Technology Knowledge Map-Bioenergy, Korea Institute of Science and Technology Information (2013)
  16. Kim, D. H. and Choi, J. Y. : Analyzing Outcomes and Determinants of Product Innovation by Sectoral Types in the Korean Manufacturing Industry, Journal of Industrial Economics and Business, Vol. 24, No.3, pp. 1615-1633 (2011)
  17. Korea Energy Management Corporation, New & Renewable Energy Center : 2012 New & Renewable Energy Classification Supply Ratio (2013)
  18. Korea Energy Management Corporation, New & Renewable Energy Center : New & Renewable Energy Introduction-Biomass-Summary, http://www.energy.or.kr/knrec/11/KNREC110700.asp, (2013)
  19. Korea Institute for Industrial Economics & Trade : Major Issue & Countermeasures of New & Renewable Energy Industry (2012)
  20. Korea Institute for Industrial Economics & Trade : Make-up Plans of Industrial Ecosystem for Coevolution between Large Renewable Companies and Small Renewable Business (2012)
  21. Korea Institute of Science & Technology Evaluation and Planning : A Research of the improvement for R&D budget between compilation and execution in environmental field (2013)
  22. Korea Institute of Science & Technology Evaluation and Planning : Green Energy Strategy Roadmap 2011 - Biofuel (2011)
  23. Kotabe, M. : "Global Sourcing Strategy: R&D, Manufacturing and Marketing Interfaces", New York: Quorum Books (1992)
  24. Lee, C. S. : Determinants of Technological Level in Korean Energy Industry, Journal of Energy Engineering, Vol. 18, No. 2, pp. 75-86 (2009)
  25. Scherer, F. M. : Industrial Market Structure and Economic Performance, Rand McNally (1980)
  26. Schumpeter, J. A. : The Theory of Economic Development, Cambridge: Harvard University Press (1934)
  27. Schumpeter, J. A.: Capitalism, Socialism, and Democracy, New York: Harper & Row (1942)
  28. Shin, J. K. and Jang, S. D. : Determinants of R&D Investment Efficiency in Manufacturing SMEs, Journal of Human Resource Management Research, Vol. 16 No. 4, pp. 165-178 (2009)
  29. So, J. Y. : A Analysis on Domestic and Foreign Biomass & Waste-to-Energy of Potential and Securing for RPS, Basic Research Report 13-22, Korea Energy Economics Institute (2013)
  30. Souitaris, V. : Firm-Specific Competencies Determining Technological Innovation : A Survey in Greece, R&D Management, Vol. 32, No.1, pp.61-77 (2002) https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9310.00239
  31. Sturgeon, T. J. & Lee, J. R. : Industry Co-evolution and the Rise of a Shared Supply-base for Electronics Manufacturing, presented at the mason and Winter Conference (2001)
  32. Wang, E. : R&D efficiency and economic performance: A cross-country analysis using the stochastic frontier approach, Journal of Policy Modeling, Vol. 29, pp. 345-360 (2007) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpolmod.2006.12.005
  33. Yoon, Y. M. : A Study on Usage Pattern & Revitalization of Korea Bioenergy, Korea Rural Economic Institute, World Agriculture, Vol.162 (2014)
  34. Zhou, X., Zhang, J., Li, J. : Industrial structural transformation and carbon dioxide emissions in China, Energy Policy, vol. 57, pp. 43-51 (2013) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2012.07.017