기술혁신학회지 (Journal of Korea Technology Innovation Society)

  • 제17권4호
  • /
  • Pages.763-785
  • /
  • 2014
  • /
  • 1598-2912(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2713-8666(eISSN)
한국기술혁신학회 (Korea Technology Innovation Society)
권호 표지

과학기술혁신정책 이슈와 학술연구 간의 상호관계연구: 2008~2011년 주요 일간지와 학술지에 대한 질적내용분석을 중심으로

Interactions between Science, Technology and Innovation Policy Issues and Academic Research: A Case of the Qualitative Content Analysis on Major Newspapers and Academic Journals between 2008-2011

  • 투고 : 2014.10.02
  • 심사 : 2014.12.31
  • 발행 : 2014.12.01
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

사회에서 논의되는 과학기술혁신정책 이슈와 학술영역에서의 이론적 논의는 상호작용한다. 둘 사이의 상호작용을 이해하는 것은 보다 나은 정책을 제안하고 학술연구의 사회적 가치를 높이고자 하는 노력에 중요한 시사점을 제공해 줄 수 있다. 이런 배경아래 본 논문은 한국에서의 과학기술혁신정책 이슈와 학술연구 사이의 상호작용을 탐색하고자 주요 일간지와 학술지에 대한 질적내용분석을 수행했다. 연구를 통해 우리는 세 가지를 확인할 수 있었다. 첫째, 사회에서 단기간에 등장한 과학기술혁신정책 이슈를 대상으로 하는 연구들이 학술영역에서 뒤이어 등장했다. 둘째, 오랜 시간에 걸쳐 한국사회와 기술 하부구조에서 진행되어온 혁신시스템의 변화를 관찰하여 개념화 시킨 학술연구들이 과학기술혁신정책 이슈형성에 직간접적으로 반영됐다. 셋째, 과학기술의 사회적 역할과 전통 경제학 영역에서 다루어진 주제에 대해 현장에서의 과학기술혁신정책 연구수요가 존재하지만 아직 많은 연구가 이루어지지는 못하고 있다. 세 가지 연구결과는 정책입안자들이 한국에 필요한 정책과제를 발굴하고 연구자들이 새로운 연구대상을 확인하는 과정에 도움을 줄 수 있을 것이다.

Science, technology and innovation policy (STI policy) is a result of the interactions between the social issues and academic research. Understanding the interactions of the STI policy between the social issues and academic research can throw some light on designing better policies and enhancing the social value of academic research. Thus, this paper explores the interactions of the STI policy between the social issues and academic research using the qualitative content analysis of major newspapers and journal articles in Korea. We have three major findings. First, on the one hand, academic research rose after uprising changes in the STI policy issues in the society. Second, on the other hand, social issues on STI policy were influenced by academic research reflecting the fundamental changes in the Korean innovation system and the nature of technology. Third, there are strong policy demands regarding the role of the STI policy for society and for traditional economic domains, but relevant research is scarce up to now. These findings contribute to uncovering the potential policy domains and agendas for policy makers and researchers.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. 김병윤.정철우.김길선 (2011), "미국에서의 기술경영 논의의 진화: 한국에 대한 시사점을 중심으로", 기술혁신연구, 19(2): 129-152.
  2. 김석관 (2009), "개방형 혁신은 새로운 혁신 방법론인가?: Chesbrough 의 개방형 혁신이론에 대한 비판적 평가", 기술혁신연구, 17(3): 99-133.
  3. 김승혁.박용찬.최희정.박영수.고지현.엄혜진.최현도.정진주.김인혜.전민정 (2011), 산업기술정책 미래아젠다 연구, 서울: 인터젠컨설팅.
  4. 노풍두.조용곤.조근태 (2011), "조직의 창의성 수준 평가 모델 개발", 기술혁신학회지, 14(1): 109-138.
  5. 민철구.김병목.고상원.송성수.정근하.최영락.허현회.홍정임 (2006), 과학기술 정책연구 20년. 서울: 과학기술정책연구원.
  6. 송위진 (2002), "기술혁신정책의 진화와 기술혁신이론", 과학기술학연구, 2(1): 39-61.
  7. 송위진 (2012), 기술혁신정책의 진화와 과제, STEPI WORKING PAPER SERIES, 서울: 과학기술정책연구원.
  8. 양혜영.손석호.한민규.한종민.임현 (2011), "과학지도작성을 통한 미래기술 발굴 및정부 R&D의 동적 투자방향성 설정 연구", 기술혁신연구, 19(3): 1-29.
  9. 정선양.조성복.석재진 (2009), "정부출연연구기관의 창의적 인적자원 양성전략: 전주기적 인력관리의 관점에서", 기술혁신연구, 17(2): 187-206.
  10. 조인동.김남규.곽기영 (2012), "데이터 마이닝과 소셜 네트워크 분석을 통한 중심 학술 키워드 추천 방법론", Entrue Journal of Information Technology, 11(1): 87-99.
  11. 주상현 (2002), "한국 행정학 연구경향의 실증적 분석", 한국행정학보, 36(3): 39-55.
  12. 황혜란 (2011), "공공연구부문의 탈추격형 혁신활동특성 분석 및 과제: 대덕연구개발특구를 중심으로", 기술혁신학회지, 14(2): 157-176.
  13. Bartzokas, A. and Teubal, M. (2002), "A Framework for Policy Oriented Innovation Studies in Industrialising Countries", Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 11(4-5): 477-496. https://doi.org/10.1080/10438590200000009
  14. Beck, U. (1992), Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity, London: Sage.
  15. Bennett, C. and Howlett, M. (1992), "The Lessons of Learning: Reconciling Theories of Policy Learning and Policy Change", Policy Sciences, 25(3): 275-294. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00138786
  16. Birkinshaw, J., Healey, M. P., Suddaby, R. and Weber, K. (2014), "Debating the Future of Management Research", Journal of Management Studies, 51(1): 38-55. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12061
  17. Borras, S. (2011), "Policy Learning and Organizational Capacities in Innovation Policies", Science and Public Policy, 38(9): 725-734. https://doi.org/10.3152/030234211X13070021633323
  18. Cajaiba-Santana, G. (2014), "Social Innovation: Moving the Field Forward. A Conceptual Framework", Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 82(0): 42-51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2013.05.008
  19. Calero, C., Buter, R., Cabello Valdes, C. and Noyons, E. (2006), "How to Identify Research Groups Using Publication Analysis: An Example in the Field of Nanotechnology", Scientometrics, 66(2): 365-376. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-006-0026-z
  20. Chaminade, C. and Edquist, C. (2006), "From Theory to Practice: The Use of the Systems of Innovation Approach in Innovation Policy", In Chaminade, C. and Edquist, C. (eds.), Innovation, Science and Institutional Change, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  21. Chesbrough, H. W. (2003), Open Innovation: The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology, Boston, Mass: Harvard Business Press.
  22. Choung, J.-Y., Hwang, H.-R. and Song, W. (2014), "Transitions of Innovation Activities in Latecomer Countries: An Exploratory Case Study of South Korea", World Development, 54(0): 156-167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2013.07.013
  23. Dacin, P. A., Dacin, M. T. and Matear, M. (2010), "Social Entrepreneurship: Why We Don't Need a New Theory and How We Move Forward from Here", Academy of Management Perspectives, 24(3): 37-57. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMP.2010.52842950
  24. De Bakker, F. G. A., Groenewegen, P. and Den Hond, F. (2005), "A Bibliometric Analysis of 30 Years of Research and Theory on Corporate Social Responsibility and Corporate Social Performance", Business & Society, 44(3): 283-317. https://doi.org/10.1177/0007650305278086
  25. Ferrell, B., Virani, R., Grant, M. and Borneman, T. (1999), "Analysis of Content Regarding Death and Bereavement in Nursing Texts", Psycho-Oncology, 8(6): 500-510. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-1611(199911/12)8:6<500::AID-PON411>3.0.CO;2-8
  26. Hsieh, H.-F. and Shannon, S. E. (2005), "Three Approaches to Qualitative Content Analysis", Qualitative Health Research, 15(9): 1277-1288. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732305276687
  27. Kim, L. (1997), Imitation to Innovation: The Dynamics of Korea's Technological Learning, Boston, Mass: Harvard Business Press.
  28. Kochan, T. A., Guillen, M. F., Hunter, L. W. and O'Mahony, S. (2009), "Introduction to the Special Research Forum--Public Policy and Management Research: Finding the Common Ground", Academy of Management Journal, 52(6): 1088-1100. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMJ.2009.47084646
  29. Ladi, S. (2005), Globalisation, Policy Transfer and Policy Research Institutes, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
  30. Lengrand, L., Miles, I. and Quevreux, A. (2002), Innovation Tomorrow. Luxembourg, European Commission.
  31. Leonhardt (2014), "The Quiet Movement to Make Government Fail Less Often", New York Times, (2014.7.15).
  32. Martin, B. R. (2012), "The Evolution of Science Policy and Innovation Studies", Research Policy, 41(7): 1219-1239. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2012.03.012
  33. Morlacchi, P. and Martin, B. R. (2009), "Emerging Challenges for Science, Technology and Innovation Policy Research: A Reflexive Overview", Research Policy, 38(4): 571-582. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2009.01.021
  34. Mytelka, L. K. and Smith, K. (2002), "Policy Learning and Innovation Theory: An Interactive and Co-Evolving Process", Research Policy, 31(8-9): 1467-1479. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(02)00076-8
  35. Nelson, R. R. and Winter, S. G. (1982), An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change, Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
  36. OECD (2005), Governance of Innovation System, Paris, OECD.
  37. Pawson, R. (2006), Evidence-Based Policy: A Realist Perspective, London: Sage.
  38. Rainer, P., Cropley, B., Jarvis, S. and Griffiths, R. (2011), "From Policy to Practice: The Challenges of Providing High Quality Physical Education and School Sport Faced by Head Teachers within Primary Schools", Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy, 17(4): 429-446.
  39. Rosengren, K. E. (1981), Advances in Scandinavia Content Analysis: An Introduction, CA: Sage.
  40. Rothwell, R. and Dodgson, M. (1992), "European Technology Policy Evolution: Convergence Towards Smes and Regional Technology Transfer", Technovation, 12(4): 223-238. https://doi.org/10.1016/0166-4972(92)90044-I
  41. Schuck, P. (2014), Why Government Fails So Often: And How It Can Do Better , Princeton: Princeton University Press.
  42. Stiglitz, J. E. (1996), "Some Lessons from the East Asian Miracle", The World Bank Research Observer, 11(2): 151-177. https://doi.org/10.1093/wbro/11.2.151
  43. Stone, D. (2000), "Non-Governmental Policy Transfer: The Strategies of Independent Policy Institutes", Governance, 13(1): 45-70. https://doi.org/10.1111/0952-1895.00123
  44. Tesch, R. (1990), Qualitative Research: Analysis Types and Software Tools, Bristol, PA: Falmer.