DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Survey on Indoor Environments and Learning Efficiency in University Classrooms

대학 강의실의 실내 환경요소 및 학습효율 조사 분석

  • 서민호 (부경대학교 대학원 건축공학과) ;
  • 정근주 (부경대학교 건축공학과)
  • Published : 2013.04.25

Abstract

The learning efficiency of university students has been unsatisfactory due to the poor environmental control in the classroom during early and late of the semesters. Since it is well-known that large amount of cost and energy is required to maintain comfortable Indoor Environmental Quality (IEQ) in university classroom for the operation of HVAC system, university authorities require basic guideline to be provided for their decision making on maintenance of optimum IEQ. This research is performed to provide the basic information that can be used for establishing IEQ standards. Learning efficiency of students depending on changes in physical variables is investigated by surveying 45 students during two semesters (from fall 2011 to spring 2012). The physical variables in university classroom was 1) temperature variation of 14.7 to $26.7^{\circ}C$, 2) relative humidity of 25.3~70.1%, 3) air motion of 0~0.3m/s, 4) $CO_2$ concentration of 739~2003ppm, 5) illumination intensity of 376~630lux, and 6) noise level of 54.9 ~64.8dB. The average day temperature of outdoor during two semesters varied from 2.0 to $24.4^{\circ}C$. According to the results from this surveying, the variable that affects mostly on learning efficiency of the students was thermal comport followed by $CO_2$concentration, illumination, and noise level. About 75% of students showed higher learning efficiency in room temperature range of $18{\sim}23^{\circ}C$. The result was quite different from known thermally comfortable temperature range of $22{\sim}26^{\circ}C$ in the office. Further research is necessary on modifying the environmental standards for university classroom for higher learning efficiency.

Keywords

References

  1. Mendell MJ and Mirer A. Indoor thermal factors and symptoms in office workers; Findings from the U.S EPA Base study Indoor Air (19):291-302, 2009
  2. 최윤범 외, 실내 온열 환경이 근무자의 건강에 미치는 영향, 항공우주의학회지, 21권, 2호, 21-27, 2011
  3. 오근숙 외, 실내식물의 대학강의실 IAQ 및 학습집중도 개선효과, 대한건축학회논문집, 28권, 7호, 261-268, 2012
  4. Spengler, J.D. and K. Sexton. Indoor air pollution; Apublic health perspective, Science, vol.221(4605), 9-17, 1983 https://doi.org/10.1126/science.6857273
  5. Fisk W.J. et al., Estimates of improved productivity and health from better indoor environments, Indoor Air, 7:158-1 72, 1997 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0668.1997.t01-1-00002.x
  6. Seppanen O, Fisk W. et al., Effect of temperature on task performance in office environment. in 5th International Conference on Cold Climate Heating, Ventilating, and Air Conditioning. Moscow, 2005
  7. Pepler, R.D. The thermal comfort of students in climate controlled and non-climate controlled schools. ASHRAE Tran sactions, 78, 97-109, 1972
  8. Griffiths, I.D. The thermal environment. In D.C. Canter (E d.), Environmental interaction: Psychological approaches to our physical surroundings. New York: International Univers ities Press, 1975