Journal of the Architectural Institute of Korea Structure & Construction (대한건축학회논문집:구조계)

Architectural Institute of Korea (대한건축학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Model for Developing Composite Indicators for Construction Project Performance Evaluation

건설사업 성과평가를 위한 합성성과지표 작성 모델

  • Received : 2012.04.05
  • Published : 2012.07.25
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

A construction project has a complicated structure as it consists of many processes by various stakeholders. Performance measures are a key aspect of performance management. They are utilized to determine whether goals have been achieved and organizational strategy. Therefore, it is necessary to properly utilize performance indicators that can be measured quantitatively for objective performance measurement and management. In performance management, although performance is measured thru performance indicators, there are several problems in aggregate since performance indicators can have various attributes. Thus, composite indicators are required to aggregate various performance indicators for overall performance measurement of a construction project. This paper proposes a methodology to develop a composite performance indicator for a construction project to quantitatively measure construction project performance. This paper chooses standardization using a utility function to develop the composite indicator, and a fuzzy measure and fuzzy integral method for weighting and composite through review of advanced research in the development of construction composite indicators. The model consists of three parts: a standardization model, fuzzy measure and fuzzy integral. The proposed model focused on performance measures through a quantitative performance indicator for each project of a construction company. Case studies were utilized to validate the efficiency and customizability of the proposed methodology using fifty-two cases and three indicators (sales completion rate, cost spending rate, work productivity) that compose a cost-performance index of a construction company.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

Supported by : 한국연구재단

References

  1. 권순학, 퍼지측도 및 퍼지적분, 한국 퍼지 및 지능시스템학회 학술발표논문집, 6(2), 1996
  2. 김광춘, 진화 프로그래밍을 이용한 다기준 퍼지 제어, 한국퍼지 시스템 연구회지, 4(3), 1994
  3. 김영민, 철근콘크리트 건축구조물의 퍼지기반 상태평가, 서울대학교 박사학위논문, 2002
  4. 김창석, 퍼지 질의 처리를 위한 근접관계의 생성 방법, 한국지능시스템학회, 한국지능시스템학회 논문집, 4(1), 1994
  5. 손영선, 퍼지척도 퍼지적분을 이용한 휴먼 인터페이스의 평가, 한국 퍼지 및 지능시스템학회 학술발표논문집, 8(2), 1998
  6. 유일한, 김경래, 정영수, 진상윤, 건설기업 성과지표의 정량적인 특성 분석, 한국건설관리학회논문집, 7(4), 2006
  7. 유정호, 송상훈, 류원희, 이현수, 데이터 웨어하우스 기술을 활용한 건설프로젝트 성과분석 시스템 개발, 한국건설관리학회논문집, 6(1), 2005
  8. 이진춘, 퍼지적분과 퍼지추론은 이용한 관능검사규칙의 설계, 경영과학연구, 8, 1999
  9. 이학성, RTMS 구축 우선 순위 선정에 다속성 효용함수 적용 방안 연구, 중앙대학교 석사학위논문, 2000
  10. 전미연, 이형락, 유정호, 퍼지추론을 이용한 건설사업 성과지표의 표준화 및 합성방법, 대한건축학회논문집 구조계, 26(11), 2010
  11. 전성진, 김예상, 턴키 프로젝트의 주요 성공요인 분석에 관한 연구, 대한건축학회지, 19(6), 2003
  12. 차희성, 김태경, 건설 프로젝트 효율적 성과관리를 위한 핵심 지표 체계 구축, 한국건설관리학회논문집, 9(4), 2008
  13. 홍성세, 김경래, 신동우, 차희성, Web 기반의 건설기업 성과측정시스템 프로토타입 개발, 대한건축학회지, 22(7), 2006
  14. 황승국, 퍼지적분을 이용한 기업평가법, 산업경영시스템학회지, 19(40), 1996
  15. A. P. C. Chan, D. Scott, and A. P. L. Chan, Factors Affecting the Success of a Construction Project, Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 130(1), 2004
  16. D. K. H. Chua, Y. C. Kog, P. K. Loh, Critical Success Factors for Different project Objective, Journal of Construction Engineering and management, 125(3), 1999
  17. D. Dubois and H. Prade, Fuzzy Sets and Systems : Theory and Applications, Academic Press, 1980
  18. E. Westerveld, The project excellence model : linking success criteria and critical success factors, International Journal of Project Management, 21(6), 2003
  19. E. W. M. Lam, A. P. C. Chan, and D. W. M. Chan, Determinants of Successful Design-Build Projects, Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, ASCE, US, 134(5), 2008
  20. G. J. Klir and T. A. Folger, Fuzzy Sets Uncertainty and Information, Prentice-Hall. London, 1988
  21. H. Tahani and J. Keller, Information Fusion in Computer Vision Using The Fuzzy Integral, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, 20, 1990
  22. K. Evalgelidis, Performance measured performance gained, The Treasurer, February, 1992
  23. K. Ishii, and M. Sugeno, A Model of Human Evaluation Process Using Fuzzy Measure, International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, Elsevier, 22(1), 1985
  24. M. Freudenberg, Composite indicators of country performance: a critical assessment, OECD Science, Technology and Industry Working Papers 2003/16, 2003
  25. M. Grabisch, Fuzzy Integral in Multicriteria Decision Making, Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 69(3), 1995
  26. M. Saqib, R. U. Farooqui and S. H. Lodi, Assessment Critical Success Factors for Construction Projects in Pakistan, First International Conference on Construction in Developing Countries (ICCIDC-I-2008), 2008
  27. M. Sugeno, Theory of Fuzzy Integrals and its Applications, Doctoral Dissertation, Tokyo Institute of Technology, Tokyo, 1974
  28. Procurement Executives' Association, Guide to the Balanced Scorecard Performance Management Methodology, Washington, 1999
  29. R. Yang, Z. Wang, P. Heng, and K. Leung, Fuzzy Numbers and Fuzzification of the Choquet Integral, Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 153(1), 2005
  30. T. Onisawa, M. Sugeno, Y. Nishiwaki, H. Kawai, Y. Harima, Fuzzy Measure Analysis of Public Attitude Towards the Use of Nuclear Energy, Fuzzy Set and Systems, 20, 1986
  31. T. M. Qureshi, A. S. Warraich and S. T. Hijazi, Significance of project management perfomance assessment (PMPA) model, International Journal of Project Management, 27(4), 2009
  32. V. Sanvido, F. Grobler, K. Parfitt, M. Guvenis and M. Coyle, Critical Success Factors for Construction projects, Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 118(1), 1992
  33. W. Pedrycz and F. Gomide, An Introduction to Fuzzy Set : Analysis and Design, MIT Press, 1998