Correlation Between Tooth Mobility and other Periodontal Clinical Parameters of Teethhaving Periodontal Regenerative Treatment

치주재생 치료를 받은 치아의 동요도와 다른 치주임상적 지표 간의 상관관계

  • Son, Byung-Chan (Department of Periodontology, School of Dentistry, Pusan National University) ;
  • Kim, Sung-Jo (Department of Periodontology, School of Dentistry, Pusan National University) ;
  • Choi, Jeom-Il (Department of Periodontology, School of Dentistry, Pusan National University) ;
  • Lee, Ju-Youn (Department of Periodontology, School of Dentistry, Pusan National University)
  • 손병찬 (부산대학교 치의학전문대학원 치주과학교실) ;
  • 김성조 (부산대학교 치의학전문대학원 치주과학교실) ;
  • 최점일 (부산대학교 치의학전문대학원 치주과학교실) ;
  • 이주연 (부산대학교 치의학전문대학원 치주과학교실)
  • Received : 2011.12.23
  • Accepted : 2012.03.25
  • Published : 2012.03.30

Abstract

The ultimate goal of periodontal therapy is the regeneration of supporting tissues. It is recommended to avoid probing until 6~9 months following the regenerative therapy because the probing may jeopardize the newly formed tissues. We can measure tooth mobility objectively using Periotest. The purpose of this study is to investigate whether Periotest can be used to evaluate the treatment results alternatively, and whether there are the correlations between the changes of Periotest value (PTV) and other clinical parameters. Regenerative treatments have been performed on 29 teeth of twenty five patients, at Department of Periodontology, Pusan National University Hospital. We measured the tooth mobility by Periotest and other parameters at the baseline, 6 and 12 months after regenerative treatment. Compared to the baseline, there were the statistically significant improvements in all the parameters at 6 months and 12 months. There were statistically significant correlations among the probing depth, attachment level, gingival recession and PTV at baseline, 6 months, and 12 months. Also there was the correlation between changes in PTV and in the attachment level at each time of observation period. We may conclude that regenerative therapy would improve the clinical parameters and periodontal status and PTV would be an alternative index to evaluate the healing process after regenerative surgery.

치주치료의 궁극적 목표는 치주질환으로 상실된 치주조직의 재생이라고 볼 수 있다. 치주재생술식 후 회복을 평가하는 단계에서, 탐침과정이 초기 회복기의 신생조직에 위해한 영향을 줄 수 있다. 치아동요도는 치주조직이 치아를 지지하고 있는 상태를 평가하는 중요한 지표로 사용된다. 이에 본 연구에서는 치아동요도와 다른 임상지표간의 상관관계를 조사하고, 치아동요도를 측정하는 Periotest$^{(R)}$가 재생술식 후 초기 회복기에 탐침의 필요성을 배제할 수 있는지를 조사하고자 하는 것이다. 치주재생수술을 받은 25명의 환자, 29개의 치아를 대상으로 하였다. 부착수준, 치주낭 심도, 치아동요도 (Periotest$^{(R)}$ value PTV)등의 임상지표를 연구시작단계, 시술 후 6개월, 12개월에 측정하였다. 재생수술 후 모든 임상지표들이 개선되었고 (p<0.05), 각각의 시기에 부착수준, 탐침깊이, 치은퇴축과 PTV 사이의 통계적으로 유의한 상관관계가 관찰되었다. 또한 각 시기 사이의 임상지표와 PTV변화량의 상관관계에서 치주낭깊이와 부착수준이 상관관계가 있는 것으로 관찰되었다. 이상의 결과들로 치주재생술식 이후 임상지표들의 개선을 기대할 수 있으며, 재생술식 이후 회복기에 임상지표의 측정에 PTV가 보조적 역할을 할 수 있을 것으로 사료된다.

Keywords

References

  1. Bowers GM, Chadroff B, Carnevale R, et al. Histologic evaluation of new attachment apparatus formation in humans. Part I. Journal of Periodontology 1989;60:664-74. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.1989.60.12.664
  2. Garrett S. Periodontal regeneration around natural teeth. Annals of periodontology/the American Academy of Periodontology 1996;1:621-66. https://doi.org/10.1902/annals.1996.1.1.621
  3. Egelberg J. Regeneration and repair of periodontal tissues. Journal of Periodontal Research 1987;22:233-42. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0765.1987.tb01577.x
  4. Caton JG, Greenstein G. Factors related to periodontal regeneration. Periodontology 2000 1993;1:9-15. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0757.1993.tb00202.x
  5. Froum SJ, Gomez C. Periodontal regeneration. Current Opinion in Periodontology 1993:111-28.
  6. Melcher AH, McCulloch CA, Cheong T, et al. Cells from bone synthesize cementum-like and bone-like tissue in vitro and may migrate into periodontal ligament in vivo. Journal of Periodontal Research 1987;22:246-7. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0765.1987.tb01579.x
  7. Karring T, Isidor F, Nyman S, Lindhe J. New attachment formation on teeth with a reduced but healthy periodontal ligament. Journal of Clinical Periodontology 1985;12:51-60. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.1985.tb01353.x
  8. Nyman S, Karring T, Lindhe J, Planten S. Healing following implantation of periodontitis-affected roots into gingival connective tissue. Journal of Clinical Periodontology 1980;7:394-401. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.1980.tb02012.x
  9. Richardson CR, Mellonig JT, Brunsvold MA, et al. Clinical evaluation of Bio-Oss: a bovine-derived xenograft for the treatment of periodontal osseous defects in humans. Journal of Clinical Periodontology 1999;26:421-8. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-051X.1999.260702.x
  10. Cohen P, Mullarky R, Noble B, et al. Treatment of intraosseous lesions with anorganic bovine bone plus collagen. Entretiens de Bichat, Odontologie et Stomatologie 1990:91-4.
  11. Brion M, Clergeau S, Cohen P, et al. Anorganic bone plus collagen in the treatment of periodontal intrabony lesions. Journal of Periodontology 1991; 62:83. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.1991.62.1.83
  12. Carmagnola D, Berglundh T, Lindhe J. The effect of a fibrin glue on the integration of Bio-Oss with bone tissue. A experimental study in labrador dogs. Journal of Clinical Periodontology 2002;29:377-83. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-051X.2002.290501.x
  13. Nevins ML, Camelo M, Lynch SE, et al. Evaluation of periodontal regeneration following grafting intrabony defects with Bio-Oss Collagen: A human histologic report. The Internatial Journal of Periodontics & Restorative Dentistry 2003;23:9-17.
  14. Sculean A, Windisch P, Keglevich T, et al. Clinical and histologic evaluation of human intrabony defects treated with an enamel matrix protein derivative combined with a bovine-derived xenograft. The International Journal of Periodontics & Restorative Dentistry 2003;23:47-55.
  15. Clergeau LP, Danan M, ClergeauGuerithault S, Brion M. Healing response to anorganic bone implantation in periodontal intrabony defects in dogs .1. Bone regeneration. A microradiographic study. Journal of Periodontology 1996;67:140-9. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.1996.67.2.140
  16. Jepsen S, Eberhard J, Herrera D, Needleman I. A systematic review of guided tissue regeneration for periodontal furcation defects. What is the effect of guided tissue regeneration compared with surgical debridement in the treatment of furcation defects? Journal of Clinical Periodontology 2002;29:103-16.
  17. 최성호, 조규성, 김현수, 등. BBP (R) 가 치주 골내 낭 치유에 미치는 영향. 대한치주과학회지 2002; 32:213-24.
  18. Camargo PM, Lekovic V, Weinlaender M, et al. A controlled re-entry study on the effectiveness of bovine porous bone mineral used in combination with a collagen membrane of porcine origin in the treatment of intrabony defects in humans. Journal of Clinical Periodontology 2000;27:889-96. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-051x.2000.027012889.x
  19. Cohen ES. Atlas of cosmetic and reconstructive periodontal surgery: Pmph USA Ltd; 2007.
  20. Cortellini P, Tonetti MS. Focus on intrabony defects: guided tissue regeneration. Periodontology 2000 2000;22:104-32. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0757.2000.2220108.x
  21. Ferris RT. Quantitative evaluation of tooth mobility following initial periodontal therapy. Journal of Periodontology 1966;37:190-7. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.1966.37.3.190
  22. Laster L, Laudenbach KW, Stoller NH. An evaluation of clinical tooth mobility measurements. Journal of Periodontology 1975;46:603-7. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.1975.46.10.603
  23. Perlitsh MJ. A systematic approach to the interpretation of tooth mobility and its clinical implications. Dental Clinics of North America 1980;24:177-93.
  24. Rosling B, Nyman S, Lindhe J. The effect of systematic plaque control on bone regeneration in infrabony pockets. Journal of Clinical Periodontology 1976;3:38-53. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.1976.tb01849.x
  25. Lindhe J, Nyman S. The effect of plaque control and surgical pocket elimination on the establishment and maintenance of periodontal health. A longitudinal study of periodontal therapy in cases of advanced disease. Journal of Clinical Periodontology 1975;2:67-79. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.1975.tb01727.x
  26. Miller SC. Textbook of periodontia: The Blakiston company; 1950.
  27. Schulte W, Lukas D. The Periotest method. International Dental Journal 1992;42:433-40.
  28. Goodson J, Cugini M. Comparative response of mobile teeth following monolithic fiber therapy or scaling. Compendium (Newtown, Pa) Supplement 1988:S418.
  29. Schulte W, Lukas D, Ernst E. Periotest values and tooth mobility in periodontal disease: a comparative study. Quintessence Int 1990;21:289-93.
  30. Schulte W, d'Hoedt B, Lukas D, et al. Periotest for measuring periodontal characteristics--correlation with periodontal bone loss. Journal of Periodontal Research 1992;27:184-90. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0765.1992.tb01667.x
  31. Loe H. The Gingival Index, the Plaque Index and the Retention Index Systems. Journal of Periodontology 1967;38:Suppl:610-6. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.1967.38.6_part2.610
  32. Yukna RA, Callan DP, Krauser JT, et al. Multi-center clinical evaluation of combination anorganic bovinederived hydroxyapatite matrix (ABM)/cell binding peptide (P-15) as a bone replacement graft material in human periodontal osseous defects. 6-month results. Journal of Periodontology 1998;69:655-63. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.1998.69.6.655
  33. Schulte W. [The Periotest--periodontal status]. Zahnarztliche Mitteilungen 1986;76:1409-10, 12-4.
  34. Schulte W, Lukas D, Ernst E. [Periotest values and mobility of periodontally diseased teeth--comparative study]. Die Quintessenz 1991;42:1255-63.
  35. Egloff ET, Hochman M. The assessment of periodontal disease activity. Compendium Supplement 1988:S424-7.
  36. d'Hoedt B, Lukas D, Muhlbradt L, et al. [Periotest methods--development and clinical trial]. Deutsche zahnarztliche Zeitschrift 1985;40:113-25.