The Journal of the Korea Contents Association (한국콘텐츠학회논문지)

The Korea Contents Association (한국콘텐츠학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Effect for the Worker's Organizational Citizenship Behavior of Value Congruence and Vision Sharing in Social Enterprise

사회적 기업에서 비전공유와 가치일치가 근로자의 조직시민행동에 미치는 영향

  • 이용재 (호서대학교 사회복지학과)
  • Received : 2012.01.06
  • Accepted : 2012.01.31
  • Published : 2012.03.28
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

This study analyzed on the effect worker's organizational citizenship behaviors of vision sharing and values congruence in social enterprise. Analysis results are as follows: the higher the degree of match value of worker and organization, organization's vision have on active organizational citizenship behaviors in social enterprise. And, non-profit organization, full-time employee and Non-disadvantaged are actively organizational citizenship behaviors. Social enterprises's purpose are to solve the social problem in communities and creating the jobs for the vulnerable. Therefore, the administrator of social enterprise strive to share the vision of the organization with worker, and should pay more effort in the selection process for selecting the worker that matches with organization's value.

본 연구에서는 사회적 기업의 경쟁력 제고에 중요한 종업원의 조직시민행동을 높이는데 비전공유와 가치일치가 어떠한 영향을 미치는지를 확인하였다. 분석결과 조직의 비전이 공유되고, 종업원과 조직의 가치관 일치 정도가 높을수록 조직시민행동이 활발한 것을 나타났다. 아울러 사회적 기업이 비영리조직 일수록, 사회적 기업의 종업원이 비 취약계층이고 정규직일수록 조직시민행동이 활발하였다. 사회문제의 해결과 취약계층에 대한 일자리 창출을 목적으로 하는 사회적 기업에 있어서 비전과 가치관의 공유는 영리기업에 비해서 더욱 중요하다. 따라서 사회적 기업의 관리자는 종업원들이 조직의 비전을 공유할 수 있도록 노력해야 하며, 단순히 수혜를 받을 대상자를 선발하는 것이 아니라 조직의 가치와 일치하는 사람이 조직에서 일할 수 있도록 선발과정에 더욱 노력을 기울여야 한다.

Keywords

References

  1. J. L. Laville, "Social enterprises developing 'proximity services," C. Borzaga, J. Defourny,(ed.), The Emergency of Social Enterprise, London, Routledge, pp.100-119, 2001.
  2. 심창학, "사회적기업의 개념정의 및 범위 설정에 관한 연구 : 유럽의 사회적 기업을 중심으로", 사회보장연구, 제23권, 제2호, 2009.
  3. C. Borzaga and A. Santauari, "Italy : from traditional co-operatives to innovative social enterpirse," C. Borzaga, J. Defourny(ed.), The Emergency of Social Enterprise, London, Routledge, pp.166-181, 2001.
  4. OECD, Social Enterprise, Paris, OECD, 1999.
  5. C. Borzaga and J. Defourny, The Emergency of Social Enterprise, London, Routledge, 2001.
  6. D. W. Organ, OCB: The "good soldier," syndrome, Lexington Books, 1988.
  7. P. M. Podsakoff, S. B. MacKenzie, J. B. Paine, and D. G. Bachrach, Organizational citizenship behaviors : A critical review of the theoretical and empirical literature and suggestions for future research, Journal of Management, Vol.26, pp.513-563, 2000. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920630002600307
  8. D. W. Organ and M. Konovsky, Cognitive versus affective determinants of organizational citizenship behavior, Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol.74, pp.157-164, 1989. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.74.1.157
  9. C. A. Smoth, D. W. Organ, and J. P. Near, Organizational citizenship behavior : it's nature and antecedents, Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol.68, pp.653-663, 1983. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.68.4.653
  10. L. J. Williams and S. E. Anderson, Job satisfaction and organizational commitment on predictors of organizational citizenship and in-role behavior, Journal of Management, Vol.17, pp.601-617, 1991. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639101700305
  11. L. Van Dyne, L. L. Cummings, and J. M. Parks, Extra-role behaviors : In pursuit of construct and definitional clarity. In L. L. Cummings & B. M. Staw(Eds.), Research in Organizational Behavior Greenwich, CT: JAI Press, Vol.17, pp.215-285, 1995.
  12. J. W. Graham, An essay on organizational citizenship behavior, Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal, Vol.4, pp.249-270, 1991. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01385031
  13. J. Meyer and N. Allen, Testing the "side-bet theory" of organizational commitment : Some methodological considerations, Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol.69, pp.372-378, 1984. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.69.3.372
  14. C. OReilly and J. Chatman, Organizational commitment and psychological attachment: The effects of compliance, identification, and internalization on prosocial behavior, Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol.71, pp.492-499, 1986. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.71.3.492
  15. W. Tsai and S. Ghoshal, Social capital and value creation : The role of intrafirm networks, Academy of Management and Journal, Vol.46, pp.97-105, 1998.
  16. L. Li, The effects of trust and shared vision of inward knowledge transfer in subsidiaries' intra-and inter-organizational relationships, International Business Review:14, pp.77-95, 2005. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2004.12.005
  17. M. H. Moore, Managing for value: Organizational strategy in for-profit nonprofit, and governmental organizations. Nonprofit and Volunary Sector Quartely, Vol.29, pp.183-204, 2000. https://doi.org/10.1177/089976400773746391
  18. 김형성, 황성원, "중앙부처 특채자들의 직무만족과 공정성 인식이 조직시민행동에 미치는 영향", 한국행정논집, 제23권, 제3호, pp.877-905, 2001.

Cited by

  1. Factors Influencing Organizational Socialization in Clinical Nurses vol.11, pp.4, 2017, https://doi.org/10.12811/kshsm.2017.11.4.053