DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

적토형 인위토양의 공간변이 비교 연구

A Comparison of Spatial Variation on Anthropogenic Soils

  • 투고 : 2012.11.12
  • 심사 : 2012.11.29
  • 발행 : 2012.12.31

초록

본 연구는 대구획으로 경지정리된 후 5년차인 1 ha의 논 및 4대강 주변의 리모델링 농경지 밭을 대상으로 하여 그에 따른 화학적 특성들을 조사하여 그 포장내의 공간변이를 파악하고 각 성분들간의 상호관련성을 비교하고자 수행되었다. 5년차인 1 ha의 논에서 5 m 간격으로 총 $20{\times}20=400$점의 시료를 채취하여 분석에 이용하였으며 매립적토형 인위토양은 10 m 간격으로 $6{\times}9=54$점의 시료를 채취하였다. 화학성분 중 pH, 유효인산, 유기물함량 등을 분석하여 그 결과를 해석하였다. pH는 구미지역에서 7.1로 높게 나타났으며, 유효인산 및 유기물함량의 경우 모두 변이계수가 높았으며 이는 한 포장 내에서도 상당히 불균일하다고 볼 수 있었다. 왜도(skewness)와 첨도(kurtosis) 등은 그 절대값으로 볼 때 거의 정규분포에 가까운 형태로 보이고 있다. 안성의 논에서는 유효인산 (72.8) ${\fallingdotseq}$ pH(73.8) < 유기물(159.3)의 순, 구미의 밭에서는 유기물(6.5) < 유효인산(33.5) < pH(46.6)의 순으로 Range값이 높아졌다. 이는 상대적으로 5년된 토양에서보다 0년차의 토양에서 시료채취를 많이 해야 한다는 의미로 해석할 수 있었다.

In this study, spatial analyses of chemical properties were studied to find inter-relation among these properties from 5 year old general paddy field after arable land rearrangement and remodeled paddy field near 4 river project. In addition, comparison of spatial variations between two paddy fields was performed to characterize paddy fields by different formation and provide interpretation of these variations and parameters (Semivariogram and Kriging) from spatial analyses. Total of 400 ($20{\times}20$) soil samples were taken at 5 m interval from 1 ha of 5 year old general paddy field and analyzed. Total number of 54 ($6{\times}9$) soil samples were taken from remodeled paddy fields at 10m interval for the analyses. The results of pH, available Phosphate and organic matter among the analyzed results were used for interpretation. The pH values were relatively high from Gumi region. The values of available Phosphate and organic matter showed greater variant coefficients and this represented that there were greater heterogeneity in available phosphate and organic matter distributions across one paddy field. The values of skewness and kurtosis as absolute values, showed almost normal distributions. The paddy field in Ansung had available Phosphate (72.8) ${\fallingdotseq}$ pH (73.8) and greater values of organic matter (159.3), while upland in Gumi had the range value of organic (6.5) < available Phosphate (33.5) < pH (46.6). Based on these results, younger soils (0 year old) require more sampling to characterize the whole field than 5 year old soils.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Lee, C. K. 2001. Mapping of field information and development of yield sensor for precision agriculture in paddy field. pH. D. Thesis. (In Korean)
  2. Lee, C.K., Y.K. Sonn, J.H. Sung, I.G. Jung, S.C. Kim, W.P. Park, and W.K. Park. 2002. Geostatistical analysis of spatial variability for field information in paddy field. Kor. J. Intl. Agri. 14(2):127-138.
  3. National Institute of Agricultural science and Technology (NIAST). 2000. Taxonomical classification of Korean soils.
  4. Park, C.S., J.J. Kim, and S.J. Cho. 1983. Analysis of spatial variability for infiltration rate of field soil. Korean J. Soil Sci. Fert. 16(4):305-310.
  5. Park, C.S., J.J. Kim, and S.J. Cho. 1984. Analysis of spatial variability for particle size distribution of field soils. Korean J. Soil Sci. Fert. 17(3):212-217.
  6. Park, C.S., S.C. Yang, G.J. Lee, J.T. Lee, H.M. Kim, S.H. Park, D.H. Kim, A. Y. Jung, and S.W. Hwang. 2006. Spatial variability of soil moisture content, soil penetration resistance and crop yield on the leveled upland in the reclaimed highland. Korean J. Soil Sci. Fert. 39(3):123-135.
  7. Park, M.E. 1987. Spatial variation analysis of soil charavteristics and crop growth. Seoul National Univ. pH. D. Thesis. (In Korean)
  8. Park, M.E. and S.H. Yoo. 1989. Spatial variation analysis of soil characteristics and crop growth across the land-partitioned boundary. Korean J. Soil Sci. Fert. 22(3):163-172.
  9. Robertson, G. P. 1998. Geostatistics for the environmental sciences, Gamma Design Software, Plainwell, Michigan.
  10. Sohn, Y.M., G.Y. Jeon, J.D. Song, J.H. Lee, and M.E. Park. 2009. Effect of spatial salinity variation on the emergence of soiling and forage crops seeded at the newly reclaimed tidal lands in Korea. Korean J. Soil Sci. Fert. 42(3):172-178.

피인용 문헌

  1. Differences in Spatial Variation of Soil Chemistry Between Natural and Anthropogenic Soils vol.47, pp.6, 2014, https://doi.org/10.7745/KJSSF.2014.47.6.418
  2. Spatial Analyses of Soil Chemical Properties from a Remodeled Paddy Field as Affected by Wet Land Leveling vol.49, pp.5, 2016, https://doi.org/10.7745/KJSSF.2016.49.5.555
  3. Comparison between natural and anthropogenic soils through fractal dimension analysis vol.41, pp.4, 2014, https://doi.org/10.7744/cnujas.2014.41.4.379
  4. Classification of Anthropogenic Soil "Ingwan" Series vol.48, pp.5, 2015, https://doi.org/10.7745/KJSSF.2015.48.5.535
  5. Soil Physico-chemical Properties by Land Use of Anthropogenic Soils Dredged from River Basins vol.49, pp.4, 2016, https://doi.org/10.7745/KJSSF.2016.49.4.341
  6. Computer Tomography as a Tool for Physical Analysis in an Anthropogenic Soil vol.46, pp.6, 2013, https://doi.org/10.7745/KJSSF.2013.46.6.549
  7. Comparison of Soil Pore Properties between Anthropogenic and Natural Paddy Field Soils From Computed Tomographic Images vol.48, pp.5, 2015, https://doi.org/10.7745/KJSSF.2015.48.5.351