Physical Therapy Korea (한국전문물리치료학회지)

Korean Research Society of Physical Therapy (한국전문물리치료학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The Effects of Activity and Family Support on the Participation Restriction of Chronic Stroke Patients

만성 뇌졸중 환자의 참여제한에 활동과 가족지지가 미치는 영향

  • 김원호 (울산과학대학교 물리치료과)
  • Received : 2012.01.06
  • Accepted : 2012.01.26
  • Published : 2012.02.19
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to identify the factors determining the participation restriction of chronic stroke patients based on international classification of functioning, disability, and health (ICF) model. Sixty-eight stroke patients participated. The participants were assessed participation restriction using the Korean version of London handicap scale (K-LHS), modified Barthel index (K-MBI) to measure activities of daily living, Berg balance scale (K-BBS) to assess balance, and the center for epidemiologic studies depression (K-CES-D) to gauge depression. Also, 3 minutes walking test (3MWT), gait velocity, asymmetric posture, and family support were assessed. A stepwise multiple regression analysis was used to explore the factors determining participation restriction. There were no significant different in the K-LHS and K-MBI results by gender (p>.05). Correlations between the K-LHS and K-MBI (r=-.656), K-BBS (r=-.543), K-CES-D (r=.266), 3MWT (r=-.363), gait velocity (r=.348), and family support (r=-.389) were significant (p<.05). Also, the K-MBI and family support were the factors that determined participation restriction (p<.05) and that 40.2% of the variation in the K-LHS can be explained. Therefore, it is suggested that evaluation and intervention of patient's activity level and extent of family support is necessary to reduce participation restriction of chronic stroke patients.

Keywords

References

  1. 강성규, 윤방부, 이혜리 등. 가족기능도지수(Family APGAR Scores)에 관한 기초조사 연구. 가정의학회지. 1984;5(12):6-13.
  2. 김원호, 박은영. 물리치료학 연구방법론. 서울, 정담미디어, 2010:49-50.
  3. 정한영, 박진희, 심재진 등. 한글화된 Berg 균형검사법의 신뢰도 분석. 대한재활의학회지. 2006;30(6):611-618.
  4. 정한영, 박병규, 신희석 등. 한글판 수정바델지수 (K-MBI)의 개발: 뇌졸중 환자 대상의 다기관 연구. 대한재활의학회지. 2007;31(3):283-297.
  5. 정혜영, 김경미, 장문영. 뇌졸중 환자의 작업치료 중재 결과를 측정하기 위해 사용된 평가도구에 관한 체계적 고찰. 대한작업치료학회지. 2009;17(3):79-95.
  6. 최유임, 김원호, 박은영. 한국어판 London Handicap Scale의 타당도와 신뢰도. 한국산학기술학회지. 2011;12(11):5102-5019.
  7. Berg K, Wood-Dauphinee S, Williams JI, et al. Measuring balance in the elderly: Preliminary development of an instrument. Physiother Can. 1989;41(6):304-311. https://doi.org/10.3138/ptc.41.6.304
  8. Chau JP, Thompson DR, Twinn S, et al. Determinants of participation restriction among community dwelling stroke survivors: A path analysis. BMC Neurol. 2009;9:49. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2377-9-49
  9. Chon KK, Rhee MK. Preliminary development of Korean version of CES-D. Korean J Clin Psychol. 1992;11(1):65-76.
  10. Clarke PJ, Black SE, Badley EM, et al. Handicap in stroke survivors. Disabil Rehabil. 1999;21(3):116-123. https://doi.org/10.1080/096382899297855
  11. D'Alisa S, Baudo S, Mauro A, et al. How does stroke restrict participation in long-term post-stroke survivors? Acta Neurol Scand. 2005;112(3):157-162. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0404.2005.00466.x
  12. Desrosiers J, Noreau L, Rochette A, et al. Predictors of long-term participation after stroke. Disabil Rehabil. 2006;28(4):221-230. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638280500158372
  13. Eng JJ, Chu KS, Dawson AS, et al. Functional walk tests in individuals with stroke: Relation to perceived exertion and myocardial exertion. Stroke. 2002;33(3):756-761. https://doi.org/10.1161/hs0302.104195
  14. Gadidi V, Katz-Leurer M, Carmeli E, et al. Long-term outcome poststroke: Predictors of activity limitation and participation restriction. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2011;92(11):1802-1808. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2011.06.014
  15. Goonetilleke A. Validity of the London handicap scale. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1995;58(1):125-126.
  16. Granger CV, Albrecht GL, Hamilton BB. Outcome of comprehensive medical rehabilitation: Measurement by PULSES profile and the Barthel Index. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1979;60(4):145-154.
  17. Green J, Forster A, Young J. Reliability of gait speed measured by a timed walking test in patients one year after stroke. Clin Rehabil. 2002;16(3):306-314. https://doi.org/10.1191/0269215502cr495oa
  18. Gurr B. Stroke mood screening on an inpatient stroke unit. Br J Nurs. 2011;20(2):94-99. https://doi.org/10.12968/bjon.2011.20.2.94
  19. Hajek VE, Gagnon S, Ruderman JE. Cognitive and functional assessments of stroke patients: An analysis of their relation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1997;78(12):1331-1337. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-9993(97)90306-3
  20. Hamzat TK, Peters GO. Motor function and participation among Nigerian stroke survivors: 6-month follow-up study. NeuroRehabilitation. 2009;25(2):137-142.
  21. Hartman-Maeir A, Soroker N, Ring H, et al. Activities, participation and satisfaction one-year post stroke. Disabil Rehabil. 2007;29(7):559-566. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638280600924996
  22. Harwood RH, Ebrahim S. Measuring the outcomes of day hospital attendance: A comparison of the Barthel Index and London Handicap Scale. Clin Rehabil. 2000;14(5):527-531. https://doi.org/10.1191/0269215500cr346oa
  23. Harwood RH, Gompertz P, Ebrahim S. Handicap one year after a stroke: Validity of a new scale. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1994;57(7):825-829. https://doi.org/10.1136/jnnp.57.7.825
  24. Harwood RH, Gompertz P, Pound P, et al. Determinants of handicap 1 and 3 years after a stroke. Disabil Rehabil. 1997;19(5):205-211. https://doi.org/10.3109/09638289709166528
  25. Hershkovitz A, Beloosesky Y, Brill S, et al. Is a day hospital rehabilitation programme associated with reduction of handicap in stroke patients? Clin Rehabil. 2004;18(3):261-266. https://doi.org/10.1191/0269215504cr731oa
  26. Iriberri M, Gáldiz JB, Gorostiza A, et al. Comparison of the distances covered during 3 and 6 min walking test. Respir Med. 2002;96(10):812-816. https://doi.org/10.1053/rmed.2002.1363
  27. Jenkinson C, Mant J, Carter J, et al. The London handicap scale: A re-evaluation of its validity using standard scoring and simple summation. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2000;68(3):365-367. https://doi.org/10.1136/jnnp.68.3.365
  28. Kim WH, Park EY. Causal relation between spasticity, strength, gross motor function, and functional outcome in children with cerebral palsy: A path analysis. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2011;53(1):68-73.
  29. King RB. Quality of life after stroke. Stroke. 1996;27(9):1467-1472. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.STR.27.9.1467
  30. Kneebone II, Dunmore E. Psychological management of post-stroke depression. Br J Clin Psychol. 2000;39(Pt 1):53-65. https://doi.org/10.1348/014466500163103
  31. Kwok T, Jin X, Yeung F, et al. A comparison of the long-term health related quality of life and handicap of stroke patients in Mainland China and Hong Kong. Health Services Insights. 2010;3:13-20.
  32. Kwok T, Lo RS, Wong E, et al. Quality of life of stroke survivors: A 1-year follow-up study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2006;87(9):1177-1182. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2006.05.015
  33. LeBrasseur NK, Sayers SP, Ouellette MM, et al. Muscle impairments and behavioral factors mediate functional limitations and disability following stroke. Phys Ther. 2006;86(10):1342-1350. https://doi.org/10.2522/ptj.20050162
  34. Lo RS, Cheng JO, Wong EM, et al. Handicap and its determinants of change in stroke survivors: One-year follow-up study. Stroke. 2008;39(1):148-153. https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.107.491399
  35. Lord SE, Halligan PW, Wade DT. Visual gait analysis: The development of a clinical assessment and scale. Clin Rehabil. 1998;12(2):107-119. https://doi.org/10.1191/026921598666182531
  36. Maeshima S, Ueyoshi A, Osawa A, et al. Mobility and muscle strength contralateral to hemiplegia from stroke: Benefit from self-training with family support. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2003;82(6):456-462.
  37. Mandich AD, Polatajko HJ, Rodger S. Rites of passage: Understanding participation of children with developmental coordination disorder. Hum Mov Sci. 2003;22(4-5):583-595. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.humov.2003.09.011
  38. Mercier L, Audet T, Hébert R, et al. Impact of motor, cognitive, and perceptual disorders on ability to perform activities of daily living after stroke. Stroke. 2001;32(11):2602-2608. https://doi.org/10.1161/hs1101.098154
  39. O'Sullivan SB, Schmitz TJ. Physical Rehabilitation. 5th ed. Philadelphia, F.A. Davis Co., 2006:718-726.
  40. Patel M, Coshall C, Rudd AG, et al. Natural history of cognitive impairment after stroke and factors associated with its recovery. Clin Rehabil. 2003;17(2):158-166. https://doi.org/10.1191/0269215503cr596oa
  41. Perenboom RJ, Chorus AM. Measuring participation according to the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF). Disabil Rehabil. 2003;25(11-12):577-587. https://doi.org/10.1080/0963828031000137081
  42. Plante M, Demers L, Swaine B, et al. Association between daily activities following stroke rehabilitation and social role functioning upon return to the community. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2010;17(1):47-57. https://doi.org/10.1310/tsr1701-47
  43. Poulin V, Desrosiers J. Participation after stroke: Comparing proxies' and patients' perceptions. J Rehabil Med. 2008;40(1):28-35. https://doi.org/10.2340/16501977-0115
  44. Quinn L, Gordon J. Documentation for Rehabilitation: A guide to clinical decision making. 2nd ed. Canada, Saunders, 2009:75-78.
  45. Radloff LS. The CES-D scale: A self-report depression scale for research in the general population. Appl Psychol Meas 1977;1(3):385-401. https://doi.org/10.1177/014662167700100306
  46. Salter KL, Foley NC, Jutai JW, et al. Assessment of participation outcomes in randomized controlled trials of stroke rehabilitation interventions. Int J Rehabil Res. 2007;30(4):339-342. https://doi.org/10.1097/MRR.0b013e3282f144b7
  47. Seki M, Takahashi H, Chino N. Characteristics of hemiplegic outpatients with stroke who try to remove their clothes unnecessarily. Gan To Kagaku Ryoho. 2001;28(1):71-74.
  48. Smilkstein G, Ashworth C, Montano D. Validity and reliability of the family APGAR as a test of family function. J Fam Pract. 1982;15(2):303-311.
  49. Studenski S. Bradypedia: Is gait speed ready for clinical use? J Nutr Health Aging. 2009;13(10):878-880. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12603-009-0245-0
  50. Sturm JW, Dewey HM, Donnan GA, et al. Handicap after stroke: How does it relate to disability, perception of recovery, and stroke subtype?: The north North East Melbourne Stroke Incidence Study (NEMESIS). Stroke. 2002;33(3):762-768. https://doi.org/10.1161/hs0302.103815
  51. Sturm JW, Donnan GA, Dewey HM, et al. Determinants of handicap after stroke: The North East Melbourne Stroke Incidence Study (NEMESIS). Stroke. 2004;35(3):715-720. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.STR.0000117573.19022.66
  52. van Brakel WH, Anderson AM, Mutatkar RK, et al. The participation scale: Measuring a key concept in pubic health. Disabil Rehabil. 2006;28(4):193-203. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638280500192785
  53. Verbrugge LM, Jette AM. The disablement process. Soc Sci Med. 1994;38(1):1-14. https://doi.org/10.1016/0277-9536(94)90294-1
  54. Westergren A, Hagell P. Initial validation of the Swedish version of the London Handicap Scale. Qual Life Res. 2006;15(7):1251-1256. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-006-0054-4
  55. White JH, Alston MK, Marquez JL, et al. Community-dwelling stroke survivors: Function is not the whole story with quality of life. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2007;88(9):1140-1146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2007.06.003
  56. Whiteneck GG, Charlifue SW, Gerhart KA, et al. Quantifying handicap: A new measure of long-term rehabilitation outcomes. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1992;73(6):519-526.
  57. Woo J, Yuen YK, Kay R, et al. Survival, disability, and residence 20 months after acute stroke in a Chinese population: Implications for community care. Disabil Rehabil. 1992;14(1):36-40. https://doi.org/10.3109/09638289209166425
  58. World Health Organization. International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health. 1st ed. World Health Organization, Geneva. 2001:3-18.

Cited by

  1. The Validity, Reliability and Discriminative Index of the Korean Version of Modified Barthel Index(K-MBI) in Stroke Patients vol.13, pp.9, 2012, https://doi.org/10.5762/KAIS.2012.13.9.4119
  2. Reliability and Validity of Craig Handicap Assessment and Reporting Technique-Korean(CHART-K) for Patients With Spinal Cord Injury vol.26, pp.3, 2018, https://doi.org/10.14519/jksot.2018.26.3.03
  3. 뇌졸중 환자의 사회 참여에 영향을 미치는 요인 vol.18, pp.6, 2012, https://doi.org/10.5762/kais.2017.18.6.165
  4. Socioeconomic Factors of Mobility among People with Disabilities: A Study Using the National Survey of the Disabled Persons and Geo-location Data vol.28, pp.3, 2012, https://doi.org/10.15707/disem.2018.28.3.003
  5. Activity Levels and Life Satisfaction of Stroke Patients in a Local Community According to Cognitive and Physical Functions vol.27, pp.1, 2012, https://doi.org/10.14519/kjot.2019.27.1.04