• Title/Summary/Keyword: London handicap scale

Search Result 2, Processing Time 0.015 seconds

Validity and Reliability of the Korean Version of the London Handicap Scale (한국판 London Handicap Scale의 타당도와 신뢰도)

  • Choi, Yoo-Im;Kim, Won-Ho;Park, Eun-Young
    • Journal of the Korea Academia-Industrial cooperation Society
    • /
    • v.12 no.11
    • /
    • pp.5102-5109
    • /
    • 2011
  • The purpose of the this study was to identify validity and reliability of the Korean version of the London Handicap Scale (K-LHS) measuring participation restriction for stroke survivors within outpatient rehabilitation setting. 54 stroke patients participated. The reliability was good with a Cronbach's ${\alpha}$ and intraclass correlation coefficient of .791 and .983, respectively. The results of exploratory factor analysis was that the K-LHS was constructed two factors and explanation power was 72.32%. There are significant correlation between K-MBI and subitems of K-LHS (r=-.454 ~ -.819)(p<.01), except economic item. Because the K-LHS seems to be a valid and reliable, thus, it is considered to be appropriate as a tool to measure participation restriction of stroke patients in clinical practice.

The Effects of Activity and Family Support on the Participation Restriction of Chronic Stroke Patients (만성 뇌졸중 환자의 참여제한에 활동과 가족지지가 미치는 영향)

  • Kim, Won-Ho
    • Physical Therapy Korea
    • /
    • v.19 no.1
    • /
    • pp.76-85
    • /
    • 2012
  • The purpose of this study was to identify the factors determining the participation restriction of chronic stroke patients based on international classification of functioning, disability, and health (ICF) model. Sixty-eight stroke patients participated. The participants were assessed participation restriction using the Korean version of London handicap scale (K-LHS), modified Barthel index (K-MBI) to measure activities of daily living, Berg balance scale (K-BBS) to assess balance, and the center for epidemiologic studies depression (K-CES-D) to gauge depression. Also, 3 minutes walking test (3MWT), gait velocity, asymmetric posture, and family support were assessed. A stepwise multiple regression analysis was used to explore the factors determining participation restriction. There were no significant different in the K-LHS and K-MBI results by gender (p>.05). Correlations between the K-LHS and K-MBI (r=-.656), K-BBS (r=-.543), K-CES-D (r=.266), 3MWT (r=-.363), gait velocity (r=.348), and family support (r=-.389) were significant (p<.05). Also, the K-MBI and family support were the factors that determined participation restriction (p<.05) and that 40.2% of the variation in the K-LHS can be explained. Therefore, it is suggested that evaluation and intervention of patient's activity level and extent of family support is necessary to reduce participation restriction of chronic stroke patients.