Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.12674/ptk.2012.19.1.076

The Effects of Activity and Family Support on the Participation Restriction of Chronic Stroke Patients  

Kim, Won-Ho (Dept. of Physical Therapy, Ulsan College)
Publication Information
Physical Therapy Korea / v.19, no.1, 2012 , pp. 76-85 More about this Journal
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to identify the factors determining the participation restriction of chronic stroke patients based on international classification of functioning, disability, and health (ICF) model. Sixty-eight stroke patients participated. The participants were assessed participation restriction using the Korean version of London handicap scale (K-LHS), modified Barthel index (K-MBI) to measure activities of daily living, Berg balance scale (K-BBS) to assess balance, and the center for epidemiologic studies depression (K-CES-D) to gauge depression. Also, 3 minutes walking test (3MWT), gait velocity, asymmetric posture, and family support were assessed. A stepwise multiple regression analysis was used to explore the factors determining participation restriction. There were no significant different in the K-LHS and K-MBI results by gender (p>.05). Correlations between the K-LHS and K-MBI (r=-.656), K-BBS (r=-.543), K-CES-D (r=.266), 3MWT (r=-.363), gait velocity (r=.348), and family support (r=-.389) were significant (p<.05). Also, the K-MBI and family support were the factors that determined participation restriction (p<.05) and that 40.2% of the variation in the K-LHS can be explained. Therefore, it is suggested that evaluation and intervention of patient's activity level and extent of family support is necessary to reduce participation restriction of chronic stroke patients.
Keywords
London handicap scale; Participation; Stroke;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 1  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Eng JJ, Chu KS, Dawson AS, et al. Functional walk tests in individuals with stroke: Relation to perceived exertion and myocardial exertion. Stroke. 2002;33(3):756-761.   DOI
2 Gadidi V, Katz-Leurer M, Carmeli E, et al. Long-term outcome poststroke: Predictors of activity limitation and participation restriction. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2011;92(11):1802-1808.   DOI
3 Goonetilleke A. Validity of the London handicap scale. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1995;58(1):125-126.
4 Granger CV, Albrecht GL, Hamilton BB. Outcome of comprehensive medical rehabilitation: Measurement by PULSES profile and the Barthel Index. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1979;60(4):145-154.
5 Green J, Forster A, Young J. Reliability of gait speed measured by a timed walking test in patients one year after stroke. Clin Rehabil. 2002;16(3):306-314.   DOI   ScienceOn
6 Gurr B. Stroke mood screening on an inpatient stroke unit. Br J Nurs. 2011;20(2):94-99.   DOI
7 Hajek VE, Gagnon S, Ruderman JE. Cognitive and functional assessments of stroke patients: An analysis of their relation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1997;78(12):1331-1337.   DOI
8 Hamzat TK, Peters GO. Motor function and participation among Nigerian stroke survivors: 6-month follow-up study. NeuroRehabilitation. 2009;25(2):137-142.
9 Hartman-Maeir A, Soroker N, Ring H, et al. Activities, participation and satisfaction one-year post stroke. Disabil Rehabil. 2007;29(7):559-566.   DOI
10 Harwood RH, Ebrahim S. Measuring the outcomes of day hospital attendance: A comparison of the Barthel Index and London Handicap Scale. Clin Rehabil. 2000;14(5):527-531.   DOI
11 Harwood RH, Gompertz P, Ebrahim S. Handicap one year after a stroke: Validity of a new scale. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1994;57(7):825-829.   DOI
12 Harwood RH, Gompertz P, Pound P, et al. Determinants of handicap 1 and 3 years after a stroke. Disabil Rehabil. 1997;19(5):205-211.   DOI
13 Hershkovitz A, Beloosesky Y, Brill S, et al. Is a day hospital rehabilitation programme associated with reduction of handicap in stroke patients? Clin Rehabil. 2004;18(3):261-266.   DOI
14 Iriberri M, Gáldiz JB, Gorostiza A, et al. Comparison of the distances covered during 3 and 6 min walking test. Respir Med. 2002;96(10):812-816.   DOI
15 Jenkinson C, Mant J, Carter J, et al. The London handicap scale: A re-evaluation of its validity using standard scoring and simple summation. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2000;68(3):365-367.   DOI
16 Kim WH, Park EY. Causal relation between spasticity, strength, gross motor function, and functional outcome in children with cerebral palsy: A path analysis. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2011;53(1):68-73.
17 King RB. Quality of life after stroke. Stroke. 1996;27(9):1467-1472.   DOI
18 Kneebone II, Dunmore E. Psychological management of post-stroke depression. Br J Clin Psychol. 2000;39(Pt 1):53-65.   DOI
19 Kwok T, Jin X, Yeung F, et al. A comparison of the long-term health related quality of life and handicap of stroke patients in Mainland China and Hong Kong. Health Services Insights. 2010;3:13-20.
20 Kwok T, Lo RS, Wong E, et al. Quality of life of stroke survivors: A 1-year follow-up study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2006;87(9):1177-1182.   DOI
21 LeBrasseur NK, Sayers SP, Ouellette MM, et al. Muscle impairments and behavioral factors mediate functional limitations and disability following stroke. Phys Ther. 2006;86(10):1342-1350.   DOI
22 Lo RS, Cheng JO, Wong EM, et al. Handicap and its determinants of change in stroke survivors: One-year follow-up study. Stroke. 2008;39(1):148-153.   DOI
23 Lord SE, Halligan PW, Wade DT. Visual gait analysis: The development of a clinical assessment and scale. Clin Rehabil. 1998;12(2):107-119.   DOI
24 Maeshima S, Ueyoshi A, Osawa A, et al. Mobility and muscle strength contralateral to hemiplegia from stroke: Benefit from self-training with family support. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2003;82(6):456-462.
25 Mandich AD, Polatajko HJ, Rodger S. Rites of passage: Understanding participation of children with developmental coordination disorder. Hum Mov Sci. 2003;22(4-5):583-595.   DOI
26 Mercier L, Audet T, Hébert R, et al. Impact of motor, cognitive, and perceptual disorders on ability to perform activities of daily living after stroke. Stroke. 2001;32(11):2602-2608.   DOI
27 O'Sullivan SB, Schmitz TJ. Physical Rehabilitation. 5th ed. Philadelphia, F.A. Davis Co., 2006:718-726.
28 Patel M, Coshall C, Rudd AG, et al. Natural history of cognitive impairment after stroke and factors associated with its recovery. Clin Rehabil. 2003;17(2):158-166.   DOI
29 Perenboom RJ, Chorus AM. Measuring participation according to the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF). Disabil Rehabil. 2003;25(11-12):577-587.   DOI
30 Plante M, Demers L, Swaine B, et al. Association between daily activities following stroke rehabilitation and social role functioning upon return to the community. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2010;17(1):47-57.   DOI
31 Poulin V, Desrosiers J. Participation after stroke: Comparing proxies' and patients' perceptions. J Rehabil Med. 2008;40(1):28-35.   DOI
32 Quinn L, Gordon J. Documentation for Rehabilitation: A guide to clinical decision making. 2nd ed. Canada, Saunders, 2009:75-78.
33 Radloff LS. The CES-D scale: A self-report depression scale for research in the general population. Appl Psychol Meas 1977;1(3):385-401.   DOI
34 Salter KL, Foley NC, Jutai JW, et al. Assessment of participation outcomes in randomized controlled trials of stroke rehabilitation interventions. Int J Rehabil Res. 2007;30(4):339-342.   DOI
35 Seki M, Takahashi H, Chino N. Characteristics of hemiplegic outpatients with stroke who try to remove their clothes unnecessarily. Gan To Kagaku Ryoho. 2001;28(1):71-74.
36 Smilkstein G, Ashworth C, Montano D. Validity and reliability of the family APGAR as a test of family function. J Fam Pract. 1982;15(2):303-311.
37 Studenski S. Bradypedia: Is gait speed ready for clinical use? J Nutr Health Aging. 2009;13(10):878-880.   DOI
38 Sturm JW, Dewey HM, Donnan GA, et al. Handicap after stroke: How does it relate to disability, perception of recovery, and stroke subtype?: The north North East Melbourne Stroke Incidence Study (NEMESIS). Stroke. 2002;33(3):762-768.   DOI
39 Sturm JW, Donnan GA, Dewey HM, et al. Determinants of handicap after stroke: The North East Melbourne Stroke Incidence Study (NEMESIS). Stroke. 2004;35(3):715-720.   DOI
40 van Brakel WH, Anderson AM, Mutatkar RK, et al. The participation scale: Measuring a key concept in pubic health. Disabil Rehabil. 2006;28(4):193-203.   DOI
41 Verbrugge LM, Jette AM. The disablement process. Soc Sci Med. 1994;38(1):1-14.   DOI
42 Westergren A, Hagell P. Initial validation of the Swedish version of the London Handicap Scale. Qual Life Res. 2006;15(7):1251-1256.   DOI
43 White JH, Alston MK, Marquez JL, et al. Community-dwelling stroke survivors: Function is not the whole story with quality of life. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2007;88(9):1140-1146.   DOI   ScienceOn
44 Whiteneck GG, Charlifue SW, Gerhart KA, et al. Quantifying handicap: A new measure of long-term rehabilitation outcomes. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1992;73(6):519-526.
45 Woo J, Yuen YK, Kay R, et al. Survival, disability, and residence 20 months after acute stroke in a Chinese population: Implications for community care. Disabil Rehabil. 1992;14(1):36-40.   DOI
46 World Health Organization. International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health. 1st ed. World Health Organization, Geneva. 2001:3-18.
47 정한영, 박병규, 신희석 등. 한글판 수정바델지수 (K-MBI)의 개발: 뇌졸중 환자 대상의 다기관 연구. 대한재활의학회지. 2007;31(3):283-297.
48 강성규, 윤방부, 이혜리 등. 가족기능도지수(Family APGAR Scores)에 관한 기초조사 연구. 가정의학회지. 1984;5(12):6-13.
49 김원호, 박은영. 물리치료학 연구방법론. 서울, 정담미디어, 2010:49-50.
50 정한영, 박진희, 심재진 등. 한글화된 Berg 균형검사법의 신뢰도 분석. 대한재활의학회지. 2006;30(6):611-618.
51 정혜영, 김경미, 장문영. 뇌졸중 환자의 작업치료 중재 결과를 측정하기 위해 사용된 평가도구에 관한 체계적 고찰. 대한작업치료학회지. 2009;17(3):79-95.
52 최유임, 김원호, 박은영. 한국어판 London Handicap Scale의 타당도와 신뢰도. 한국산학기술학회지. 2011;12(11):5102-5019.
53 Berg K, Wood-Dauphinee S, Williams JI, et al. Measuring balance in the elderly: Preliminary development of an instrument. Physiother Can. 1989;41(6):304-311.   DOI
54 Chau JP, Thompson DR, Twinn S, et al. Determinants of participation restriction among community dwelling stroke survivors: A path analysis. BMC Neurol. 2009;9:49.   DOI
55 Chon KK, Rhee MK. Preliminary development of Korean version of CES-D. Korean J Clin Psychol. 1992;11(1):65-76.
56 Clarke PJ, Black SE, Badley EM, et al. Handicap in stroke survivors. Disabil Rehabil. 1999;21(3):116-123.   DOI
57 D'Alisa S, Baudo S, Mauro A, et al. How does stroke restrict participation in long-term post-stroke survivors? Acta Neurol Scand. 2005;112(3):157-162.   DOI
58 Desrosiers J, Noreau L, Rochette A, et al. Predictors of long-term participation after stroke. Disabil Rehabil. 2006;28(4):221-230.   DOI