DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

수자원 개발사업 주민의견 유형분석을 통한 환경영향평가 개선방안

Reformation Methods of Environmental Impact Assessment in Water Resources Development Project by Examining Local Resident Opinions

  • 투고 : 2010.09.01
  • 심사 : 2011.05.13
  • 발행 : 2011.06.30

초록

This study was carried out for improving the effectiveness of water resources development project through local resident opinions in the environmental impact assessment(EIA). The EIA reports of seven dams were examined. Four dams -Youngju Dam, Seongduck Dam, Buhang Dam and Hantangang Dam- which included many local opinions including 470 opinions of 341 local residents were selected to be analyzed. Local residents submitted their opinions in the six fields which are meteorological phenomena, water quality, land use, fauna and flora, noise and vibration, and residence, and the major opinions of those opinions came from the atmosphere environment field which is 32% of total opinions and social and economic field which is 38% of total opinions, respectively. In submerged area, opinions of the measure for migration and compensation were 91% and in non-submerged area, opinions of the measure for meteorological phenomena was 86%. Those percentages were maximum in each area. Opinions concerned meteorological phenomena were 86% and 53% in Youngju Dam and Seongduck Dam where area is surrounded by existing dam, but there was only 9% and 0% of opinions in Buhang Dam and Hantangang Dam where area is without existing dam nearby. The reformation methods which reflected the resident's opinions were suggested on EIA in dam development projects. First of all, reliability and objectivity of the field of meteorological phenoma should be enhanced by scientific prediction of the phenomenon days. Secondly, techniques reducing uncertainty of various water quality prediction models ought to be developed and effectiveness of the reduction strategies in environmental impact should be quantified. Finally, the draft of EIA report should involve the detailed plans of migration and compensation's procedures, criteria and measures to support.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. 박재충, 최재훈, 송영일, 송상진, 서동일, 2010, HSPF, EFDC 및 WASP에 의한 영주다목 적댐 저수지의 수질예측, 환경영향평가, 19(5), 465-473.
  2. 반영운, 주경선, 정헌근, 황규환, 2010, 전문가 설문 조사를 통한 환경영향평가서 작성 및 협의 절차 개선방안, 환경영향평가, 19(2), 141-151.
  3. 유헌석, 주용준, 정성훈, 2002, 환경영향평가상의 효율적 주민의견 수렴에 관한 연구, 환경영향평가, 11(3), 311-319.
  4. 이승호, 허인혜, 2003, 대형 댐 건설이 주변 지역의 안개 특성에 미친 영향 -주암댐과 충주댐을 사례로, 환경영향평가, 12(2), 109-120.
  5. 전병일, 김일곤, 이영미, 2002, 낙동강 수계 중의댐 건설에 의한 주변의 국지기상환경 변화: I. 댐 건설 전.후의 기상변화 분석, 한국환경과학회지, 11(3), 161-168.
  6. 정병길, 2009, 우리나라 환경영향평가제도의 문제점 및 개선방안에 관한 소고, 공법학연구, 10(2), 327-349.
  7. 한국수자원공사, 2001, 한탄강댐 환경영향평가서, 13-525.
  8. 한국수자원공사, 2004a, 성덕다목적댐 건설사업 환경영향평가서, 1170.
  9. 한국수자원공사, 2004b, 부항(감천)다목적댐 건설사업 환경영향평가서, 1350.
  10. 한국수자원공사, 2009a, 영주다목적댐 건설사업 환경영향평가서(초안), 941.
  11. 한국수자원공사, 2009b, 영주다목적댐 건설사업 환경영향평가서, 1435.
  12. 한국수자원공사, 2009c, 영주다목적댐 건설사업 환경영향평가서(보완), 26.
  13. 홍형표, 2004, 댐 개발의 문제점 및 개선방안, 한국수자원학회지, 37(4), 22-28.
  14. 환경부, 2009, 환경영향평가법 해설, 4-5.