DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Labial and lingual/palatal bone thickness of maxillary and mandibular anteriors in human cadavers in Koreans

  • Han, Ji-Young (Division of Periodontology, Department of Dentistry, Hanyang University College of Medicine) ;
  • Jung, Gyu-Un (Division of Periodontology, Department of Dentistry, Hanyang University College of Medicine)
  • Received : 2010.11.23
  • Accepted : 2011.02.05
  • Published : 2011.04.30

Abstract

Purpose: The aim of this study is to evaluate the buccal and lingual bone thickness in the anterior teeth and the relationship between bone thickness and the tissue biotype. Methods: Three male and two female human cadaver heads (mean age, 55.4 years) were used in this study. First, the biotype of periodontium was evaluated and categorized into a thick or a thin group. Next, full thickness reflections of the mandible and the maxilla to expose the underlying bone for accurate measurements in the anterior regions were performed. After the removal of the half of the alveolar bone, the probe with a stopper was used to measure the thickness of bone plate at the alveolar crest (AC), 3 mm apical to the alveolar crest (AC-3), 6 mm apical to the alveolar crest (AC-6), and 9 mm apical to the alveolar crest (AC-9). The thickness of the buccal plates at the alveolar crest were $0.97{\pm}0.18\;mm$,$0.78{\pm}0.21\;mm$, and $0.95{\pm}0.35\;mm$ in the maxillary central incisors, lateral incisors, and canines, respectively. The thickness of the labial plates at the alveolar crest were $0.86{\pm}0.59\;mm$, $0.88{\pm}0.70\;mm$, and $1.17{\pm}0.70\;mm$ in the mandibular central incisors, lateral incisors and canines, respectively. Conclusions: The thickness of the labial plate in the maxillary anteriors is very thin that great caution is needed for placing an implant. The present study showed the bone thickness of maxillary and mandibular anteriors at different positions. Therefore, these data can be useful for the understanding of the bone thickness of the anteriors and a successful implant placement.

Keywords

References

  1. Blanes RJ, Bernard JP, Blanes ZM, Belser UC. A 10-year prospective study of ITI dental implants placed in the posterior region. II: influence of the crown-to-implant ratio and different prosthetic treatment modalities on crestal bone loss. Clin Oral Implants Res 2007;18:707-14. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2006.01307.x
  2. Tolstunov L. Implant zones of the jaws: implant location and related success rate. J Oral Implantol 2007;33:211-20. https://doi.org/10.1563/1548-1336(2007)33[211:IZOTJI]2.0.CO;2
  3. Evans CD, Chen ST. Esthetic outcomes of immediate implant placements. Clin Oral Implants Res 2008;19:73-80.
  4. Lazzara RJ. Immediate implant placement into extraction sites: surgical and restorative advantages. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 1989;9:332-43.
  5. Kan JY, Rungcharassaeng K, Umezu K, Kois JC. Dimensions of peri-implant mucosa: an evaluation of maxillary anterior single implants in humans. J Periodontol 2003;74:557-62. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2003.74.4.557
  6. Chen ST, Darby IB, Reynolds EC. A prospective clinical study of non-submerged immediate implants: clinical outcomes and esthetic results. Clin Oral Implants Res 2007;18:552-62. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2007.01388.x
  7. Wheeler SL, Vogel RE, Casellini R. Tissue preservation and maintenance of optimum esthetics: a clinical report. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2000;15:265-71.
  8. Becker BE, Becker W, Ricci A, Geurs N. A prospective clinical trial of endosseous screw-shaped implants placed at the time of tooth extraction without augmentation. J Periodontol 1998;69:920-6. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.1998.69.8.920
  9. Paolantonio M, Dolci M, Scarano A, d'Archivio D, di Placido G, Tumini V, et al. Immediate implantation in fresh extraction sockets. A controlled clinical and histological study in man. J Periodontol 2001;72:1560-71. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2001.72.11.1560
  10. Araujo MG, Lindhe J. Dimensional ridge alterations following tooth extraction. An experimental study in the dog. J Clin Periodontol 2005;32:212-8. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.2005.00642.x
  11. Araujo MG, Sukekava F, Wennstrom JL, Lindhe J. Ridge alterations following implant placement in fresh extraction sockets: an experimental study in the dog. J Clin Periodontol 2005;32:645-52. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.2005.00726.x
  12. Araujo MG, Wennstrom JL, Lindhe J. Modeling of the buccal and lingual bone walls of fresh extraction sites following implant installation. Clin Oral Implants Res 2006;17:606-14. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2006.01315.x
  13. Botticelli D, Berglundh T, Lindhe J. The influence of a biomaterial on the closure of a marginal hard tissue defect adjacent to implants. An experimental study in the dog. Clin Oral Implants Res 2004;15:285-92. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1600-0501.2003.01008.x
  14. Botticelli D, Persson LG, Lindhe J, Berglundh T. Bone tissue formation adjacent to implants placed in fresh extraction sockets: an experimental study in dogs. Clin Oral Implants Res 2006;17:351-8. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2006.01270.x
  15. Becker W, Goldstein M, Becker BE, Sennerby L. Minimally invasive flapless implant surgery: a prospective multicenter study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2005;7 Suppl 1:S21-7. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8208.2005.tb00071.x
  16. Schwartz-Arad D, Chaushu G. Immediate implant placement: a procedure without incisions. J Periodontol 1998;69:743-50. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.1998.69.7.743
  17. Chen ST, Darby IB, Reynolds EC, Clement JG. Immediate implant placement postextraction without flap elevation. J Periodontol 2009;80:163-72. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2009.080243
  18. Buser D, Martin W, Belser UC. Optimizing esthetics for implant restorations in the anterior maxilla: anatomic and surgical considerations. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2004;19 Suppl:43-61.
  19. Grunder U, Gracis S, Capelli M. Influence of the 3-D bone-to-implant relationship on esthetics. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2005;25:113-9.
  20. Ferrus J, Cecchinato D, Pjetursson EB, Lang NP, Sanz M, Lindhe J. Factors influencing ridge alterations following immediate implant placement into extraction sockets. Clin Oral Implants Res 2010;21:22-9. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2009.01825.x
  21. Katranji A, Misch K, Wang HL. Cortical bone thickness in dentate and edentulous human cadavers. J Periodontol 2007;78:874-8. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2007.060342
  22. Kan JY, Morimoto T, Rungcharassaeng K, Roe P, Smith DH. Gingival biotype assessment in the esthetic zone: visual versus direct measurement. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2010;30:237-43.
  23. Araujo MG, Sukekava F, Wennstrom JL, Lindhe J. Tissue modeling following implant placement in fresh extraction sockets. Clin Oral Implants Res 2006;17:615-24. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2006.01317.x
  24. Pennel BM, King KO, Wilderman MN, Barron JM. Repair of the alveolar process following osseous surgery. J Periodontol 1967;38:426-31. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.1967.38.5.426
  25. Wilderman MN, Pennel BM, King K, Barron JM. Histogenesis of repair following osseous surgery. J Periodontol 1970;41:551-65. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.1970.41.10.551
  26. Kan JY, Rungcharassaeng K, Lozada JL. Bilaminar subepithelial connective tissue grafts for immediate implant placement and provisionalization in the esthetic zone. J Calif Dent Assoc 2005;33:865-71.
  27. Fickl S, Zuhr O, Wachtel H, Bolz W, Huerzeler M. Tissue alterations after tooth extraction with and without surgical trauma: a volumetric study in the beagle dog. J Clin Periodontol 2008;35:356-63. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.2008.01209.x
  28. Araujo MG, Lindhe J. Ridge alterations following tooth extraction with and without flap elevation: an experimental study in the dog. Clin Oral Implants Res 2009;20:545-9.

Cited by

  1. Three-Dimensional Evaluation of Alveolar Bone and Soft Tissue Dimensions of Maxillary Central Incisors for Immediate Implant Placement: A Cone-Beam Computed Tomography Assisted Analysis. vol.24, pp.4, 2011, https://doi.org/10.1097/id.0000000000000259
  2. Assessment of buccal bone thickness of aesthetic maxillary region: a cone-beam computed tomography study vol.45, pp.5, 2011, https://doi.org/10.5051/jpis.2015.45.5.162
  3. Buccal Bone Thickness Overlying Maxillary Anterior Teeth : A Clinical and Radiographic Prospective Human Study vol.25, pp.4, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1097/id.0000000000000427
  4. Assessment of lower incisor alveolar bone width using cone-beam computed tomography images in skeletal Class III adults of different vertical patterns vol.48, pp.6, 2011, https://doi.org/10.4041/kjod.2018.48.6.349
  5. Relation between the distance from the cementoenamel junction to the bone crest and the thickness of the facial bone in anterior maxillary teeth: A cross-sectional tomographic study vol.24, pp.3, 2011, https://doi.org/10.4317/medoral.22802
  6. Accuracy of periodontal probe visibility in the assessment of gingival thickness vol.50, pp.None, 2011, https://doi.org/10.5051/jpis.2003880194
  7. Three Dimensional mapping of the root apex: distances between apexes and anatomical structures and external cortical plates vol.35, pp.None, 2011, https://doi.org/10.1590/1807-3107bor-2021.vol35.0022
  8. Data on alveolar mandibular bone thickness in Class I skeletal patient with bimaxillary protrusion vol.39, pp.None, 2011, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dib.2021.107423
  9. An in-silico approach to modeling orthodontic tooth movement using stimulus-induced external bone adaptation vol.124, pp.None, 2011, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2021.104827