Restorative Dentistry and Endodontics

  • 제36권2호
  • /
  • Pages.108-113
  • /
  • 2011
  • /
  • 2234-7658(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2234-7666(eISSN)
대한치과보존학회 (The Korean Academy of Conservative Dentistry)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Single-peak LED와 dual-peak LED의 출력 파장 차이가 복합 레진 미세 경도와 색 안정성에 미치는 영향

Effect of the difference in spectral outputs of the single and dual-peak LEDs on the microhardness and the color stability of resin composites

  • 박혜정 (부산대학교 치의학전문대학원 치과보존학교실) ;
  • 손성애 (부산대학교 치의학전문대학원 치과보존학교실) ;
  • 허복 (부산대학교 치의학전문대학원 치과보존학교실) ;
  • 김현철 (부산대학교 치의학전문대학원 치과보존학교실) ;
  • 권용훈 (부산대학교 치의학전문대학원 치과재료학교실) ;
  • 박정길 (부산대학교 치의학전문대학원 치과보존학교실)
  • Park, Hye-Jung (Dept. of Conservative Dentistry, Pusan National University School of Dentistry) ;
  • Son, Sung-Ae (Dept. of Conservative Dentistry, Pusan National University School of Dentistry) ;
  • Hur, Bock (Dept. of Conservative Dentistry, Pusan National University School of Dentistry) ;
  • Kim, Hyeon-Cheol (Dept. of Conservative Dentistry, Pusan National University School of Dentistry) ;
  • Kwon, Yong-Hoon (Dept. of Dental Materials, Pusan National University School of Dentistry and Medical Research Institute) ;
  • Park, Jeong-Kil (Dept. of Conservative Dentistry, Pusan National University School of Dentistry)
  • 투고 : 2010.09.21
  • 심사 : 2010.11.01
  • 발행 : 2011.03.31
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

연구목적: 여러 광개시제 시스템에 의해 활성화되는 복합 레진을 기존의 single-peak LED와 최신의 dual-peak LED로 광중합하였을 때의 누프 미세 경도와 수중 보관 후의 색 안정성 차이를 알아보기 위한 것이다. 연구 재료 및 방법: Camphorquinone이 광개시제로 포함되어 있는 Z100과 다른 광개시제가 포함되어 있는 것으로 알려진 Tetric Ceram과 Aelite LS Posterior를 유리판 위에서 테플론 주형(직경 8 mm, 두께 2 mm) 내로 충전하고, single-peak LED와 dual-peak LED로 광중합하였다. 중합 후 누프 미세 경도를 측정하였고 한 달 후 색 변화를 측정하였다. 광중합기간의 미세 경도와 색 변화 차이를 student t-test로 분석하였다. 결과: 모든 레진에서 dual-peak LED로 광중합하였을 때 미세 경도가 높게 나타났다. 색 안정성 역시 dual-peak LED로 광중합하였을 때 높게 나타났으나 Aelite LS Posterior에서만 통계학적으로 유의한 차이가 있었다. 결론: 다른 광개시제가 포함되어 있는 복합 레진을 dual-peak LED로 광중합한 경우 미세 경도와 색 안정성에 있어서 더 좋은 결과를 얻을 수 있었다.

Objectives: To determine the effect of the spectral output of single and dual-peak light emitting diode (LED) curing lights on the microhardness and color stability of commercial resin composites formulated with camphorquinone and alternative photoinitiators in combination. Materials and Methods: Three light-polymerized resin composites (Z100 (3M ESPE), Tetric Ceram (Ivoclar Vivadent) and Aelite LS Posterior (Bisco)) with different photoinitiator systems were used. The resin composites were packed into a Teflon mold (8 mm diameter and 2 mm thickness) on a cover glass. After packing the composites, they were light cured with single-peak and dual-peak LEDs. The Knoop microhardness (KHN) and color difference (${\Delta}E$) for 30 days were measured. The data was analyzed statistically using a student's t-test (p < 0.05). Results: All resin composites showed improved microhardness when a third-generation dual-peak LED light was used. The color stability was also higher for all resin composites with dual-peak LEDs. However, there was a significant difference only for Aelite LS Posterior. Conclusions: The dual-peak LEDs have a beneficial effect on the microhardness and color stability of resin composites formulated with a combination of camphorquinone and alternative photoinitiators.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Fan PL, Schumacher RM, Azzolin K, Geary R, Eichmiller FC. Curing-light intensity and depth of cure of resin-based composites tested according to international standards. J Am Dent Assoc 2002;133:429-434. https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.2002.0200
  2. Yap AU, Soh MS, Han TT, Siow KS. Influence of curing lights and modes on cross-link density of dental composites. Oper Dent 2004;29:410-415.
  3. Park YJ, Chae KH, Rawls HR. Development of a new photoinitiation system for dental light-cure composite resins. Dent Mater 1999;15:120-127. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0109-5641(99)00021-4
  4. Tak HS, Park SJ. Influences of camphoroquinone on the properties of composites. J Kor Acad Cons Dent 2001;26:41-50.
  5. Neumann MG, Schmitt CC, Ferreira GC, Correa IC. The initiating radical yields and the efficiency of polymerization for various dental photoinitiators excited by different light curing units. Dent Mater 2006;22: 576-584. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2005.06.006
  6. Burtscher P, Rheinberger V. Efficiency of various light initiators after curing with different light-curing units. J Dent Res 2003;Abstract #0042.
  7. Neumann MG, Miranda WG Jr, Schmitt CC, Rueggeberg FA, Correa IC. Molar extinction coefficients and the photon absorption efficiency of dental photoinitiators and light curing units. J Dent 2005;33:525-532. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2004.11.013
  8. de Souza Costa CA, Hebling J, Hanks CT. Effects of light-curing time on the cytotoxicity of a restorative resin composite applied to an immortalized odontoblast-cell line. Oper Dent 2003;28:365-370.
  9. Imazato S, Tarumi H, Kobayashi K, Hiraguri H, Oda K, Tsuchitani Y. Relationship between the degree of conversion and internal discoloration of light-activated composite. Dent Mater 1995;14:23-30. https://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.14.23
  10. Roh BD, Park SH, Lee CS. An experimental study of the degree of conversion and cytotoxicity of dual cure resin cements. J Kor Acad Cons Dent 1995;20:33-53.
  11. Ferracane JL. Correlation between hardness and degree of conversion during the setting reaction of unfilled dental restorative resins. Dent Mater 1985;1:11-14. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0109-5641(85)80058-0
  12. Asmussen E. An accelerated test for color stability of restorative resins. Acta Odontol Scand 1981;39:329-332. https://doi.org/10.3109/00016358109162704
  13. Cho YG, Kim MC. Color changes in composites according to various light curing sources. J Kor Acad Cons Dent 2002;27:87-94. https://doi.org/10.5395/JKACD.2002.27.1.087
  14. Uhl A, Sigusch BW, Jandt KD. Second generation LEDs for the polymerization of oral biomaterials. Dent Mater 2004;20:80-87. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0109-5641(03)00095-2
  15. Price RB, Felix CA, Andreou P. Third-generation vs a second-generation LED curing light: effect on Knoop microhardness. Compend Contin Educ Dent 2006;27:490-496.
  16. Price RB, Felix CA, Andreou P. Evaluation of a dual peak third generation LED curing light. Compend Contin Educ Dent 2005;26:331-332.
  17. Schneider LF, Pfeifer CS, Consani S, Prahl S, Ferracane JL. Influence of photoinitiator type on the rate of polymerization, degree of conversion, hardness and yellowing of dental resin composites. Dent Mater 2008;24:1169-1177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2008.01.007
  18. Nomoto R. Effect of light wavelength on polymerization of light-cured resins. Dent Mater 1997;16: 60-73. https://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.16.60
  19. Arikawa H, Fujii K, Kanie T, Inoue K. Light transmittance characteristics of light-cured composite resins. Dent Mater 1998;14:405-411. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0300-5712(99)00014-7
  20. Oysaed H, Ruyter IE. Water sorption and filler characteristic of composites for use in posterior teeth. J Dent Res 1986;65:1315-1318. https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345860650110601
  21. Inokoshi S, Burrow MF, Kataumi M, Yamada T, Takatsu T. Opacity and color changes of tooth-colored restorative materials. Oper Dent 1996;21:73-80.

피인용 문헌

  1. Optimal combination of 3-component photoinitiation system to increase the degree of conversion of resin monomers vol.36, pp.4, 2011, https://doi.org/10.5395/JKACD.2011.36.4.313
  2. 1,3-Butadiene as an Adhesion Promoter Between Composite Resin and Dental Ceramic in a Dielectric Barrier Discharge Jet vol.33, pp.2, 2013, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11090-013-9437-9