초록
본 연구는 지자체 업무담당자 32명, 산촌생태마을 운영매니저 31명, 전문가 33명, 총 96명을 대상으로 산림청의 산림탄소순환마을 대상지 선정 평가표 개발을 위해 수행하였다. 설문결과분석은 델파이법과 AHP법을 혼합한 DHP분석법을 활용하였다. 산림탄소순환마을 시범사업 선정 평가인자로 1계층 3개 속성, 2계층 10개 속성인자, 3계층 38개 속성세부인자를 선정하였다. 각 속성에 대한 일관성 지수(C.I)를 도출하여 중요도 평가의 기준으로 사용하였다. 1계층의 상대적 중요도가 가장 높은 속성은 인적자원속성(0.454)으로 나타났다. 2계층 속성인자들의 상대적 중요도는 물리적 자원 속성(1계층)에서 산림 Biomass자원 속성인자(0.376), 인적자원속성(1계층)에서 리더역량 속성인자(0.326), 비전속성(1계층)에서 사업계획성 속성인자(0.346)가 상대적으로 높은 중요도를 나타냈다. 3계층 속성세부인자에서는 공동부지의 확보(0.266) 등을 포함한 38개 속성세부인자에 대하여 상대적 중요도를 제시하였다. 상기 도출된 결과를 바탕으로, 산림탄소순환마을 대상지 선정평가 기준표를 작성하였으며, 본 평가표는 2011년부터 산림탄소순환마을 시범 조성마을 선정의 평가기준으로 활용될 예정이다.
The purpose of this study has been carried to develop a criterion for the selection of evaluation factors on Forest Carbon Cycle Community(F.C.C.C) based on the result of survey of 96 participants who were operation managers on mountain eco village(31), relevant experts(33), and officers of local government(32). For analysis of the results of survey, DHP(Delphi Hierarchy Process) method was used which is a combination of Delphi method and AHP(Analytic Hierarchy Process) method. The key factors on selection of a suitable area to launch F.C.C.C. project of Korea Forest Service was selected under three hierarchical classes. Class 1 comprises 3 indices(Physical resource index, Human resource index, Vision index), and Class 2 which contains 10 indices (Existing resource, Surroundings resource, Forest biomass resource, Humanities Social quality, Local resident participation, Leader's ability, External support, Planning of operation, Capability of operation, and Effect of operation). Class 3 is sub-level class of class which possess 38 indices. From the results of analysis, Consistency Index(C.I) of each index in the 3 classes was used as evaluation factor. In Class 1, index 'human resources' showed highest Consistency Index(0.454). In Class 2, index 'forest biomass resources' was the highest Consistency Index(0.376) in 'physical resources' of Class 1, index 'leader's ability' was the highest Consistency Index(0.326) in 'human resources' of Class 1, and index 'planning of operation' was the highest Consistency Index(0.346) in 'vision' of Class 1. In Class 3, relative importance of 38 index including 'Joint ownership land security(C.I.-0.266)' was evaluated. Based on the result of this study, a criterion for the selection of evaluation factors for F.C.C.C was developed and the evaluation criterion is expected to be use to select of a suitable area to launch F.C.C.C. project since 2011.