Journal of Navigation and Port Research (한국항해항만학회지)

Korean Institute of Navigation and Port Research (한국항해항만학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The Influence of Seafarers' Social Identity on Turnover Intention

선원의 사회적 정체성이 이직의사에 미치는 영향

  • Kim, Jung-Man (Division of Transportation Science, National Korea Maritime University) ;
  • Lee, Do-Hwa (Department of Business Administration, Dong-A University)
  • 김정만 (한국해양대학교 해사수송과학부) ;
  • 이도화 (동아대학교 경영학과)
  • Received : 2011.12.08
  • Accepted : 2011.12.20
  • Published : 2011.12.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

This study aims to empirically identify how the antecedents of seafarers' social identity(i.e., socialization, social support, perceived organizational support, status in organization) affect turnover intention via social identity. In order to achieve this objective, this study conducted covariance structure analysis on the questionnaire data collected from 362 seafarers. The main results are as follows: First of all, as social identity of seafarers increases, their turnover intention decreases. Secondly, as socialization, social support, and perceived organizational support increases, seafarers' social identity also increases. Finally, while socialization and social support decrease turnover intention only through social identity, perceived organizational support decreases turnover intention both directly and indirectly via social identity.

이 연구는 선원의 사회적 정체성의 선행요인(사회화, 사회적지지, 조직지원인식, 조직내 지위)이 사회적 정체성을 통해 이직의사에 어떤 영향을 주는지를 실증적으로 검증하는 것을 목적으로 한다. 선원 362명으로부터 회수한 설문자료를 공분산구조분석 방법으로 분석한 결과는 다음과 같다. 첫째, 선원의 사회적 정체성이 높을수록 이직의사가 감소한다. 둘째, 선원의 사회화, 사회적지지, 조직지원인식이 높을수록 선원의 사회적 정체성이 강화된다. 셋째, 사회화와 사회적 지지는 사회적 정체성을 통해서만 이직의사를 감소시키지만, 조직지원인식은 간접적인 효과와 함께 직접적으로도 이직의사를 낮추는 역할을 한다.

Keywords

References

  1. 김도형.서균석.김태형(2011). 학습동기, 경력계획 및 조직지원인식에 따른 경력정체와 이직의도간 관련성. 대한경영학회지, 24(5), 2571-2597.
  2. 박래효.김경수(2006). 노동조합원의 노조특성에 대한 지각이 노동조합참여에 미치는 영향: 상대적 박탈감, 사회정체성, 집단효능감을 중심으로. 인사.조직연구, 14(3),pp. 1-40
  3. 박은철․이도화(2011). 근로자의 가치성향이 노조정체성과 노조참여행동에 미치는 영향. 산업경제연구, 24(1),pp. 371-390.
  4. 오선민(1997). 사회화 관련 학습이 조직몰입, 이직의도에 미치는 영향에 관한 연구. 비서학논총, 6, pp. 137-160.
  5. 장용선.문형구.박준형(2010). 직무배태성, 직무탐색, 이직의도와의 관계에 대한 연구. 한국인사관리학회추계학술대회 발표논문집.
  6. 전기호.이병규.박헌준(2010). 사회적 네트워크, 협조적행동, 그리고 사회적 정체성. 한국인사조직학회 춘계학술연구발표회 발표논문집.
  7. 차종석(2011). 조직사회화의 선행요인과 이직의도의 관계: R&D 인력을 대상으로. 대한경영학회지, 24(5),pp. 2549-2569.
  8. Abrams, D., & Hogg, M. A. (2001). Collective identity: Group membership and self-conception. In M. A. Hogg & R. S. Tindale (eds.), Blackwell handbook of social psychology: Group processes, pp. 425-460). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
  9. Berger, J., & Zelditch, M., Jr. (1998). Status, power, and legitimacy: Strategies and theories. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.
  10. Carsten, J. M., & Spector, P. E.(1987). Unemployment, job satisfaction and employee turnover: A meta-analytic test of Muchinsky model. Journal of Applied Psychology, 72, 374-381. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.72.3.374
  11. Chan, D.(1996). Cognitive misfit of problem-solving style at work: a facet of person-organization fit. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes. 68, pp. 194-207. https://doi.org/10.1006/obhd.1996.0099
  12. Chao, G. T., O'Leary-Kelly, A. M., Wolf, S., Klein, H. J., & Gardner, P. D. (1994). Organizational socialization: Its contents and consequences. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79(5), pp. 730-743. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.79.5.730
  13. Chatman, J. A. (1991). Matching people and organization: Selection and socialization in public accounting firms. Administrative Science Quarterly, 36, pp. 459-484. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393204
  14. Cobb, S. (1976). Social support as a mediator of life stress. Psychosomatic Medicine, 38, pp. 300-314. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006842-197609000-00003
  15. Eisenberger, R., Huntington, R., & Sowa, D. (1986). Perceived organizational support. Journal of Applied Psychology, 71(3), pp. 500-507. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.71.3.500
  16. Fisher, C.(1986). Organizational socialization: An integrative review. In K. Rowland & G. Ferris (eds.), Research in personnel and human resource management, 4, pp. 105-109, Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
  17. Hom, P. W., & Griffeth, R. W. (1991). Structural equations modeling test of a turnover theory: Cross-sectional and longitudinal analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 76(3), 350-366. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.76.3.350
  18. Louis, M. R.(1980). Surprise and sense-making: What newcomers experience in entering unfamiliar organizational setting. Administrative Quarterly, 25(2), pp. 26-51.
  19. March, J. G., & Simon, H. A.(1958). Organizations. New-York: Wiley.
  20. Mitchell, T. R., & Lee, T. W. (2001). The unfolding model of voluntary turnover and job embeddedness: Foundations for a comprehensive theory of attachment," Research in Organizational Behavior, 23, pp. 189-246. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-3085(01)23006-8
  21. Mitchell, T. R., Holtom, B. C., & Lee, T. W., Sablinsky, C. J., & Erez, M. (2001). Why people stay: using job embeddedness to predict voluntary turnover. Academy of Management Journal, 44(6), pp. 1102-1121. https://doi.org/10.2307/3069391
  22. Mobley, W. H. (1977). Intermediate linkages in the relationship between job satisfaction and employee turnover. Journal of Applied Psychology, 62, pp. 237-240. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.62.2.237
  23. O'Reilly, C. W., Chatman, J., & Caldwell, D. F. (1991). People and organizational culture: A profile comparison approach to person-organization fit. Academy of Management Journal, 34, pp. 487-516. https://doi.org/10.2307/256404
  24. Price, J. L., & Muller, C. W.(1981). A causal model of turnover for nurses. Academy of Management Journal, 24, 711-722.
  25. Steers, R. M., & Mowday, R. T.(1981). Employee turnover and postdecision accommodation process. In L. L. Cummings & B. M. Staw (eds.). Research in Organizational behavior, 3, pp. 235-281. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
  26. Vilanova, P., Bernardin, H., Johnson, D., & Dahmus, S. (1994). The validity of a measure of job compatibility in the prediction of job performance and turnover of motion picture theater personnel. Personnel Psychology, 47, pp. 73-90. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.1994.tb02410.x