Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.5394/KINPR.2011.35.10.829

The Influence of Seafarers' Social Identity on Turnover Intention  

Kim, Jung-Man (Division of Transportation Science, National Korea Maritime University)
Lee, Do-Hwa (Department of Business Administration, Dong-A University)
Publication Information
Journal of Navigation and Port Research / v.35, no.10, 2011 , pp. 829-836 More about this Journal
Abstract
This study aims to empirically identify how the antecedents of seafarers' social identity(i.e., socialization, social support, perceived organizational support, status in organization) affect turnover intention via social identity. In order to achieve this objective, this study conducted covariance structure analysis on the questionnaire data collected from 362 seafarers. The main results are as follows: First of all, as social identity of seafarers increases, their turnover intention decreases. Secondly, as socialization, social support, and perceived organizational support increases, seafarers' social identity also increases. Finally, while socialization and social support decrease turnover intention only through social identity, perceived organizational support decreases turnover intention both directly and indirectly via social identity.
Keywords
Turnover Intention; Social Identity; Socialization; Social Support; Perceived Organizational Support; Status in Organization;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Cobb, S. (1976). Social support as a mediator of life stress. Psychosomatic Medicine, 38, pp. 300-314.   DOI
2 Eisenberger, R., Huntington, R., & Sowa, D. (1986). Perceived organizational support. Journal of Applied Psychology, 71(3), pp. 500-507.   DOI
3 Fisher, C.(1986). Organizational socialization: An integrative review. In K. Rowland & G. Ferris (eds.), Research in personnel and human resource management, 4, pp. 105-109, Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
4 Hom, P. W., & Griffeth, R. W. (1991). Structural equations modeling test of a turnover theory: Cross-sectional and longitudinal analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 76(3), 350-366.   DOI
5 Louis, M. R.(1980). Surprise and sense-making: What newcomers experience in entering unfamiliar organizational setting. Administrative Quarterly, 25(2), pp. 26-51.
6 March, J. G., & Simon, H. A.(1958). Organizations. New-York: Wiley.
7 Abrams, D., & Hogg, M. A. (2001). Collective identity: Group membership and self-conception. In M. A. Hogg & R. S. Tindale (eds.), Blackwell handbook of social psychology: Group processes, pp. 425-460). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
8 Berger, J., & Zelditch, M., Jr. (1998). Status, power, and legitimacy: Strategies and theories. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.
9 Carsten, J. M., & Spector, P. E.(1987). Unemployment, job satisfaction and employee turnover: A meta-analytic test of Muchinsky model. Journal of Applied Psychology, 72, 374-381.   DOI
10 Chan, D.(1996). Cognitive misfit of problem-solving style at work: a facet of person-organization fit. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes. 68, pp. 194-207.   DOI   ScienceOn
11 Chao, G. T., O'Leary-Kelly, A. M., Wolf, S., Klein, H. J., & Gardner, P. D. (1994). Organizational socialization: Its contents and consequences. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79(5), pp. 730-743.   DOI   ScienceOn
12 Chatman, J. A. (1991). Matching people and organization: Selection and socialization in public accounting firms. Administrative Science Quarterly, 36, pp. 459-484.   DOI   ScienceOn
13 O'Reilly, C. W., Chatman, J., & Caldwell, D. F. (1991). People and organizational culture: A profile comparison approach to person-organization fit. Academy of Management Journal, 34, pp. 487-516.   DOI   ScienceOn
14 Steers, R. M., & Mowday, R. T.(1981). Employee turnover and postdecision accommodation process. In L. L. Cummings & B. M. Staw (eds.). Research in Organizational behavior, 3, pp. 235-281. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
15 Vilanova, P., Bernardin, H., Johnson, D., & Dahmus, S. (1994). The validity of a measure of job compatibility in the prediction of job performance and turnover of motion picture theater personnel. Personnel Psychology, 47, pp. 73-90.   DOI   ScienceOn
16 Mitchell, T. R., & Lee, T. W. (2001). The unfolding model of voluntary turnover and job embeddedness: Foundations for a comprehensive theory of attachment," Research in Organizational Behavior, 23, pp. 189-246.   DOI   ScienceOn
17 Mitchell, T. R., Holtom, B. C., & Lee, T. W., Sablinsky, C. J., & Erez, M. (2001). Why people stay: using job embeddedness to predict voluntary turnover. Academy of Management Journal, 44(6), pp. 1102-1121.   DOI   ScienceOn
18 Mobley, W. H. (1977). Intermediate linkages in the relationship between job satisfaction and employee turnover. Journal of Applied Psychology, 62, pp. 237-240.   DOI
19 Price, J. L., & Muller, C. W.(1981). A causal model of turnover for nurses. Academy of Management Journal, 24, 711-722.
20 박래효.김경수(2006). 노동조합원의 노조특성에 대한 지각이 노동조합참여에 미치는 영향: 상대적 박탈감, 사회정체성, 집단효능감을 중심으로. 인사.조직연구, 14(3),pp. 1-40
21 박은철․이도화(2011). 근로자의 가치성향이 노조정체성과 노조참여행동에 미치는 영향. 산업경제연구, 24(1),pp. 371-390.
22 오선민(1997). 사회화 관련 학습이 조직몰입, 이직의도에 미치는 영향에 관한 연구. 비서학논총, 6, pp. 137-160.
23 장용선.문형구.박준형(2010). 직무배태성, 직무탐색, 이직의도와의 관계에 대한 연구. 한국인사관리학회추계학술대회 발표논문집.
24 전기호.이병규.박헌준(2010). 사회적 네트워크, 협조적행동, 그리고 사회적 정체성. 한국인사조직학회 춘계학술연구발표회 발표논문집.
25 차종석(2011). 조직사회화의 선행요인과 이직의도의 관계: R&D 인력을 대상으로. 대한경영학회지, 24(5),pp. 2549-2569.
26 김도형.서균석.김태형(2011). 학습동기, 경력계획 및 조직지원인식에 따른 경력정체와 이직의도간 관련성. 대한경영학회지, 24(5), 2571-2597.